Skip to main content

Dynamic Skip Fire: GM hopes to use cylinder management tech to increase efficiency by 15%

Cylinder deactivation, the act of shutting off predetermined arrangements of pistons to save fuel, is nothing new.

Also called variable displacement, the engine management system has existed in concept form for decades, and today, you’ll find variants of it in newer cars from Honda, Mercedes-Benz, Audi, and General Motors.

With the help of Silicon Valley startup Tula Technology, GM is looking to take the fuel savings one step further by employing something called Dynamic Skip Fire (DSF).

Instead of shutting off entire cylinder banks, DSF analyzes each piston individually, determining whether to ignite or bypass it based on the driver’s throttle input and torque demands. According to the automaker, the system has shown fuel savings of up to 15 percent when compared to an engine without cylinder deactivation.

“This technology holds the potential to improve fuel economy on select GM vehicles without degrading power capability when it’s required,” said GM Chief Technical Officer Jon Lauckner. “This joint effort combines software expertise from Silicon Valley with powertrain expertise from General Motors.”

DSF is primarily a software-based approach. However, in order for it to work, the engine must already have cylinder deactivation hardware installed. There are always concerns about vibration when altering the firing order, but GM claims the technology avoids excessive reverberation while providing the required engine torque.

The program is still in the testing stages, but with fuel efficiency standards rising, Tula Technology and GM seem committed to making DSF production-ready.

“We’ve worked closely with GM during this exciting stage of DSF development, and they’ve provided essential financial support while allowing us to run our business with full autonomy,” said R. Scott Bailey, CEO of Tula Technology. “Our goal is the same as GM; we both innovate to make the lives of people better.”

Andrew Hard
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Andrew first started writing in middle school and hasn't put the pen down since. Whether it's technology, music, sports, or…
Rivian R2 vs R1S: How will Rivian’s cheaper SUV compare?
The front three-quarter view of a 2022 Rivian against a rocky backdrop.

Rivian has finally unveiled the R2, its long-awaited attempt at a more affordable electric SUV. The new vehicle may not be available just yet, but fans of Rivian's design aesthetics and feature set are already looking forward to being able to order the new car. The R2 is targeted at being a more affordable take on the electric SUV and will sit alongside the flagship-tier R1S.

Let's get this out of the way right now: The R1S is most likely going to be a better vehicle than the R2. Rivian isn't replacing the R1S with the R2 — it's releasing the R2 as a more affordable alternative, and there will be some compromises when buying the R2 over the R1S.

Read more
Cybertruck production reportedly halted over pedal issue
Tesla CEO Elon Musk behind the wheel of a Cybertruck.

Tesla CEO Elon Musk behind the wheel of a Cybertruck. Tesla

Tesla’s Cybertruck has been hit by a production delay caused by an issue with a part of the vehicle, a number of media reports have claimed.

Read more
Don’t let the gimmicks fool you. The Ioniq 5 N is a serious track car
2025 Hyundai Ioniq 5 N drifting.

We’re finally getting to the fun part of automakers’ methodical quest to replicate their lineups with electric cars.

Performance versions of ordinary cars have been a staple of the auto industry for decades. But while we’ve already seen some variants of EVs boasting more power and more impressive stats — think Tesla Model S Plaid or Lucid Air Sapphire — the 2025 Hyundai Ioniq 5 N is the first to truly apply that format to an EV.

Read more