Skip to main content

Close to the Metal Ep. 10: Another year, another Intel generation

Close to the Metal Ep. 10: Another year, another Intel generation
When you’re planning CPU releases, you have to plan pretty far out. So when Intel releases a new processor generation, it’s not that much of a surprise, because they announced it at least a year prior. Still, Intel’s Seventh Generation Kaby Lake chips provide some notable benefits over their Skylake counterparts, even if they’re a step in a different direction for the company.

While there are a few under-the-hood changes, improved 4K video playback and editing capabilities are definitely the flashiest new feature debuting in Kaby Lake. With the introduction of the New Media Engine, a new section of execution units built from the company’s integrated graphics hardware. They’re specifically built for decoding video, like HEVC and VP9, at the hardware level, improving both performance and power efficiency.

There’s a small boost in speed as well, with Intel quoting a 12 percent performance boost in general productivity from the Core i7-6500U to the Core i7-7500U, with the number reaching as high as 19 percent in web browsing benchmarks.

Kaby Lake also brings with it a change in nomenclature to the lower-power chips. What were formerly Core m5 and Core m7 chips are now full Core i5 and Core i7 models, but with the same low 4.5 watt TDP, as long as “they perform like an i7.”

But a change in Intel’s process is looming over this generation, and it’s going to put a lot of pressure on it. Starting in 2007, Intel employed the Tick-Tock model, where the company would produce an architecture, then shrink it down, then produce a new architecture at that size, repeating the process every year or two. But last year, things had to shift as Intel was unable to keep up with the mounting pressures of ever-shrinking hardware. Kaby Lake is the first generation to break the mold, as the last phase a of a three-part cycle.

These chips will start showing up first in high-end laptops by the end of the year, before they start trickling down to the more basic mobile computers. We’ve been seeing a lot more laptops as of late with screens over 1,920 x 1,080, so improved battery life doing what most people do on a laptop – play on the web and watch movies – is a decent quality of life improvement.

Brad Bourque
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Brad Bourque is a native Portlander, devout nerd, and craft beer enthusiast. He studied creative writing at Willamette…
Not this again: Intel Arrow Lake may have instability issues
A render for an Intel Arrow Lake CPU.

Intel's Arrow Lake is just a couple of days from hitting the market, and we've been inundated with various reports and leaked benchmarks. Today's news doesn't sound good, though. YouTuber Moore's Law Is Dead reports that Arrow Lake, also referred to as Core Ultra 200-S, may have some instability issues -- much like what we've seen Intel battle for months on end with Raptor Lake.

Before we dive in, keep in mind that all of this is yet to be confirmed, and we're mere days away from finding out whether it's true or not. However, it could give some buyers a reason to hold off and read the reviews before preordering the CPUs. Moore's Law Is Dead talked about various reviewers and tech YouTubers who had something bad to say about Arrow Lake's stability. The issues are twofold: A wild discrepancy between benchmarks, and running into crashes.

Read more
Intel’s next laptop chips may have a secret weapon
Intel Core Ultra Series 2 Lunar Lake chipset.

An upcoming Intel graphics solution, namely the Intel Arc 140T, has recently been spotted on GFXBench. The most interesting bit is that it offers a noticeable performance advantage over the Xe2-based Arc 140V iGPU that recently made its appearance on Intel’s latest Lunar Lake mobile CPUs.

A post by X (formerly Twitter) user Michael (@miktdt) compares GFXbench scores of the Arc 140T with two Arc 140V SKUs—one with 16GB memory and the other with 8GB. The 8GB Arc 140V reached 6,613 frames with an average of 106.7 framers per second (fps), while the 16GB version achieved 6,839 frames at 110.3 fps. However, the Intel Arc 140T, equipped with 16GB of memory, excelled with 11,056 frames at an average of 178.3 fps, surpassing the 16GB Arc 140V by 62%, despite both GPUs sharing eight Xe cores.

Read more
Qualcomm counters Intel about its performance claims
Qualcomm's CEO presenting Snapdragon X Elite CPUs at Computex 2024.

In the year since Qualcomm first debuted its Snapdragon X Elite, the competition hasn't been silent. Intel released both Meteor Lake and Lunar Lake chips, the latter of which felt like a legitimate response to Qualcomm's advances in battery life and efficiency.

But Qualcomm isn't impressed by Intel's latest offerings.

Read more