Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. Legacy Archives

Ask.com For Sale? Jeeves’s Services May No Longer Be Required

Add as a preferred source on Google
ASk Jeeves (UK, thumb)
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Internet search engine Ask.com has a storied history, launching back in the mid-1990s as Ask Jeeves, competing alongside Yahoo, Google, and AltaVista for mindshare in the nascent Internet search business—and sporting s distinctive character with Jeeves, P.D. Wodehouse’s fictional valet. Back in 2005, AskJeeves was bought by Barry Diller’s IAC/InterActiveCorp for a cool $1.85 billion—and although IAC has pumped resources into the the renamed Ask.com (Jeeves still appears on UK versions of the site), the search engine has never managed to gain significant marketshare, despite offering innovations like site previews and in-results media, and being the first search engine to offer users a way to opt out of behavior tracking based on their search queries, Internet addresses, and other information.

Now, in a conference call to investor covering the company’s third quarter financial results, IAC CEO Barry Diller has indicated he’d be willing to sell Ask.com. “We’ve been asked a lot whether we’re open to consolidating transactions in the area of search,” Diller said in the call. “The answer is yes. And it is unlikely that we would be the consolidator.”

Recommended Videos

Currently the top three players in the Internet search arena are Google, Yahoo, and Microsoft, with Microsoft heavily promoting its new Bing search engine…and inking a ten-year deal with Yahoo to have Bing power Yahoo searches. According to media metrics firm comScore, Ask.com is hovering right around a 4 percent market share: while Bing is gaining, most of its usership seems to be coming at the expense of Yahoo: Ask.com and fifth-place AOL Search haven’t suffered greatly, but they have also failed to gain any additional traction in Internet search for some time.

The big question, of course, is who would be interested in buying Ask.com? The answer is probably Microsoft, which is struggling to expand its search and online advertising business as it tries to compete with Google. A 4 percent bump in usership might not seem like much, but it’s a bump Microsoft could get just by spending money…and Redmond has plenty of that.

Geoff Duncan
Former Contributor
Geoff Duncan writes, programs, edits, plays music, and delights in making software misbehave. He's probably the only member…
OpenAI is investigating more incidents of AI agents going rogue days after hack
OpenAI logo on Microsoft surface

It appears that the "AI agents going rogue" tale has more to it than what AI giants have revealed publicly so far. Merely days after OpenAI announced that its AI agents went rogue and hacked Hugging Face, Anthropic dropped a similar bombshell. Soon, it was discovered that not just one, but multiple services were compromised. Well, it seems there are even more layers to it.

Reuters reports that OpenAI has found more incidents of AI agents escaping their software containment environment during research. Citing sources with knowledge of the incident, the outlet notes that the AI agents didn't go beyond OpenAI's software environment and affect any external service.

Read more
AI is finding Apple security flaws faster than Apple can sort through them
Apple has limited how many bug reports researchers can keep open as AI tools produce both genuine Mac vulnerabilities and a flood of questionable submissions
Lighting, Architecture, Building

Apple has capped the number of security reports researchers can keep open at once after AI bug hunting put its review process under pressure, according to the Financial Times.

Some submissions describe hallucinated or purely theoretical risks. Others uncover vulnerabilities serious enough to require patches. Bynario told the FT that it found more than 50 possible macOS flaws in three weeks, including a privilege-escalation chain that could give an attacker full control of a Mac.

Read more
Anthropic is paying $1.5 billion over pirated books, but it can still legally cut up purchased ones
The settlement addressed unauthorized ebook downloads, not the destructive scanning of lawfully bought physical copies, a distinction now alarming booksellers
Book, Publication, Indoors

A federal judge has approved Anthropic’s $1.5 billion settlement over nearly half a million pirated books. The same litigation also protected a more physical method of feeding its AI systems. Anthropic bought print books, removed their bindings, scanned every page and destroyed the originals.

The legal divide came down to acquisition. The settlement covers books downloaded from LibGen and PiLiMi, while the court treated Anthropic’s one-for-one conversion of purchased books into private digital files as fair use. Training AI models on lawfully acquired material was also considered transformative.

Read more