Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Cars
  3. Car Reviews

Joyride: 2014 Dodge Dart Rallye 2.4

By

The Dart is a charismatic little car. Thanks to its Alfa Romeo roots, the Dart is handsome and fun to drive – especially if you drive like an Italian.

The Dodge Dart couldn’t be more American, in that it is an immigrant.

Recommended Videos

In fact, the little Dodge is based off an Alfa Romeo Giulietta, and its engines come from Fiat. But don’t let that put you off. Thanks to its feisty Italian origins and the $1-billion-plus that Chrysler spent adapting to the U.S. market, the Dart is a melting pot, and a rather fun one at that.

This charismatic little car may be lacking refinement, but it makes up for it in sheer fun.

Soul, passion, and shouting

The Dart Rallye delivered to me announced its bad intentions so loudly, they could be seen from space, thanks to the cornea achingly bright “Header Orange” paint job.

Fortunately, the Dart wasn’t all bark and no bite. The Rallye I tested featured the 2.4-liter, 184-horsepower Tigershark engine. This is good enough for a peppy 0 to 60 time of around eight seconds. But the joy of driving the Dart is not in raw acceleration, but in the way it handles and feels.

Thanks to the Alfa connection, the Dart is one of the liveliest small cars in the U.S. market. The steering is both fast and direct, and the car changes direction like a flea. Unfortunately, the suspension has been slightly detuned for the States. The result is body roll and understeer when you hammer it through a corner.

These things are technically flaws, but, to me, they actually add to the driving experience. The car requires input and effort to drive, but it rewards you with some hair-on-fire fun. There are very few electronic nannies getting between you and the road, which makes the Dart the happy exception to the blandification (my word) of most cheap cars.

The Dart Rallye requires input and effort to drive, but it rewards you with some hair-on-fire fun.

Your average small car might be nice to drive, but so lacking in personality that it is like trying to plow through a big bowl of plain oatmeal. Good for you, but hardly fun. The Dart on the other hand is like a big plate of jalapenos; you might get burned,but you are going to get a hell of a lot more excitement out of it.

To really get the most out of this car, I wouldn’t choose the 2.4-liter. It’s a decent enough engine, but at 27 combined mpg, the mileage is merely average and the performance doesn’t quite make up for it.

Instead I would go for the 1.4-liter FIRE MultiAir Turbo with a manual transmission. This engine delivers an EPA rated 32 mpg (though actual use suggests a figure of more like 35). Better yet, this is the perfect engine to appreciate the car’s Alfa roots. E.g. rev the valves off, and wave your arms around. Trust me, it is the way to enjoy this car.

A box of toys?

Thankfully, Dodge hasn’t skimped out on the toys. My $22,250 Dart came with an 8.4-inch Uconnect touchscreen, a reverse camera, navigation, satellite radio, split folding rear seats and a very nice six speaker stereo system.

As Digital Trends has said before, Uconnect is one of our favorite infotainment systems. In fact, the system on the Dart is downright better than the ones on plenty of $200,000 hyper-luxury cars. Most of these features are wrapped up in a very well designed dash and infotainment cluster.

In the Rallye, this unit is surrounded by hand-stitched leather. The effect looks good, and provides a sense of class and quality. There is also quantity; the interior of the Dart is shockingly large compared to the overall size of the car.

That being said, the interior is not all good. Despite the price, the Dart lacks true climate control. Not only that, but some of the interior materials are decidedly down-market. The door panels and center console are both made of scratchy black plastic, and the cloth upholstery hangs on to dog hair and dirt like nothing else I have ever seen. I never even had a dog in the car! These are hardly unforgivable sins. But at a list price of more than $22,000, they let the Dart down in the face of the opposition.

Despite the occasionally cheap feel, Dodge has not cut corners on safety. The Dart rates a five star overall score from the NHTSA.

Conclusion

Despite the rough edges, the Dart is still an appealing car. It has a ton of charisma, with the Rallye – and even without the orange paint – the Dart stands out in a crowd. It has just the right amount of styling to make it fun, without being ridiculous.

Likewise, you are never going to confuse the Dart for anything else when it comes time to drive it. The excellent chassis and suspension give the Dart a real edge on the bland competition. And, with the right attitude, it can be far more fun than even much more expensive options.

The real challenge for the Dart is overcoming the quality and reputation of the opposition – for instance a base model VW Golf is available for the same price. In that sense, Dodge has its work cut out for it. The Dart, though, is making real inroads and a midlife refresh might be enough to really bring this car together.

Highs

  • Nimble and exuberant chassis that loves going fast
  • Excellent Uconnect infotainment system
  • Very good safety rating
  • Handsome styling

Lows

  • Mediocre fuel economy from the 2.4-liter engine
  • Cheap feeling interior materials
Topics
Peter Braun
Peter Braun
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Peter is a freelance contributor to Digital Trends and almost a lawyer. He has loved thinking, writing and talking about cars…
Toyota shifts gears: 15 New EVs and a million cars by 2027
Front three quarter view of the 2023 Toyota bZ4X.

