Skip to main content

Beware of this EV with pitiful charging speed — and others like it

With a proper setup, owning and driving an electric car can be a pretty seamless experience. If you have a charger at home, you’ll never really have to worry about charging — simply plug in at home, and your car will always have enough juice to get you through the day.

But that convenience can fall apart when you go on road trips. Whether it’s just a short jaunt out of town, or a cross-country adventure, you’ll suddenly have to keep track of nearby charging stations, and allot enough time to charge up your car. With a car like the Kia EV6 and Ioniq 5, that can be a relatively quick stop — especially if you find a 350-kilowatt charging station that can charge your car in a matter of 15 or 20 minutes.

But some cars don’t support anywhere near that charging speed. The Chevrolet Bolt EUV, for example, only supports a charging speed of 50kW — and on a recent three-day trip I took with it, that slow charging speed was painfully apparent.

How bad is it?

In day-to-day use, charging at 50kW is fine. After all, your home charger doesn’t charge at anywhere near that speed in the first place — it’s more for charging over long periods of time. And that’s actually a good thing. Fast charging all the time isn’t great for the battery, and in order to maximize the life span of your car, you should mostly rely on a home charger or a charger at your workplace. But if done only from time to time, using a fast charger will have little impact on your battery — and you shouldn’t worry about using one if you need to.

electric car charging
Image used with permission by copyright holder

So what does a maximum charging speed of 50kW mean? During my time with the Bolt, it meant that I wasn’t able to fully charge the car during a 30-minute lunch stop on a road trip — and was left walking around aimlessly while waiting. It also meant that I went to much greater lengths to charge when I could, including seeing if my hotel had a charger. When I learned it didn’t, I plugged the car in to a power outlet at the hotel overnight.

To be fair, these aren’t huge, life-changing issues. But they are issues — and when customers are unsure about buying an EV because of the hassle involved with charging, they’re issues that could affect EV adoption.

Cars to avoid

If you’re in the market for a new electric car, it’s worth making sure that charging speed is one of your considerations. Even if you don’t plan on fast-charging all that much, I guarantee that you’ll need to at some point — and when you do, you don’t want to have to wait around for longer than you have to.

Chevrolet Bolt EUV
Christian de Looper / Digital Trends

Thankfully, most new electric cars support charging speeds of at least 150kW, which is fine for most use, and should get you to 80% charge in around 30 minutes or less.

But some cars don’t reach those heights, and the Bolt EV and Bolt EUV are top of that list. I actually really enjoyed driving the Bolt EUV for the last week — it offers excellent value for the money, and more space than the too-small-for-me Bolt EV. But the slower charging really killed that experience.

There are other culprits, too. The Mazda MX-30, for example, can only charge at up to 50kW — however it’s even less of a car that you might take out of town given the 100-mile range. That’s similar to the Mini Cooper SE Electric, which also only charges at 50kW. And there’s the Hyundai Kona Electric, which has a charging speed of a still-not-great 75kW.

So what should you look for? If you’re buying a car you might take on the road, I recommend ensuring that you buy one that can charge at 150kW or more. There are quite a few cars that don’t reach that — and most of them are on the cheaper end. Because of that, it might be hard to find one in your budget that charges at 150kW. But even if you can’t, it’s worth making sure that charging speed is one of your top considerations when you buy.

Editors' Recommendations

Christian de Looper
Christian’s interest in technology began as a child in Australia, when he stumbled upon a computer at a garage sale that he…
2024 Dodge Charger Daytona reinvents the muscle car for the EV era
Front three quarter view of the 2024 Dodge Charger Daytona coupe.

Dodge is finally getting into the EV game, and what better way to start than with a new version of the Charger? While seemingly tailor-made for an electric car, the Charger name also carries the weight of heritage. That led Dodge to take a very different approach with its first EV.

Arriving later this year (with pricing to be determined), the 2024 Dodge Charger Daytona is the replacement for the old gasoline Charger sedan and Dodge Challenger coupe. It tries to appeal to fans of those cars with retro styling, muscle-car sound effects, and an emphasis on performance over efficiency. And if that doesn’t work, Dodge plans to sell a gasoline version as well.
A design straight out of the 1960s

Read more
Here’s how Ford will give EV customers Tesla Supercharger access
Ford EVs at a Tesla Supercharger station.

Ford announced last year that it would adopt the Tesla North American Charging Standard (NACS) for EV fast charging, granting Ford drivers access to the Tesla Supercharger network. Now, the automaker is providing a little more detail on exactly how that will work.

In the original May 2023 announcement, Ford said owners of existing EVs — which use the Combined Charging Standard (CCS) instead of NACS — would be able to charge at Supercharger stations via an adapter. Today, the automaker announced that the adapter developed by Tesla is now available to order. EV owners can order one free adapter per vehicle through Ford's website between now and June 30. The adapter will otherwise retail for $230. Ford plans to begin building new vehicles with NACS connectors in the near future.

Read more
Some on Apple’s failed car project reportedly had a cruel name for it
Apple Fifth Avenue Store Apple Logo

Apple reportedly canceled its electric car project earlier this week, ending around a decade of research and development on the ambitious project.

While we knew the tech giant had spent billions on its efforts, a New York Times report on Wednesday put a precise figure on it: $10 billion. It’s an astonishing amount of money for a project that will never see the light of day, and even more so when you consider that many of those working on it apparently suspected that the endeavor would come to nothing.

Read more