Skip to main content

AMD confusingly reveals minimum CPU specs for Oculus Rift

Update: Forbes writer Jason Evangelho reached out to to me on Twitter, pointing out that Forbes made no mistake on its initial reporting and that, instead, AMD had backpedaled on its original claims.

After Nvidia warned last month that only 13 million of the 1.3 billion+ PCs in the world would be capable of rendering VR, its primary competitor AMD has lifted the veil on its own set of recommendations on the technology. This time, however, we’re getting the minimum specs for a VR-ready CPU rather than for graphics cards.

Recommended Videos

AMD’s clarification is important for its fans, and for anyone considering its processors. Oculus’ official specifications, as well as its system requirement tool, currently exclude AMD processors. That’s because the Rift’s recommended specifications ask for a Core i5-4590, with no mention of the AMD equivalent.

This news stems from Jason Evangelho of Forbes who reported that, despite Oculus’ own hardware tester suggesting otherwise, both the FX and APU processor families are supported by headsets like the Rift.

Unfortunately, in a revision to the original post, Forbes admitted that AMD had backpedaled on its initial assertions and that only FX chips are guaranteed to be compatible with the Oculus Rift, and presumably HTC Vive as well, while the APU chips are still being validated. That doesn’t mean the APU chips aren’t capable of running VR, just that there may be a few hiccups along the process.

As ExtremeTech points out, even the forthcoming A10-7890K chip from AMD can’t compete in terms of sheer horsepower to some of Intel’s Core processors. Because AMD’s CPU catalog doesn’t quite reach the performance parity with Intel’s chips, AMD tends to put its multi-core hardware up against Intel processors donning a lower core count.

For that reason, if you plan on pairing your VR headset of choice with an Intel CPU, it’ll only need to be the Core i5-4590, a 3.3GHz quad-core combined with a 3.7GHz Turbo clock, 6MB of L2 cache, with no Hyper-Threading included.

If you’re going with AMD, any eight or six-core CPU with a base clock of at least 3.9GHz should be powerful enough to get you started. For the time being, though, AMD is only certain about FX-branded CPUs. Hopefully we’ll see the APU chip validation turn out positively so that more people can appreciate Virtual Reality as the Oculus Rift release date swiftly approaches.

Gabe Carey
A freelancer for Digital Trends, Gabe Carey has been covering the intersection of video games and technology since he was 16…
Apple’s secret Vision Pro controller suggests it’s finally taking VR gaming seriously
A person gaming on the Apple Vision Pro headset.

You would think that Apple’s Vision Pro headset would be the perfect platform for virtual reality (VR) gaming. After all, it has a top-notch processor, super-high-resolution displays, and both VR and augmented reality (AR) capabilities. In theory, that should make it a leading device for gamers.

The reality is, unfortunately, very different, with few popular gaming titles making it onto visionOS. And really, Apple’s headset is held back by one key weakness: its lack of proper VR controller support.

Read more
AMD’s most popular CPU is right around the corner
The AMD Ryzen 5 9600X between two finger tips.

AMD may soon expand its Zen 5 processor range with the Ryzen 5 9600. Typically, these budget-oriented CPUs find their homes in many PCs, gaming and otherwise, so this could be an interesting offering. How will it rank among some of the best processors? Here's what we know so far.

The information comes from X (Twitter) leaker Hoang Anh Phu, who sent out a message indicating that the AMD Ryzen 5 9600 will be available in late January. This tracks, because AMD is set to host a keynote during CES 2025 in early January, so a release date later that same month makes sense.

Read more
Everyone hates this AMD CPU, but I still use it in my PC
A small form factor build inside the Fractal Terra.

Gamers Nexus called it a "wasted opportunity." Hardware Unboxed declared it a "flop." Even in our own Ryzen 7 9700X review, I said the CPU doesn't have "enough meat on the bone to justify an upgrade." So, why does the Ryzen 7 9700X top the list of the best processors? And more importantly, why am I using one in my personal PC?

I'll do my best to answer these forced questions. The disappointment in the Ryzen 7 9700X isn't truly universal -- no opinions about PC hardware are -- but there's no doubt that it's the outcast in AMD's lineup of Ryzen 9000 CPUs. It's not great for gaming in the face of the Ryzen 7 9800X3D, and you can save $50 to $70 with the Ryzen 7 7700X while getting largely similar productivity performance. But AMD's trusty little Zen 5 octa-core is still at the heart of my high-end gaming PC, and I wouldn't have it any other way.
A flexible little devil

Read more