After years of cautiously navigating the electric vehicle (EV) market, Toyota is finally ramping up its commitment to fully electric vehicles.
The Japanese automaker, which has long relied on hybrids, is now planning to develop about 15 fully electric models by 2027, up from five currently. These models will include vehicles under the Toyota and Lexus brands, with production expected to reach 1 million units annually by that year, according to a report from Nikkei.
This strategy marks a significant shift for Toyota, which has thus far remained conservative in its approach to electric cars. The company sold just 140,000 EVs globally in 2024—representing less than 2% of its total global sales. Despite this, Toyota is aiming for a much larger presence in the EV market, targeting approximately 35% of its global production to be electric by the end of the decade.
The Nikkei report suggests the company plans to diversify its production footprint beyond Japan and China and expanding into the U.S., Thailand, and Argentina. This would help mitigate the impact of President Donald Trump’s 25% tariffs on all car imports, as well as reduce delivery times. Toyota is also building a battery plant in North Carolina.
For now, Toyota has only two fully electric vehicles on the U.S. market: The bZ4X  and the Lexus RZ models. The Japanese automaker is expected to introduce new models like the bZ5X and a potential electric version of the popular Tacoma pickup.
Separately, Toyota and Honda, along with South Korea’s Hyundai, all announced on April 4 that they would not be raising prices, at least over the next couple of months, following the imposition of U.S. tariffs. According to a separate Nikkei report, Toyota’s North American division has told its suppliers that it will absorb the extra costs of parts imported from Mexico and Canada. Another 25% for automotive parts imported to the U.S. is slated to come into effect on May 3.

Read more
Tesla, Warner Bros. dodge some claims in ‘Blade Runner 2049’ lawsuit, copyright battle continues
Tesla Cybercab at night

Tesla and Warner Bros. scored a partial legal victory as a federal judge dismissed several claims in a lawsuit filed by Alcon Entertainment, a production company behind the 2017 sci-fi movie Blade Runner 2049, Reuters reports.
The lawsuit accused the two companies of using imagery from the film to promote Tesla’s autonomous Cybercab vehicle at an event hosted by Tesla CEO Elon Musk at Warner Bros. Discovery (WBD) Studios in Hollywood in October of last year.
U.S. District Judge George Wu indicated he was inclined to dismiss Alcon’s allegations that Tesla and Warner Bros. violated trademark law, according to Reuters. Specifically, the judge said Musk only referenced the original Blade Runner movie at the event, and noted that Tesla and Alcon are not competitors.
"Tesla and Musk are looking to sell cars," Reuters quoted Wu as saying. "Plaintiff is plainly not in that line of business."
Wu also dismissed most of Alcon's claims against Warner Bros., the distributor of the Blade Runner franchise.
However, the judge allowed Alcon to continue its copyright infringement claims against Tesla for its alleged use of AI-generated images mimicking scenes from Blade Runner 2049 without permission.
Alcan says that just hours before the Cybercab event, it had turned down a request from Tesla and WBD to use “an icononic still image” from the movie.
In the lawsuit, Alcon explained its decision by saying that “any prudent brand considering any Tesla partnership has to take Musk’s massively amplified, highly politicized, capricious and arbitrary behavior, which sometimes veers into hate speech, into account.”
Alcon further said it did not want Blade Runner 2049 “to be affiliated with Musk, Tesla, or any Musk company, for all of these reasons.”
But according to Alcon, Tesla went ahead with feeding images from Blade Runner 2049 into an AI image generator to yield a still image that appeared on screen for 10 seconds during the Cybercab event. With the image featured in the background, Musk directly referenced Blade Runner.
Alcon also said that Musk’s reference to Blade Runner 2049 was not a coincidence as the movie features a “strikingly designed, artificially intelligent, fully autonomous car.”

Read more
Audi halts vehicle deliveries to the U.S. as it mulls impact of tariffs
2021 Audi Q5

If you’d been thinking of buying an Audi, now might be the time.  The German brand, owned by the Volkswagen Group, has announced it would halt shipments to the U.S. in the wake of President Donald Trump’s 25% tariffs on all imported vehicles.
Audi is currently holding cars that arrived after the tariffs took effect, on April 3, in U.S. ports. But it still has around 37,000 vehicles in its U.S. inventory, which should be able to meet demand for about two months, according to Reuters.
Automakers on average hold enough cars to meet U.S. demand for about three months, according to Cox Automotive.
Audi should be particularly affected by the tariffs: The Q5, its best-selling model in the U.S., is produced in Mexico, while other models, such as the A3, A4, and A6 are produced in Germany.
Holding shipments is obviously a temporary measure to buy time for Audi and parent company Volkswagen. If tariffs stay in place, vehicle prices would likely have to go up accordingly, unless some production is shifted to the U.S. Volkswagen already has a plant in Chattanooga, Tennessee, and is planning a new plant in South Carolina. That latter plant, however, isn’t expected to be operational until 2027 and is currently dedicated to building electric vehicles for VW’s Scout Motors brand.
Other global automakers have also taken drastic measures in response to Trump’s tariffs. Jaguar Land Rover on April 5 said it is pausing shipments of its its UK-made cars to the United States this month. The British sports-luxury vehicle maker noted that the U.S. market accounts for nearly a quarter of its global sales, led by the likes of Range Rover Sports, Defenders, and Jaguar F-PACE.
And on April 3, Nissan, the biggest Japanese vehicle exporter to the United States, announced it will stop taking new U.S. orders for two Mexican-built Infiniti SUVs, the QX50 and QX55.

Read more