Skip to main content

2011 Chevrolet Corvette Grand Sport Convertible review

2011-Corvette-front-grille
Image used with permission by copyright holder

In an explosive scene in the movie Fast Five, Vin Diesel drives a 1963 Corvette Stingray out of a moving train. For anyone familiar with the car, you know the scene is not only impossible (the car is at the wrong angle) but you probably winced about the landing that breaks the front grille.

Recommended Videos

Driving the 2011 Chevy Grand Sport Convertible 4LT is a bit like that. The car is just a beauty to behold, a testament to smart American engineering, and an acceleration champ. It also makes you think about how you’re driving, because the front grille is so extremely low that it gives you a serious aversion to speed bumps, ruts in the road, and even random tree branches. That said, on the open road there are no worries about minor road annoyances — the Grand Sport drives with feather-touch accuracy.

Power and precision

It’s interesting to compare the Corvette GS to the Camaro SS, which we just drove a few weeks ago. Both emit a wonderful growl, although the Camaro SS gets the nod for the “scare small children” effect. Well, and that depends on how you drive. Cruising around town with the Corvette GS, the engine makes a low hum but it’s not something people notice right away. (With the Camaro, people saw us from a block away and gave the thumbs-up sign long before we even passed them by.)

Yet, any time you wind up the engine, the GS goes into a unique gear-tuning mode that pumps out a bit more power for fast acceleration – your head snaps back to the seat cushion, and the exhaust sounds like an artillery salute. In fact, every model in the Corvette line, including the Z06 we drove about a year ago in Detroit, makes this blistering sound and the occasional gun-shot backfire.

2011-Corvette-rear
Image used with permission by copyright holder

The Camaro SS and Corvette GS could not be more different, however. While they share a similar engine – the GS has a 430-horsepower V8 engine and goes 0 to 60mph in just 3.95 seconds – the Camaro is really a muscle car with a chunky exterior meant for pounding the pavement, not smoothing it over. The GS is all about sleek styling. The angular lines make more than a passing hint at a Porsche 911. From the starting block, you feel a tremendous punch in first gear and can usually stay in that gear much longer. The aerodynamics make cornering smooth and push fuel economy up to about 26mpg highway.

Interestingly, there is one primary difference between the GS model and the Z06, other than a stark price difference. (The GS costs $59,045 and the Z06 fully loaded version we drove was a hair over $102,000.) Both are powerhouse cars for tearing up the roads. Yet, the Z06, with its 505-horsepower engine, runs up to about 7500RPM before you need to shift. The GS we drove revs to about 6600 RPM before you need to shift. An automatic fuel shut-off prevents engine problems if you push it too far. That’s a fairly minor difference in most driving conditions, but helps explain the difference.

Keeping it under control

The GS is also more of a touring car, meaning it has a smoother ride and a forgiving suspension. There’s a selector for Touring or Sport. Apart from the technical explanations that Chevy provides about adaptive suspensions and a chunkier feel in Sport mode, the reality is that both are smooth. In Sport mode, the GS seems to hug the road a bit more, especially around very tight corners. No vehicle we’ve tested quite matched the Audi A8 in terms of making corners feel like you are driving straight (there is just no strain to the driver), but the Corvette GS matched our perception on the Audi A7 that the car makes you want to take corners even faster just for a little extra thrill.

(For those who care how the suspension actually works: it uses a special hydraulic fluid that changes viscosity when an electromagnetic field is applied – thicker for performance, looser for comfort.)

2011-Corvette-passenger-side
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Chevy added some extra engineering to hit home the point that the Corvette is meant for people who like to drive. Without going into all of the technical terms they use, here’s what the experience is like. For braking, the GS eases you to a standstill rather than making the vehicle feel like it will jerk to a stop. That’s important for spirited driving because the brakes are not touchy at all, yet they respond when you need them to. The brakes never got hot either, even after driving for several hours on curvy roads at fairly high speeds.

