Skip to main content

AMD Ryzen 9 3900X review: The new king

After years of effort, AMD’s Ryzen 9 3900X finally robs Intel of its throne

AMD Ryzen 9 3900x
Dan Baker/Digital Trends

AMD’s launch of the original Ryzen was a big deal. After years of so-so chips, AMD was finally a good alternative to Intel. The company was pushing core counts higher and higher while working on the efficiency and per-clock performance issues that always held AMD back.

Now we have Ryzen 3000 and Zen 2, the true architectural sequel to the original Ryzen. With this new series of chips, AMD wants to not just match, but surpass, Intel. The Ryzen 9 3900X sits atop the pile of Ryzen 2 chips, and it’s an insanely powerful 12-core, 24-thread processor. Is it really a better buy than Intel’s Core i9-9900K?

More cores than you have fingers

High core counts have been the name of the game at AMD for years now, and it’s not relenting. The Ryzen 9 3900X is the first Ryzen processor from AMD to include 12 cores, up from the eight cores of the Ryzen 7 2700X from 2018. The core count of this new Ryzen 9 chip is reminiscent of AMD’s Threadripper.

AMD Ryzen 9 3900x
Dan Baker/Digital Trends

The Ryzen 9 3900X’s $499 price tag isn’t inexpensive. Value is traditionally AMD’s strength, but the Ryzen 9 3900X is not an affordable processor for a mid-range PC. Intel’s Core i9-9900K currently sells for $485 on Amazon, with its listed selling price on Intel’s website at $449. That means the 3900X can’t be slightly slower alternative to Intel’s flagship. AMD needs to bring the heat.

Alongside the 3900X, AMD also announced the Ryzen 7 3700X and Ryzen 5 3600X. There’s even an insane 16-core Ryzen 9 3950X on the near horizon. We’ll be tackling those in the future. For now, here’s how the specs stack up.

Intel Core i9-9900K AMD Ryzen 9 3900X AMD Ryzen 7 3700X AMD Ryzen 5 3600X
Process node 14nm 7nm 7nm 7nm
Cores 8 12 8 6
Threads 16 24 16 12
L2/L3 cache 2MB / 16MB 6MB / 64MB 5MB / 32MB 3MB/32MB
Base clock speed 3.6GHz 3.8GHz 3.6GHz 3.8GHz
Boost clock speed 4.7GHz (all cores) 5GHz (one core) 4.6GHz 4.4GHz 4.4GHz
Graphics Intel UHD Graphics 630 No No No
TDP 95w 105w 105w 95w

The 3900X’s advantage in memory caching is thanks to the 7nm Zen 2 architecture, as are the improvements in clock speed. All these processors are compatible with AMD’s AM4 socket platform, meaning you can happily upgrade your processor without having to toss out your entire motherboard.

Comparing clocks speeds and TDP ratings are great for marketing and spec sheets, but they don’t spell a complete picture of how a component actually performs.

Work those cores

In the past, we’ve had to choose between the raw, single-core power of Intel’s chips and the exponentially higher core counts of Ryzen. Until now, I thought the best compromise was the eight-core Intel Core i9-9900K. Who knew it could get so much better with four extra cores?

All our tests were performed on similar systems: 16GB of RAM, a fast NVMe M.2 SSD, and the monster RTX 2080 Ti for graphics. Of course, the processors and motherboards were different.

Now, on to the results.

I wasn’t surprised to see the 3900X dominate the 9900K in multi-core performance in benchmarks like Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R20. It’s ahead by leaps and bounds here, which is exactly what four extra cores will get you. You might not notice as drastic a difference as when jumping from four cores up to eight, but the Ryzen 9 3900X’s 50% core bump over the Core i9-9900K produces a nearly 50% increase in multi-core performance. 

I wanted to see just how this would work outside of benchmarks, so I did some H.265 media encoding in Handbrake. The result was 23% better 4K encoding speeds compared to Intel. That’s not the 50% improvement we saw in the benchmarks, but for an increase in a real-world application, that’s huge. Imagine encoding a 4K HDR movie. If the file needed an hour to encode on the Intel Core i9-9900K, it’d only take 46 minutes on the Ryzen 9 3900X.

