Skip to main content

Clash of Germany’s muscle car coupes: Audi RS 5 versus Mercedes C63 AMG Edition 507

The BMW M3 is a fantastic car. let’s be honest, though; if you are looking for a two-door sports coupe, getting an M3 is a bit … obvious, particularly when you consider what else is out there.

You don’t even have to look outside the borders of Deutschland to find meaningful M3 competition. Cars like the Audi RS 5 and the Mercedes C63 AMG Edition 507 aren’t just competitive with the iconic Bimmer; they are positively outstanding in their own right. But if you are going to drop $80,00 of your hard-earned dollars on a Teutonic power coupe, which one should you get? Worry not, Digital Trends is here to help.

Powertrains

Both the Audi and the Benz come packing some serious muscle. Although we’re deep in days of turbos and supercharges, both cars derive their god-like power form of naturally aspirated V8s. These throwbacks to the heyday of muscle cars may be old-school, but they use technical witchcraft to put out stunning amounts of power.

Yes the 4.2-liter V8 in the RS 5 might have originated in 1991, but saying it’s old fashioned is like saying Einstein is basically just an Australopithecus. This motor has evolved; and now it has more in common with the R8’s V10 than the original 4.2. Thanks to its evolution, this Teutonic typhoon puts out 450 horsepower and 316 pound-feet of tire-shredding torque.

This stunning engine revs like a race car engine all the way north of 8000 rpm … and sounds like an angry lion. But it also calms down when you want it to, which is nice when you are just trying to cruise home from work rather than give the old lady on the sidewalk a heart attack.

If the Audi’s engine is impressive, though, the hand-built V8 in the C63 AMG 507 is a living legend, all the more so because it is about to be retired.

The V8 displaces a GTO-like 6.2 liters and while Audi might be happy with 450 hp, the AMG blows by with a Porsche-punching 507 hp. Even more telling is the difference in torque: Audi 316, Mercedes 450. I guess there is something to that old saying: no replacement for displacement.

Every explosion in the combustion chamber of this mighty V8 feels and sounds like the world coming to an end, but they just keep coming as you are pulled into another dimension on a wave of German firepower.

It is no knock on the awesome engine in the Audi to say that the Mercedes takes the cake in this category.

Performance

While these two cars engines may have more in common than you might expect, how they deliver their performance is as different as night and day.

 The Mercedes C63 AMG 507’s engine hints at just how it delivers its performance. With 507 horsepower in a car that is the size of a Honda Civic, everything happens at a savage pace. 0 to 60 is conquered in 3.8 seconds. Even that doesn’t do justice to the sheer ferocity of the experience. The 507 will keep up this wild rate of acceleration all the way to 176 mph where it slams angrily into an electronic limiter. Limiter? Damn you Heinrich!

The Merc is no mere muscle car either, because on a track it handles like a dream … albeit a scary one. With rear-wheel drive, this car is game for everything from controlled oversteer to drifting. However, if you want to get the most of the C63 AMG, you had better be damned good, because asking the rear wheels to put down that much power is difficult.

Fortunately, as with all Mercedes, the chassis feels solid like it is carved from granite. Unfortunately, so does the suspension. It will take you around corners fast, but it will also take important spinal ligaments and disks with it. That is okay for a day of track driving, but drive it on the street and you will be putting your massage therapist’s kids through college.

The RS 5 is another thing all together. It’s not quite as fast, with 0 to 60 times reported as low as 3.9 or as high as 4.5 seconds, depending on the tester. Though that says more about the difficulty of doing a full bore start in an AWD car than it does about the RS 5 in particular.

 But if the C63 AMG 507 is carved from granite, then the Audi is carved from LeBron James’s bones; it’s powerful but agile. The car’s response to the slightest input is simply sublime.  

Also because it puts its power down through the world-famous quattro all-wheel drive system and one of the best sports transmissions ever made, a seven speed double clutch DSG, the performance is much more accessible more often.

The RS 5 is great on the track, but it is even better where you are actually going to drive it: on the road. The car corners like it is glued to the road, and accelerates from any rpm and any gear like a cheetah on meth. That grip gives you the confidence to take the car to the limit, where – depending on the dynamic setting – you get either some safe if slightly boring understeer or much more fun liftoff oversteer.

If you are a truly expert driver, or you plan on living at your local track, then by all means get the Mercedes. If you are something more closely approximating a human being, then the Audi RS 5 is going to be faster in the real world.

The Audi RS 5 takes this category for its everyday, usable power.