The GS has launch control, which is designed not so much as driving in a blizzard as keeping all four tires on the road evenly and adding extra power when you make jack-rabbit starts. Okay, we know that works now. The GS actually did a better job of keeping the vehicle straight and sure on the road from a starting position when we floored the accelerator. With the Z06, all of that power meant we slid out a few times.

More than just a fast ride

In terms of tech features, the Corvette has an impressive array of accoutrements: a large touchscreen for controlling music and with built-in navigation; OnStar for both getting routes from an Advisor and for post-collision support; and Bluetooth for hands-free calling using your own smartphone. There are a few missing ingredients, though: The GS does not have a back-up camera, so you have to watch out for that teenager driving too fast at Walmart a bit more closely. There are few luxury amenities like adaptive cruise control or blind spot detection, but most drivers will be having too much fun to care.

2011-Corvette-hood-2
Image used with permission by copyright holder

However, there are a few minor grievances on the GS model. One is that the automatic convertible top takes a while to go up and down – we counted about 15 seconds. There’s a brief pause as the rear compartment folds open and closed. Novice drivers might have a hard time finding the button for controlling the top, since it is positioned to the left of the steering column. Another slight oddity is that the parking brake actually still looks like it is engaged even when you have pushed it all the way forward. That’s something you get used to, but new drivers might keep taking second glances at it. Also, the trunk on the GS tends to not shut all the way – you have to give it an extra push. None of these issues are deal breakers by any means.

Verdict

The ultimate question is this: is the 2011 Chevy Grand Sport Convertible worth the price? Yes – every penny. The vehicle has an amazingly sleek styling that rivals many European models. It is an American icon of the roadway. Sure, there are muscle cars, and Ford makes the GT500 that is in a similar vein. You’ll spend several tens of thousands more for an actual Porsche 911 (e.g., around $90,000). This is the vehicle you want for fun on the road. Just watch that grille when you go to Walmart.

Photos courtesy of Jamie Allen Larson

2011 Chevrolet Corvette Grand Sport Convertible photo gallery

2011-Corvette-rear
John Brandon
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Tesla, Warner Bros. dodge some claims in ‘Blade Runner 2049’ lawsuit, copyright battle continues
Tesla Cybercab at night

Tesla and Warner Bros. scored a partial legal victory as a federal judge dismissed several claims in a lawsuit filed by Alcon Entertainment, a production company behind the 2017 sci-fi movie Blade Runner 2049, Reuters reports.
The lawsuit accused the two companies of using imagery from the film to promote Tesla’s autonomous Cybercab vehicle at an event hosted by Tesla CEO Elon Musk at Warner Bros. Discovery (WBD) Studios in Hollywood in October of last year.
U.S. District Judge George Wu indicated he was inclined to dismiss Alcon’s allegations that Tesla and Warner Bros. violated trademark law, according to Reuters. Specifically, the judge said Musk only referenced the original Blade Runner movie at the event, and noted that Tesla and Alcon are not competitors.
"Tesla and Musk are looking to sell cars," Reuters quoted Wu as saying. "Plaintiff is plainly not in that line of business."
Wu also dismissed most of Alcon's claims against Warner Bros., the distributor of the Blade Runner franchise.
However, the judge allowed Alcon to continue its copyright infringement claims against Tesla for its alleged use of AI-generated images mimicking scenes from Blade Runner 2049 without permission.
Alcan says that just hours before the Cybercab event, it had turned down a request from Tesla and WBD to use “an icononic still image” from the movie.
In the lawsuit, Alcon explained its decision by saying that “any prudent brand considering any Tesla partnership has to take Musk’s massively amplified, highly politicized, capricious and arbitrary behavior, which sometimes veers into hate speech, into account.”
Alcon further said it did not want Blade Runner 2049 “to be affiliated with Musk, Tesla, or any Musk company, for all of these reasons.”
But according to Alcon, Tesla went ahead with feeding images from Blade Runner 2049 into an AI image generator to yield a still image that appeared on screen for 10 seconds during the Cybercab event. With the image featured in the background, Musk directly referenced Blade Runner.
Alcon also said that Musk’s reference to Blade Runner 2049 was not a coincidence as the movie features a “strikingly designed, artificially intelligent, fully autonomous car.”

