Intel supports AMD in surprise adaptive-sync endorsement

By Jon Martindale August 20, 2015

Screen tearing in Batman game. — Image used with permission by copyright holder

Synchronising a display’s refresh rate with the FPS being output by the graphics card is important for gaming. Without it, we end up with screen tearing which can ruin immersion. With traditional technologies though, performance was limited.

Both AMD and Nvidia have released their own synchronizing technologies in recent years, but Intel looks to be siding with the VESA DisplayPort 1.2a standard that underlies AMD’s tech, as one of its key personnel has stated in an interview that it plans to support adaptive sync technology.

While he didn’t explicitly name AMD or Nvidia in his chat with TechReport, chief graphics software architect at Intel, David Blythe did say that Intel was inclined to support the optional extension of the DisplayPort 1.2a specification. However, Blythe wouldn’t be drawn out on when that support would be implemented or with which products.

Get your weekly teardown of the tech behind PC gaming

Related: Nvidia G-Sync or AMD FreeSync? Pick a side and stick with it

According to other unnamed sources, there are no immediate developments of Intel’s HD Graphics hardware to make it compatible with Adaptive Sync. This means that we will likely need to wait beyond Skylake to find any form of frame synching on variable refresh displays using Intel hardware only. However, perhaps in the future syncing frame rates will no longer require a dedicated GPU.

What will be worth watching is how the eventual support of an industry giant like Intel affects the landscape. As it stands, Nvidia’s GSync, while arguably the better of the technologies, is more expensive. AMD’s FreeSync doesn’t cost any extra to implement and has much less of an impact on frame rates.

Therefore, if Intel pushes for the unbranded solution, it will be interesting to see how well maintained and supported AMD and Nvidia’s alternative technology remains in the coming years.

Do any of you have FreeSync or GSync displays? Do you like the way the technology is implemented?

Editors' Recommendations

Topics

Computing Coordinator

Jon Martindale is the Evergreen Coordinator for Computing, overseeing a team of writers addressing all the latest how to…

Computing

Here’s a shocking reminder of just how far ahead Intel is in race with AMD

Intel Core i5-14600K processor inside its socket.

It's no secret that between Intel and AMD, it's Intel that holds the majority of the market -- but a recent market analysis report really highlights just how much Intel beats both AMD and Apple. While both Intel and AMD make some of the best CPUs, and Apple has its own excellent proprietary silicon, Intel's CPU shipments trump them both. The report tells us that Intel controls a whopping 78% of the PC processor market.

The information comes from Canalys, a PC industry research firm. It's worth noting that it excludes tablets, which would have bumped up Apple's numbers a bit, as well as Qualcomm's. But zooming in on the PC CPU market alone, including desktops and laptops, tells a different story. The research shows a 78% market share for Intel and 13% for AMD, while Apple accounts for about 8% or slightly more. The rest belongs to MediaTek, Qualcomm, and ARM.

Computing

AMD vs. Intel: the rivalry has never been more fierce

An AMD Ryzen 7000 processor slotted into a motherboard.

If you’re building your own PC, there’s plenty of criteria to consider when molding your machine. What operating system do you plan on using? What graphics card will be best for gaming? And where exactly can one buy all these components? There’s a lot to think about, but one important decision you can’t forget is whether you’ll be using an AMD or Intel processor for your new machine.

A war of chips and cores that shows no sign of stopping, the age-old battle of AMD vs Intel is a classic competition, but is one processor brand better than the other? That’s where we come in.

Computing

AMD is finally taking FreeSync to the next level

Two monitors with AMD FreeSync over a dark background.

It took a long time, but AMD has just updated its FreeSync adaptive sync technology requirements, and it was a much-needed change. Previously, the base tier of FreeSync didn't have any refresh rate requirements that monitors had to meet. Now, AMD didn't just add a requirement, but it's pretty massive -- and that's great news for the future of gaming monitors.

When AMD first introduced FreeSync in 2015, the vast majority of gamers and casual users alike were using a 60Hz monitor. While screens with higher refresh rates existed, they were a rarity. That's no longer the case today, and almost all of the top monitors, regardless of their price, offer refresh rates of over 120Hz.