DOJ: The Web is One Percent Pornography

By Geoff Duncan November 15, 2006

As part of its effort to defend the Child Online Protection Act of 1998, the U.S. Justice Department introduced the findings of a government-commissioned study, conducted by Berkeley statistician Philip Stark, which found that about one percent of the Web sites indexed by Google, Yahoo, and Microsoft’s Internet search engines are sexually explicit.

The Child Online Protection Act has yet to be enforced, and was blocked by the U.S. Supreme Court in 2004, which found that unduly inhibited free speech rights of adults on the Internet. In its ruling, the court said filtering technology may be a more practical solution to protecting children from obscene and sexually explicit material on the Internet than any legislative solution. COPA was challenged by the ACLU on behalf of a wide range of online publishers.

As part of its case to re-instate COPA, the Justice Department issued subpoenas for search engine queries and indexing data from Yahoo, Microsoft, and Google, ostensibly to determine what volume of material indexed by major search engines was sexually explicit, and how often those search facilities were used to locate sexually explicit material. (Only Google fought the subpoenas, significantly reducing the amount of information it turned over to the DOJ.)

The government study found that under the strictest filter tested, AOL’s “Mature Teen” filter, some 91 percent of the sexually explicit Web sites in indexes obtained from Google and MSN were blocked. Less restrictive filters blocked at least 40 percent of the sexually explicit sites.

Stark also found that while many of the most popular sexually-explicit sites in the Google and MSN indexes are in the U.S., about half the sexually explicit sites are hosted outside the U.S., which in many cases could put them beyond the reach of U.S. legislation.

Closing arguments in the trial are expected to begin next week.

Editors' Recommendations

Former Digital Trends Contributor

Geoff Duncan writes, programs, edits, plays music, and delights in making software misbehave. He's probably the only member…

Computing

Blue Screen of Death: What it means and what to do if you get one

The Blue Screen of Death seen on a laptop.

The BSOD, or Blue Screen of Death, is an iconic error screen that anyone who's ever used a Windows PC has liekly come across at one time or another. It's no fun, and it can mean there's a problem with your PC that needs fixing. But in most cases, it's just one of those things that crops up, and simply keeping your PC updated will be enough to prevent it from coming up again.

Here's everything you need to know about BSODs and what to do if youget one.
What is a BSOD?
The stop error screen, or as it's colloquially known for its blue coloring, the BSOD, is an error screen that appears when something has gone critically wrong with your PC. It doesn't mean it's fundamentally broken, but it means something has gone so wrong with it that it can no longer function and needs to reboot to get working again.

Computing

Razer’s most boring product is also one of its best

The Razer Iskur V2 gaming chair in an office.

Razer isn't exactly known for subtlety. This is the company that released a Bane-like RGB face mask, a headset with haptic feedback, and most recently, a mouse pad that has RGB lighting from corner to corner. The Iskur V2 chair is an exercise in subtlety, however, and a change of pace that pays off for Razer in a big way.

There's nothing special about the Iskur V2 at first glance. It's a gaming chair fit with the usual racer-style back and some green trim to let you know it's a Razer product. But there are no motors promising immersive haptic feedback, and no RGB leaving you tethered to a wall outlet (yes, Razer has done both in a chair before). The Iskur V2 is just a well-designed, comfortable chair, and that's exactly why it's so impressive.
Out of the box

Computing

We’re one step closer to replicating the human brain

A digital brain on a computer interface.

Scientists from the Netherlands and South Korea have just built a device dubbed "iontronic memristor (memory resistor)," or in other words, an artificial synapse. This device, just a little bit wider than a human hair, mimics the part of the brain that helps us think and learn. This isn't the first time scientists have tried to tackle creating a device that can resemble the thinking of the human brain, but this one's special, because it's not built like the others -- it's built like our brains.

So, what is this brain-like device, and why is it so special? Get ready for some science talk. The iontronic memristor has a tapered microfluidic channel, shaped like a cone, inside which sits a solution of salt (potassium chloride) dissolved in water. Yes, it's literally just salt and water.