Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Business
  3. News

Google’s Waze accused of stealing data from rival traffic app

Trevor Mogg
By

googles waze accused of stealing data from rival traffic app police map
There’s possible trouble in the road ahead for Google and Waze, the traffic and navigation startup it acquired in 2013.

Competing service PhantomAlert this week filed a lawsuit in a San Francisco federal court claiming Waze stole some of its data to help improve its product prior to Google’s acquisition of the company.

Related Videos

PhantomAlert, which, like Waze, also offers drivers real-time data on things like traffic congestion and road construction as well as information on stoplights and red-light cameras, alleges in the suit that “Waze copied PhantomAlert’s proprietary database without permission and incorporated that misappropriated data into Waze’s popular iPhone and Android navigation apps.”

Related

So with most road maps understandably looking pretty much the same, how did PhantomAlert arrive at the idea that Waze might be taking some of its data for its own iOS and Android apps?

Well, an old trick employed over the years by map makers keen to protect their work has been to drop in a few “trap streets” or “copyright traps,” fictitious roads or other fake data that would be hard for a rival to explain away should they get caught including it in their own map. In PhantomAlert’s case, the fake data comprised a small portion of content from its own “points of interest” database.

PhantomAlert boss Joseph Seyoum told Cnet he decided to take a closer look at Waze’s data after the $1-billion deal with Google went through. It was then that he claims to have spotted some of PhantomAlert’s fake points-of-interest data on Waze’s maps.

But here the story takes another turn. Some time after Google acquired the Israel-based company in 2013, some of those trap streets, as well as other data points from PhantomAlert’s own content, started turning up in some of Google’s own apps.

Washington, DC-based PhantomAlert has had dealings with Waze in the past. In 2010 the pair entered into discussions over a possible data-sharing deal, but talks ultimately collapsed because, according to PhantomAlert attorney Karl Kronenberger, “Waze did not have a substantial database to share at that time.”

Kronenberger said in a statement this week, “Waze needed to grow its database to increase its value and become more attractive to potential acquirers,” adding, “Our complaint alleges that Waze stole PhantomAlert’s database when Waze could not get it legally, and then sold itself to Google for over $1 billion.”

In the same statement, Seyoum makes his feelings clear: “I started PhantomAlert seven years ago as an entrepreneur with a dream, and now that dream has been crushed by companies that are profiting from the years of blood, sweat and tears our team put into our product.”

The startup is seeking monetary damages (amount unspecified) as well as an injunction to stop Waze and Google using the allegedly stolen data in their various apps.

Digital Trends has contacted Waze for comment and will update if we hear back.

Editors' Recommendations

Topics
What is 5G? Speeds, coverage, comparisons, and more
The 5G UW icon on the Samsung Galaxy S23.

It's been years in the making, but 5G — the next big chapter in wireless technology — is finally approaching the mainstream. While we haven't yet reached the point where it's available everywhere, nearly all of the best smartphones are 5G-capable these days, and you're far more likely to see a 5G icon lit up on your phone than not.

There's more to 5G than just a fancy new number, though. The technology has been considerably more complicated for carriers to roll out since it covers a much wider range of frequencies than older 4G/LTE technology, with different trade-offs for each. It's also a much farther-reaching wireless technology, promising the kind of global connectivity that was once merely a dream found in futuristic sci-fi novels.

Read more
You may want to think twice about buying a Samsung or Pixel phone
The Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra next to the Google Pixel 7 Pro.

A new report from Project Zero, Google's internal security research team, says that a laundry list of devices using Exynos modems are at a high risk of major security breaches that would give remote users the ability to very easily "compromise a phone at the baseband level." Notably, the recently released Pixel 7 is among those that are open to attack, alongside the Pixel 6 and Samsung Galaxy S22, to name just a few.

Obviously, this is a major issue, but not all hope is lost, as the problem is certainly fixable. The big question is when a fix for all affected devices is coming. Here's everything you need to know about the vulnerability and what you can do to keep your smartphone safe.
Why Samsung and Pixel phones are in danger

Read more
The Google Pixel Fold may not be as expensive as you thought
Alleged renders of the Google Pixel Fold in black.

Google’s long-in-development foldable phone — the Pixel Fold — is reportedly eyeing a late June launch. A recent leak predicted that the Pixel Fold will hit the European shelves priced at 1,700 Euros, which equates to roughly $1,800 based on current conversion rates. That’s not easy to digest, especially for a first-gen foldable phone and considering Google’s own shaky history with its Pixel hardware and software.
But it appears that the Pixel Fold’s price won’t be inexplicably exorbitant at all. Leaker Yogesh Bear shared on Twitter that the foldable phone could actually cost anywhere between $1,300 and $1,500. Assuming that turns out to be true, the Pixel Fold could undercut the Samsung Galaxy Fold 4 and its successor by a healthy $500.

In fact, such an asking price would put the Pixel Fold in roughly the same ballpark as the higher storage configurations of phones like the Galaxy S23 Ultra and Apple’s iPhone 14 Pro Max. Of course, Google won’t be able to match the asking price of foldables from Chinese brands, but it would at least look competitive in the Western markets.
Now, a price of around $1,300-1,500 makes a lot of sense. First, the biggest deterrent for foldable phones is their high asking price. There’s a reason Samsung managed to sell bucketloads of its flip-style foldable phones because they cost nearly half vis-a-vis the phone-tablet hybrids in the Galaxy Z Fold series.

Read more