Read more
Audi halts vehicle deliveries to the U.S. as it mulls impact of tariffs
2021 Audi Q5

If you’d been thinking of buying an Audi, now might be the time.  The German brand, owned by the Volkswagen Group, has announced it would halt shipments to the U.S. in the wake of President Donald Trump’s 25% tariffs on all imported vehicles.
Audi is currently holding cars that arrived after the tariffs took effect, on April 3, in U.S. ports. But it still has around 37,000 vehicles in its U.S. inventory, which should be able to meet demand for about two months, according to Reuters.
Automakers on average hold enough cars to meet U.S. demand for about three months, according to Cox Automotive.
Audi should be particularly affected by the tariffs: The Q5, its best-selling model in the U.S., is produced in Mexico, while other models, such as the A3, A4, and A6 are produced in Germany.
Holding shipments is obviously a temporary measure to buy time for Audi and parent company Volkswagen. If tariffs stay in place, vehicle prices would likely have to go up accordingly, unless some production is shifted to the U.S. Volkswagen already has a plant in Chattanooga, Tennessee, and is planning a new plant in South Carolina. That latter plant, however, isn’t expected to be operational until 2027 and is currently dedicated to building electric vehicles for VW’s Scout Motors brand.
Other global automakers have also taken drastic measures in response to Trump’s tariffs. Jaguar Land Rover on April 5 said it is pausing shipments of its its UK-made cars to the United States this month. The British sports-luxury vehicle maker noted that the U.S. market accounts for nearly a quarter of its global sales, led by the likes of Range Rover Sports, Defenders, and Jaguar F-PACE.
And on April 3, Nissan, the biggest Japanese vehicle exporter to the United States, announced it will stop taking new U.S. orders for two Mexican-built Infiniti SUVs, the QX50 and QX55.

Read more
Waymo faces questions about its use of onboard cameras for AI training, ads targeting
Two people exit a Waymo taxi.

In an iconic scene from the 2002 sci-fi film Minority Report, on-the-run Agent John Anderton, played by Tom Cruise, struggles to walk through a mall as he’s targeted by a multitude of personalized ads from the likes of Lexus, Guinness and American Express, everytime hidden detectors identify his eyes.
It was clearly meant as a warning about a not-so-desirable dystopian future.
Yet, 23 years later that future is at least partlially here in the online world and threatens to spread to other areas of daily life which are increasingly ‘connected’, such as the inside of cars. And the new testing grounds, according to online security researcher Jane Manchun Wong, might very well be automated-driving vehicles, such as Waymo’s robotaxis.
On X, Wong unveiled an unreleased version of Waymo’s privacy policy that suggests the California-based company is preparing to use data from its robotaxis, including interior cameras, to train generative AI models and to offer targetted ads.
“Waymo may share data to improve and analyze its functionality and to tailor products, services, ads, and offers to your interests,” the Waymo’s unreleased privacy statement reads. “You can opt out of sharing your information with third parties, unless it’s necessary to the functioning of the service.”
Asked for comments about the unreleased app update, Waymo told The Verge that it contained “placeholder text that doesn’t accurately reflect the feature’s purpose”.
Waymo’s AI-models “are not designed to use this data to identify individual people, and there are no plans to use this data for targeted ads,” spokesperson Julia Ilina said.
Waymo’s robotaxis, which are operating on the streets of San Francisco, Los Angeles, Phoenix and Austin, do contain onboard cameras that monitor riders. But Ilina says these are mainly used to train AI models for safety, finding lost items, check that in-car rules are followed, and to improve the service.
The new feature is still under development and offers riders an opportunity to opt out of data collection, Ilina says.
But as we all get used to ads targeting based on everything that’s somehow connected to the web, it seems a once-distant vision of the future may be just around the corner.

Read more