Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. News

‘AI-powered’ shopping app alleged to have been human-powered

Add as a preferred source on Google
A smartphone with "shop now" on the display.
Nataliya Vaitkevich/Pexels

You may have occasionally joked about how companies these days seem to be falling over themselves to launch something, anything, that has AI, even just a little bit, somewhere under the hood. That way they can run dazzling ad campaigns that make the product sound like it’s at the cutting-edge, powered by this new-fangled technology that everyone’s talking about.

But one tech founder, Albert Saniger, is now in hot water after being charged with making false claims about his company’s technology after it was found that his “AI-infused” universal shopping app was actually powered by a bunch of people in a Philippines call center.

Recommended Videos

Saniger, the 35-year-old founder and former CEO of Nate, was this week indicted for defrauding investors who funded the shopping app, according to a release from the U.S. Department of Justice.

The Nate shopping app launched seven years ago and raised more than $50 million from various investors. Saniger allegedly defrauded investors by making claims about his company’s purported AI capabilities while covertly employing workers to create the illusion of technological automation.

Nate’s founder marketed the software as a universal shopping cart app that simplified the e-commerce experience by allowing customers to skip the checkout process on retail websites, with Nate supposedly using AI to autonomously navigate the checkout process, completing it on behalf of the shopper in a single tap.

It meant that if a shopper found, for example, a pair of shoes they wanted to purchase on a particular e-commerce site, they could do so by opening the Nate app and clicking “buy.” The Nate app purported to take care of the remainder of the checkout process by using AI to select the appropriate size, enter billing and shipping information, and confirm the purchase.

The U.S. Attorney’s Office said that while Saniger had indeed acquired AI technology from a third party and hired a team of data scientists to develop it, Nate’s AI never achieved the ability to consistently complete e-commerce purchases. The tech founder is alleged to have concealed this from investors.

Rather than deploying AI, Nate instead relied on teams of human workers to manually process transactions in secret, mimicking actions that users believed was being carried out by AI.

Saniger is accused of having used “hundreds” of contractors located in a call center in the Philippines to manually complete purchases occurring over the Nate app, though during a busy holiday period, the company’s engineering team also developed bots to automate some of the transactions.

Acting U.S. Attorney Matthew Podolsky said of the alleged crime: “This type of deception not only victimizes innocent investors, it diverts capital from legitimate startups, makes investors skeptical of real breakthroughs, and ultimately impedes the progress of AI development.”

In 2023, the U.S. Federal Trade Commission told companies to watch their claims regarding the use of AI, warning them to avoid exaggeration and overpromising when it comes to announcing AI capabilities associated with their products.

Trevor Mogg
Contributing Editor
Not so many moons ago, Trevor moved from one tea-loving island nation that drives on the left (Britain) to another (Japan)…
Google’s new Magic Pointer Play Store listing reveals a Gemini shortcut built for Googlebooks
The unannounced app turns the cursor into a contextual AI tool for search, image creation, and shopping
Plant, Text, Business Card

Google has quietly published a new Play Store listing for Magic Pointer, an unannounced app built for Googlebooks. Updated on July 10, the app turns the cursor into a Gemini shortcut that can act on whatever a user selects on screen.

Magic Pointer can send an image to Lens, generate a related image, or surface a shopping action without forcing users to open a separate chatbot. Regular Android devices currently show as incompatible, so the listing offers an early preview rather than a broad release.

Read more
You can stop using AI, but this new report says you probably can’t escape it
A UK survey found that most people feel AI exposure is unavoidable, raising harder questions about consent, privacy, and whether opting out is still realistic
AI Chatbots

More people are trying to use less AI, but avoiding it altogether may already be impossible.

A survey of 2,055 UK adults found that 42% deliberately limit how much AI they use. Another 70% said avoiding AI exposure would be difficult or impossible, even when they actively wanted less of it.

Read more
The face on an AI interviewer may matter as much as the decision it makes
Researchers found that race and gender matching changed how fairly rejected applicants viewed an automated interview, even though everyone received the same outcome
File, Computer Hardware, Electronics

An AI hiring system can treat every applicant the same and still leave some people feeling targeted. Researchers found that rejected candidates judged an automated interview differently depending on the race and gender of the avatar delivering the result.

Around 220 participants completed a simulated interview for a fictional customer support role with one of four photorealistic AI avatars. Everyone was rejected, yet perceptions of fairness shifted with the interviewer’s appearance. An algorithm audit could miss that reaction because candidates don’t experience the system as raw code. They experience a face asking questions and judging their answers.

Read more