The real world

Chances are, if you are looking at getting one of these cars rather than a two-seater sports car like a Porsche Cayman or Corvette Stingray, you want your sports coupe do be at least vaguely practical. So what do these cars have to offer in the real world?

As already stated, the Mercedes is not a comfortable car. Fast, good looking, and distinctive? Yes. For people with low bone density? No. It does still have some practical qualities. though. It might be very, very expensive, a fully loaded example costs around $87,000, but it will retain its value. It’s the last hurrah of the amazing 6.2-liter V8, which is being sent out to pasture. This makes the 507 an immediate collectors’ item.

Collectability aside, the Audi just has much more to offer in the practical field. For starters, the ride is much better. You can commute in this car without wearing a backbrace. And with 16 mpg city and 23 highway, compared to 13 and 19 mpg for the Mercedes, you can not only skip a few gas stations you can also avoid the gas-guzzler tax. That helps keep the price down, a fully loaded RS 5 costs around $77,000 – a full ten grand less than the Mercedes.

For that money you also get slightly better features in the RS 5. For instance ,I prefer Audi’s MMI system to Mercedes’ COMAND.

The crown here goes to the Audi RS 5.

The Checkered Flag:

For all of their similarities the Audi and Mercedes offer very different experiences. The Mercedes is a stripped-down supercar masquerading as a sports coupe. There are very few cars that deliver this kind of performance feel, and, with that amazing engine, this is a very special vehicle.

I have massive respect for anyone who drives a Mercedes C63 AMG Edition 507. It is a statement car.

That being said, if you handed me the money I would gaze longingly at the Mercedes dealership and then happily walk over to Audi and buy the RS 5. Not only is this a car that does more things, it is also faster in the real world of rain, speed bumps, and herniated disks. Combine that with the fact that it is also a lot cheaper than the Mercedes and you have your winner: The badass from Ingolstadt, the Audi RS 5. 

Editors' Recommendations

Peter Braun
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Peter is a freelance contributor to Digital Trends and almost a lawyer. He has loved thinking, writing and talking about cars…
Mercedes-Benz EQG: range, price, release date, and more
Concept image of the larger electric G-Wagon

The G-Class is going electric. We already knew that Mercedes-Benz was working on an electric, small-size G-Wagon, but it looks like the company is also working on a larger G-Class SUV, in the form of the EQG. In fact, Mercedes has gone as far as to show off a concept version of the off-roader.

While there's much we don't know about what will become the production model of the EQG, Mercedes has also shared a lot about it. Curious about whether the Mercedes-Benz EQG could be the EV for you? Here's everything we know so far.
Design
Fear not -- the EQG will retain many of the design aspects of the G-Class that you already know and love but with a modern face-lift. The EQG will keep the boxy design that gives the G-Class a classic look but with some additional modern styling, at least if the concept version is anything to go by.

Read more
Rivian R2 vs. Kia EV9: battle of affordable electric SUVs
Kia EV9 GT-Line Three Quarters

The long-awaited Rivian R2 has finally been announced, and it's an excellent option for those who want an electric SUV that doesn't completely break the bank. Sure, the R2 isn't cheap -- but it's a whole lot cheaper than most other EVs out there, especially when it comes to SUVs. But Rivian isn't the only company trying to tackle the problem of the budget electric SUV. The Kia EV9 is finally available, and it too offers a modern design and a range of helpful features.

Given the fact that the Rivian R2 and Kia EV9 are two electric SUVs in a similar price range, you might be wondering which is better for your needs. That's why we put the Rivian R2 and the Kia EV9 head-to-head.
Design
Both the Rivian R2 and the Kia EV9 are actual SUVs -- not crossovers pretending to be SUVs, like plenty of other EVs out there. The two vehicles offer big, boxy designs and plenty of interior space, making them excellent options for families or those who need that extra storage.

Read more
Rivian R2 vs R1S: How will Rivian’s cheaper SUV compare?
The front three-quarter view of a 2022 Rivian against a rocky backdrop.

Rivian has finally unveiled the R2, its long-awaited attempt at a more affordable electric SUV. The new vehicle may not be available just yet, but fans of Rivian's design aesthetics and feature set are already looking forward to being able to order the new car. The R2 is targeted at being a more affordable take on the electric SUV and will sit alongside the flagship-tier R1S.

Let's get this out of the way right now: The R1S is most likely going to be a better vehicle than the R2. Rivian isn't replacing the R1S with the R2 — it's releasing the R2 as a more affordable alternative, and there will be some compromises when buying the R2 over the R1S.

Read more