Skip to main content

U.K. Court dismisses Tesla’s suit against Top Gear – what’s your call?

 Tesla Roadster

Apparently Jeremy Clarkson can do whatever he wants, no matter how misleading or unfair it might be.

Recommended Videos

In 2008, Clarkson and his cohort drove a Teslas Roadster around the track at racing speeds, trying to chase the Lotus Elise the Tesla Roadster was based on. It made for an impressive video. The virtually silent all-electric Roadster went toe-to-toe with the Elise for quite a while, giving the sense that Tesla had succeeded where so many other electric car companies had failed. Tesla, it seemed, had built a fun, sporty electric sports car.

But the feeling of electric-powered euphoria didn’t last long.

The first Roadster’s batteries went flat after about 50 minutes. So Top Gear popped out a second Roadster test car. The electric motor on that one quickly overheated on the track. Then the brakes on the first, which had been charging in a garage, failed before filming could resume. These seemingly insurmountable failures resulted in an unforgettable image of the Top Gear crew being forced to push the cars off the track at the end of the video.

Tesla founder Elon Musk alleged the stunt cost Tesla $171,000 in potential sales – and filed suit. Watch the Top Gear video

A United Kingdom court of appeals just dismissed Tesla’s libel lawsuit against the BBC’s Top Gear last week saying that no “reasonable viewer” would have been tricked into thinking the Tesla Roadster’s range was less than the 200-mile estimate.

In a true show of Top Gear-style bravado, Andy Wilman, executive producer of the automotive entertainment program, said in an emailed statement: “I am pleased that the Appeal Court has upheld the previous ruling and the case has been struck out. I’d also like to apologize to the judges for making them have to watch so much Top Gear.”

Despite what the U.K.’s court system might think, there’s plenty of evidence that negative press has affected Tesla irreparably.

Just last month, New York Times reporter John M. Broder tested the Tesla Model S claiming it was incapable of achieving the advertised range. Tesla’s shares subsequently fell more than nine-percent from $39.24 to $35.58, since Feb. 8, the day the Times article was first printed, according to Bloomberg.

While we love Top Gear and the silliness the program often pulls, we agree with Tesla’s complaints. We feel the testing was unfair. Jeremy wasn’t totally off-kilter trying to compare the Telsa to a Lotus, as the two are related. But a direct comparison misses a big point: they’re still different beasts.

Electric cars are still in their infancy and can’t be driven like standard gasoline cars. Electric car buyers have to know from the outset that the technology is imperfect and will need to be treated accordingly.

Digital Trends asks: Was the Top Gear comparison – and the way the video was made – fair to Tesla? Leave a comment below.

Nick Jaynes
Former Automotive Editor
Nick Jaynes is the Automotive Editor for Digital Trends. He developed a passion for writing about cars working his way…
I tried an e-bike for the first time and now I’m hooked
It’s not about being a 'bike person', it’s about finding small upgrades to everyday life
A woman sitting on the Aventon Pace 4

Before this year, I’d never even touched an e-bike before, and the thought of riding one was never on my radar. With life already in constant motion thanks to two toddlers, biking wasn’t something I ever considered adding to the mix.

I’d always assumed e-bikes were for hardcore commuters or serious cyclists, not someone like me. I wasn’t looking for a big lifestyle change. I just wanted a quicker way to get to the park so we’d have more time to play before dinner.

Read more
This week in EV tech: Audi exemplifies auto industry’s EV holding pattern
Close-up of 2025 Audi SQ5 grille, headlight, and badge.

The road to the future runs through the present, and it’s not a straight line. This week, we’re focusing on how Audi is negotiating the twists and turns on the way to an electrified future. EVs are here to stay at Audi, but a gasoline crossover SUV is still the automaker’s bestselling model, and it’s not ready to risk those sales just yet. That’s why the 2025 Audi Q5 received a top-to-bottom overhaul for this model year, bringing its tech features and styling up to date without altering the what has proven to be a very popular package. By maintaining parallel lineups of electric and internal-combustion cars, Audi hopes to give customers more choices. But that doesn’t completely level the playing field. The new Q5 may have yesterday’s powertrain, but Audi isn’t holding back on tech. It features the same electrical architecture, operating system, and three-screen dashboard display as the latest Audi EVs, like the Q6 e-tron. So aside from a little engine noise, there’s little difference in what you can see and interact with from the driver’s seat. It’s not just the infotainment systems. The Q5 and Q6 e-tron are close in size, with similar space for passengers across their two rows of seats. The Q6 e-tron has a bit more cargo space, but not as much as you’d think given the lack of a bulky engine, transmission, and driveshafts. The two SUVs also have similar styling but, having now driven both, we can say that the Q5 is the more pleasant of the two.

More than a difference of powertrain tech

Read more
Take a peek inside the factory making tomorrow’s ride
A Zoox robotaxi.

Amazon-owned Zoox has opened its first facility producing fully autonomous robotaxis. 

A video (above) released by the California-based company offers a peek inside the factory, which, when it reaches full capacity, could roll out as many as 10,000 autonomous vehicles per year.

Read more