Skip to main content

Pricing error at checkout 6! There’s no way the Fire Phone should cost this much

pricing error checkout 6 theres way fire phone cost much amazon 3d
Image used with permission by copyright holder

If Amazon had a brick and mortar store, I’d assume there had been a pricing error when I reached the checkout with a Fire Phone in my hand. What’s that? $200 with a two-year contract? No, there has to be a mistake. It says Amazon on the box, not Apple, and it’s prime reason for being is to make me spend money in the store. What happened to drawing me in with cheap hardware?

The Fire Phone’s price is so unexpected, you have to assume Amazon has been perusing the self-help books on optimism found on its virtual shelves. It simply isn’t a high-end brand. It’s not Apple, Samsung, or Sony, and it’s doubtful many image-conscious smartphone buyers picture themselves pulling the device from the pocket of their G-Stars. Nondescript devices are fine when they’re cheap, but the Fire Phone is aimed at the big-leagues.

What’s with the delusions of grandeur? It’s possible Amazon has been listening to the marketers. For several years, Amazon has topped global brand perception charts, beating names including Coca-Cola, McDonald’s, Nokia, and Microsoft. “What the hell,” an Amazon marketer may have said, “People love us, so let’s put out a premium smartphone to make some more cash.”

Don’t listen to the marketing department, Amazon

It’s a solid idea, except what the man in the turtleneck shirt and oversized spectacles didn’t remember, is that Amazon’s excellent brand perception is based on perceived value over price paid. In other words, we think Amazon sells us quality goods at a very competitive price. The Kindle Fire tablet is proof of this. It’s cheap, and it works well. The Fire Phone isn’t cheap at all, and doesn’t even have the good grace to come with top-end specs to justify the high price.

The 3D nonsense is a feature nobody asked for, and the rest of the specs don’t stand up to the Galaxy S5,

People whinge all the time about the iPhone 5S costing too much, not having a large, high enough resolution screen, and about Apple supposedly fleecing its customers. If that’s you, then you need to direct the same degree of outrage at Amazon’s effort. Apple gets away with it because nobody expects it to be cheap, or offer the very best specs, but in the desirability stakes, it’s up there with Emma Watson in a backless evening gown, hence many of us are willing to pay up. Amazon’s dreaming if it thinks it has the same pull.

A 2011 article in Ad Age quoted the director of brand specialists Millward Brown, who said many of the companies featured in the top ten could “afford to raise their prices,” because the gap between value and price was so huge. There’s evidence Amazon has been listening too, having already slapped an extra $20 on Amazon Prime. Amazon sees it as confidence, but history may show it to be arrogance.

Where’s the value?

Despite the increase, Amazon Prime is still good value. The Fire Phone, on paper, isn’t. The 3D nonsense is a feature nobody asked for, and the rest of the specs don’t stand up to the Galaxy S5, or any other true high-end Android phone. The screen rivals the cheaper Moto X, which benefits from less gimmicky and more useful voice control features. Those invested in the smartphone spec war will almost certainly pass, then, as will anyone wanting the sexiness of an Apple product.

Android fans won’t want the Fire Phone either, because it can’t run the Google Play Store, and doesn’t come with Google’s own apps installed. So who will buy it? Amazon fanboys, who will use it when wearing their homemade Amazon polo shirt, while they stack cardboard boxes in a mock-up of an Amazon warehouse.

You’re just not cool enough to pull this off, Amazon

High-end smartphones are supposed to be really cool. The One M8, the Xperia Z2, and the iPhone 5S are all properly desirable, and come with a recognized brand name attached. After spending that amount of money, most people want their friends to know and be slightly envious. The Fire Phone is a bit dreary to look at, has a gimmicky headline feature, and is ultimately a cynical new way to spend more money with Amazon. It’s a compromise, and owners must put up with it while suffering the ignominy of advertising how much they love an essentially faceless retailer.

Amazon’s basic Fire Phone will cost you $1,640 over two years, provided you take AT&T’s cheapest option, or $1,540 if you take into account the year of free Prime membership. A Moto X or a Nexus 5 costs nothing on a contract, or around $350 without one. The Amazon website is free to use, and there’s an app for your phone too. If that’s not enough, a Kindle Fire HDX is $230. There’s simply no good reason to buy the Fire Phone. Amazon’s obviously confident its brand is strong enough to catch roving eyes, but will yours, or anyone else’s, really ever wander in the Fire’s direction?

Editors' Recommendations

Topics
Andy Boxall
Senior Mobile Writer
Andy is a Senior Writer at Digital Trends, where he concentrates on mobile technology, a subject he has written about for…
The Galaxy S24 could crush the iPhone 15 in a really big way
The back of the Galaxy S23 Ultra and iPhone 14 Pro.

You may think it's a bit early to start dreaming of the Galaxy S24, but the rumor mill would happily disagree with you. New details about the S24 recently surfaced online, and if they're true, the phone could have a surprisingly big advantage over the iPhone 15.

Per a report from the Chinese social network Weibo, the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset is expected to have a 50% faster GPU compared to the one on the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 — the chip inside the Galaxy S23, Galaxy S23 Plus, and Galaxy S23 Ultra.
Why this is big news for the Galaxy S24

Read more
How much is the iPhone 14? Here’s exactly what it costs
The iPhone 14 Pro and iPhone 14.

Apple's newest iteration of the iPhone has been available for purchase for a while, but some people are just now looking into picking it up. The iPhone 14 is the most advanced smartphone Apple has ever made and, thanks to the Dynamic Island of the iPhone 14 Pro and Pro Max, it stands out as unique when compared to the rest of Apple's smartphone lineup.

Because there are four discrete devices in the iPhone 14 line, and within each phone there are multiple hardware options, understanding how much each iPhone costs can be a little bit of a challenge. It's a good thing that Apple is offering so many different options for people to purchase the phone that best suits their needs, but as a result, there's a little bit of confusion about the different versions.

Read more
The iPhone 14 Pro’s A16 chip comes with a huge hidden cost
An iPhone 14 pulled apart, revealing all of the components inside.

When Apple launched the iPhone 14 and iPhone 14 Pro lineups this year, one of the biggest differentiating factors between the two models was the silicon inside. Apple’s new A16 Bionic is exclusive to the iPhone 14 Pro and iPhone 14 Pro Max, while the iPhone 14 and iPhone 14 Plus still use the last-gen A15 that debuted with the iPhone 13 series. The reasoning behind this decision comes down to the manufacturing price of the A16, which turns out to be more than twice the cost of the A15.

A teardown of the iPhone 14 devices was done by Nikkei Asia, which allowed the site to take a closer look at the various components of each part, such as the cameras and processors. According to Nikkei Asia’s findings, the production costs for the iPhone 14 Pro’s A16 chip are about 20% more expensive to make than the previous iteration, coming in at a total of $110. This is about 2.4 times more expensive than the A15 that debuted in the iPhone 13 series and is recycled in the standard iPhone 14 and iPhone 14 Plus models.

Read more