Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Cars
  3. News

SEC investigating Tesla for possible securities law violation, report says

Add as a preferred source on Google

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is investigating whether Tesla violated securities laws by failing to report the fatal May 7 crash of a Model S electric car that occurred when the company’s Autopilot autonomous-driving system was engaged, according to The Wall Street Journal (subscription required). The information comes from an anonymous source said to have knowledge of the matter.

Tesla reported the crash, which killed 40-year-old Joshua Brown when he collided with a semi truck on a Florida road, to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). But it didn’t disclose the crash to investors in a securities filing. The SEC is investigating whether it should have disclosed the crash as a “material event,” a development that investors might consider important. A Tesla spokesperson told Digital Trends that the company has not received any communication from the SEC on this matter, and referred to a blog post stating that the crash was not material to investors.

Recommended Videos

That post was written in response to a recent Fortune article questioning whether Tesla should have disclosed the crash before a major stock offering that took place just days later. Not knowing of the purported SEC investigation, Fortune argued that Tesla sat on news of the crash until after the stock offering.

Read more: Does Tesla have blood on its hands? The complex morality of autonomy

In its blog post, Tesla countered that there was no confirmation Autopilot was the cause of the crash. Even if it was, the company said, a single crash was not material to investors because it is a “statistical inevitability” that does not affect the performance metrics for Autopilot Tesla advertised to investors.

The NHTSA is investigating the May 7 crash to determine whether Autopilot was the cause. Tesla has been careful not to specifically assign blame to the driver, but has reiterated that the system is only in the beta stage, and that drivers using it need to keep their full attention on the road. This is something Tesla has said since launching Autopilot last year, but a quick scan of YouTube shows that not all drivers have heeded that warning.

Since news of the fatal crash broke, reports of other crashes involving Autopilot have surfaced. The NHTSA is investigating a second crash in which a Model X rolled over after a hitting a guardrail. A third crash, also involving a Model X, was reported on the Tesla Motors Club forum earlier this week, although the NHTSA has not commented on it. There were no major injuries reported in these two Model X crashes.

Stephen Edelstein
Stephen is a freelance automotive journalist covering all things cars. He likes anything with four wheels, from classic cars…
Chery’s latest EV packs flagship tech for the price of a base Tesla, but you can’t buy it
Here's everything packed into Exeed's 2027 Exlantix ES, from its 27-sensor autonomous driving suite to its 860 km range, all starting under $31,000.
Car, Transportation, Vehicle

Chery's premium arm just dropped a sedan that makes you wonder why American EVs cost twice as much for half the tech.

Exeed's 2027 Exlantix ES ships with a driver-assist system called Falcon 700. It is built around an Nvidia Orin-Y chip and a genuinely stacked sensor suite.

Read more
A new AI model wants self-driving cars to think before they swerve
Forget guessing games, this self-driving AI actually shows its work.
Self driving car

Self-driving cars have gotten pretty good at driving. The harder problem is teaching them to drive safely in situations nobody planned for. We have heard horror stories of self-driving cars, behaving erratically in emergency situations, often times delaying first responders from reaching the scene.

A team at Seoul National University, led by professor Jun Won Choi from the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, thinks they have cracked part of that puzzle with a new AI model called SafeDrive. The research was recently selected as a highlight paper at CVPR 2026, a distinction that goes only to roughly 3% of all submissions.

Read more
Your next car’s software update could become its biggest security risk
Your next car could receive updates like your smartphone. That's also becoming a cybersecurity nightmare.
OTA technology allows manufacturers to remotely deliver software updates.

Modern cars are no longer machines that stay the same after they leave the showroom. Increasingly, they're becoming software-defined vehicles that receive new features, bug fixes, and security patches wirelessly, much like smartphones. But while over-the-air (OTA) updates have made vehicle maintenance easier and cheaper, cybersecurity experts are warning that the same technology could also become one of the automotive industry's biggest security challenges.

Researchers and policymakers are now calling for stronger oversight as connected vehicles become increasingly dependent on remote software updates. Their concern isn't just about hackers stealing personal data. It's about someone potentially interfering with the operation of a moving vehicle.

Read more