AMD Ryzen 9 3900x
Dan Baker/Digital Trends

The multi-core gains are to be expected. More cores, more performance. AMD’s weakness has always been per-core performance. The Ryzen 3900X doesn’t keep up with the Core i9-9900K, but it comes dangerously close. It’s within 4% in Cinebench and within 10% in Geekbench.

AMD has closed the gap on the 9900K more than I thought possible, and nowhere is that more clear than in game performance.

World’s best gaming processor?

Intel has declared its Core i9-9900K the best gaming processor in the world. Critics scoffed at the high price at launch, but Intel’s claim was undeniably true. Though most games are only made with four cores in mind, its powerful single-core performance made it the default choice for high-end gaming.

The Ryzen 9 3900X challenges that claim, and from my tests, it may have stolen the crown from the 9900K’s head.

When comparing processors for gaming, I’m not looking for a huge swing one way or the other. The majority of processing in modern 3D games happens in graphics cards. So, to avoid GPU bottlenecks, I stocked our test systems with the RTX 2080 Ti, the most powerful GPU you can buy. Across the board, the Ryzen 9 3900X produces better framerates.

I started in 3DMark Time Spy, where the 3900X takes a small, 3% lead on the Core i9-9900K. It’s not substantial, but it’s not what I expected. That trend continued across the three games tested: Fortnite, Civilization VI, and Assassin’s Creed Odyssey. Out of the six gameplay scenarios tested (1080p in medium and low graphics setting), the 3900X was ahead in all but one. On average, the 3900X was around 5% faster. That’s a huge win for AMD and the Zen 2 architecture.

Look out, Intel

Ryzen 3000 and this first batch of new processors felt like a big moment when it was announced at Computex. Now that I have seen the numbers myself, I know it’s a big moment. The Ryzen 9 3900X not only emphasizes AMD’s strengths, it challenges the areas Intel has always reigned.

But this isn’t a closed case. Intel is quick to note that it’s still by far the first choice of gamers. Just look at recent Steam surveys and see Intel’s commanding lead. That lead has only continued to rise despite the release of Ryzen. A $499 12-core processor that beats out Intel’s best probably won’t effect the majority of gamers out there, but the impact this will have on mind share is what counts. The rest will trickle down.

For now, if you want the absolute best, there’s a new king in town. Its name is the Ryzen 9 3900X.

Editors' Recommendations

Luke Larsen
Senior Editor, Computing
Luke Larsen is the Senior editor of computing, managing all content covering laptops, monitors, PC hardware, Macs, and more.
Asus fights to save face after a huge AMD Ryzen controversy
Asus motherboards on display at Micro Center.

Asus has found itself in the crosshairs lately as its reputation has been questioned by a few big names in the PC hardware space. Due to reported problems with overvolting and Ryzen processors burning up as a result, some owners of Asus products may be asking themselves if their components are safe to use.

The company has now issued an official statement to address the problem. In the meantime, it appears that many buyers are choosing to return their Asus motherboards. But is the controversy surrounding Asus really to blame here?

Read more
AMD may be sticking to a controversial choice with Ryzen 8000
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D held between fingertips.

Zen 4 still feels quite new, but AMD is already preparing to launch its Zen 5 architecture in 2024, with AMD Ryzen 8000 processors now on the horizon.

New leaks shed some light on the upcoming chips, and while a lot is still uncertain, one thing is clear -- AMD is sticking to a somewhat controversial design choice that sets it apart from Intel: keeping the same core counts.

Read more
Some Ryzen CPUs are burning up. Here’s what you can do to save yours
AMD Ryzen 7000 processor with a visible bulge, next to a burnt motherboard socket.

If you already have one of AMD's best processors for gaming, such as the Ryzen 9 7950X3D or the Ryzen 7 7800X3D, both your CPU and your motherboard might be in trouble.

Several reports of the processor burning up have recently surfaced. While AMD hasn't made any statements, it's possible that a new BIOS update might be enough to keep your gear safe.

Read more