Skip to main content

Intel Raptor Lake destroys Alder Lake in an early benchmark

An upcoming Intel Raptor Lake processor has just been spotted in a very early benchmark. It was then compared to its predecessor, Intel Alder Lake, as well as AMD’s current-gen Zen 3 chips.

Although the review can’t be considered fully accurate, the little we do know so far bodes well for Raptor Lake — the CPU was up to 50% faster than Alder Lake in some of the benchmarks.

Intel Raptor Lake early benchmark results.
SiSoftware

Today’s scores come straight from the source — SiSoftware. Using its own Sandra benchmarking tool, the company tested an early engineering sample of the Intel Core i9-13900 and then compared the results to those of the current-gen equivalent CPUs. This resulted in something close to a review of the CPU, although of course, it’s much too early to make any real judgment calls as to its performance.

The engineering sample obtained by SiSoftware was not quite as powerful as the real thing is going to be upon release. It came with the full expected core count of eight performance (P) cores and 16 efficient (E) cores, adding up to a total of 24 cores and 32 threads. However, the clock speeds maxed out at 3.7GHz on the P-cores and just 2.76GHz on the E-cores. The rumored clock speed that should become available upon the release of the chip should hit as high as 5.5GHz for the flagship Core i9-13900, so we’re still a long way from getting anything close to the real numbers.

Intel Raptor Lake features a largely upgraded cache, and this can clearly be seen on the tested chip. The lineup as a whole is said to feature an up to 20% larger L3 cache (up to 36MB unified) and a twice as big L2 cache (up to 32MB). Those are also the numbers provided by the Core i9-13900, so we’re seeing a total of 68MB of cache, marking a huge increase over Intel Alder Lake.

SiSoftware didn’t go into detail as to what kind of a system was used in these tests. We know that Raptor Lake will support up to DDR5-5600 memory, but we don’t know whether that was the kind of RAM used during the benchmarks. Similarly, we don’t know what kind of systems the other CPUs were running. What we do know is that the Intel Core i9-13900 is being compared to the Intel Core i9-12900 with 16 cores and 24 threads, the Core i9-11900K with eight cores and 16 threads, and lastly, the AMD Ryzen 9 5900X with 12 cores and 24 threads.

Intel's Raptor Lake presentation slide.
Intel

As for the benchmark results, it’s hard to deny that they’re pretty juicy. In Whetstone FP32 tests, the Core i9-13900 managed to beat its predecessor by up to 50%. It also proved itself able to deliver a 2x gain in the FP64 test. In the end, it defeated both the Core i9-12900 and the AMD Ryzen 9 5900X. These results take a huge hit in other tests, though, where Raptor Lake wins by 4-6% instead. This is because, just like Intel Alder Lake-S, the new generation of CPUs doesn’t support AVX-512, which is a set of CPU instructions that are not supported by Intel’s E-cores in their current state. AMD’s Zen 4 processors will have AVX-512 capabilities, which could potentially put Team Red in the lead in such tests.

Although the results are a bit all over the board, they should certainly drive the hype for Intel Raptor Lake, set to release in the fall. The CPU outperformed its successor at much lower clock speeds. It does fall short in heavy vectorized/SIMD (single instruction, multiple data) tests, but still wins by around 5-8%. Keep in mind that in terms of benchmarks, this is as early as it gets, so everything might still change by the time the real product makes it to market.

Editors' Recommendations

Monica J. White
Monica is a UK-based freelance writer and self-proclaimed geek. A firm believer in the "PC building is just like expensive…
The only Intel CPU you should buy is over a year old
Intel Core i5-13600K installed in a motherboard.

While it's true that Intel has no shortage of top-notch CPUs, there's only one you should really be buying in 2024 for gaming purposes, and it's well over a year old. It's not that the other CPUs are bad -- it's that this processor is quite unmatched in terms of performance per dollar, and it's more than good enough for most uses.

The CPU in question is the Intel Core i5-13600K. You might be tempted to buy something pricier, perhaps even something as over the top as the Core i9-14900KS. But I'm here to tell you that you really don't need to. And if you'd rather spend even less, I'll show you my favorite alternatives.
A value pick
Intel's Core i5 series is typically the one to target in terms of value, but there's usually a gap between the midrange i5 and the enthusiast i7. While that gap is still present in this generation, it's nowhere near big enough for you to have to worry about it if all you're looking for is gaming.

Read more
Nice try, Intel, but AMD 3D V-Cache chips still win
A hand holding AMD's Ryzen 9 7950X3D processor.

Intel's freshly released Core i9-14900KS processor is advertised as the fastest CPU in the world, but does that mean AMD can never hope to compete, even with its flagship Ryzen 9 7950X3D? Not at all. Each CPU has its merits, and both are insanely powerful in their own right. At this price point and at this performance level, making the right choice is tricky.

Let's zoom in and find out how the Core i9-14900KS and the Ryzen 9 7950X3D stack up against each other, what they excel at, and which one is the better option to buy.
Pricing and availability

Read more
Reviewers agree: Intel’s latest chip is truly ridiculous
Intel's 14900K CPU socketed in a motherboard.

Intel's "Special Edition" KS chips are meant to be over the top. But the latest Core i9-14900KS has just dropped, and it takes things to new heights of insanity.

It's a super-clocked version of the already ludicrous 14900K that sports the same great quantity of cores, but a boost clock that moves even beyond the extremes of the standard 14900K. It can hit an unprecedented 6.2GHz on a couple of cores right out of the box, making it the fastest CPU by clock speed ever unleashed upon the public.

Read more