Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Phones
  3. Business
  4. Mobile
  5. News

Uber’s inadequate background checks for drivers has cost it $10M

Add as a preferred source on Google

Uber has agreed to pay out millions of dollars to settle a lawsuit claiming it misled customers about the service’s safety.

Thursday’s settlement concerns the ride-hailing company’s operation in San Francisco and Los Angeles and was the result of a consumer protection lawsuit filed in 2014.

Recommended Videos

Uber has to pay $10 million within 60 days, with the payment likely to be split equally between the two cities. Should it fail to comply, the amount will automatically increase to $25 million, the LA Times reported.

George Gascón, one of two district attorneys that filed the lawsuit, said Uber had been making unreasonable claims about the robustness of its background checks on new drivers, checks the company had trumpeted as “industry leading” and “the gold standard.”

The attorney claimed the checks were “completely worthless” as they didn’t even involve fingerprinting new recruits when checking for past convictions, something most taxi companies have long done, adding that by repeating the “misleading” statements, Uber was “giving consumers a false sense of security when deciding whether to get into a stranger’s car.”

During the case proceedings last year, Gascón and district attorney Jackie Lacey claimed Uber’s procedures, which include the examination of county, federal, and multi-state criminal background records, resulted in the company missing criminal records for 25 Uber applicants in San Francisco and Los Angeles. They said this was partly down to Uber ignoring a database of around 30,000 registered sex offenders, and also because the checks only cover the preceding seven years.

Uber said it’s already stopped claiming that its background checks are the best in the industry following the settlement of another case in February, and says it also made improvements to its vetting procedures.

The LA Times described Thursday’s settlement as “relatively small” and “something of a coup” for the company, which today is valued at $62.5 billion.

Commenting on the court’s decision, an Uber spokesperson said, “We’re glad to put this case behind us and excited to redouble our efforts serving riders and drivers across the state of California.”

Responding, Gascón said Thursday’s outcome goes “well beyond its impact on Uber,” adding that “it sends a clear message to all businesses, and to startups in particular, that in the quest to quickly obtain market share, laws designed to protect consumers cannot be ignored. If a business acts like it is above the law, it will pay a heavy price.”

Trevor Mogg
Contributing Editor
Not so many moons ago, Trevor moved from one tea-loving island nation that drives on the left (Britain) to another (Japan)…
Viaim RecDot Review: These AI earbuds sounds great and also take notes for you
These earbuds do the one thing they set out to do, and they do it extremely well.
Viaiam RecDot in-ear

Button Text

Quick Take

Read more
Apple’s new Upgrade plan looks cheap until you remember who owns the device
Apple Upgrade could be perfect for serial upgraders. But most people aren't one
Computer, Electronics, Laptop

Apple has found a great way to make an expensive iPhone more approachable. Apple Upgrade lets customers lease eligible devices through Klarna, with iPhone terms lasting 12 or 24 months. At the end, you can return the device, begin another lease, or pay the remaining amount to own it.

My initial reaction focused heavily on the value customers lose by returning an iPhone they could have sold or traded. While that concern is still valid, the program makes considerably more sense for a select group of people who already replace their iPhones every year. But the question is... how many people actually do that?

Read more
Pixel 11 Pro Fold appears in official-looking images, and its design leaves me underwhelmed
Google’s next foldable looks too similar to the Pixel 10 Pro Fold
Electronics, Mobile Phone, Phone

Previous CAD renders had already lowered my expectations for the Pixel 11 Pro Fold. The latest promotional material shared by Evan Blass through the Leakmail newsletter leaves little hope of anything beyond a new paint job and design tweaks so minor that most people would struggle to notice them without looking closely.

The phone looks disappointingly similar to the Pixel 10 Pro Fold, retaining the same proportions, rounded corners, and unusual camera island. I have never liked the way Google stacks what look like two smaller Pixel camera visors on top of each other. It feels awkward rather than cohesive.

Read more