Skip to main content

Facebook is using AI to make language translation nine times faster

Artificially intelligent systems are only getting better, and they’re likely to appear in our computers and on our phones more and more often over the next few years. Facebook has been using artificial intelligence and machine learning for various things — like its M digital assistant — but now the company is turning to AI for another purpose: translation.

Facebook’s research team has published a report on how artificial intelligence is a hefty nine times faster than traditional language translation software. Not only that, but the researchers have revealed that the source code for the translation software is open-source, so anyone can get their hands on it to verify the results.

Recommended Videos

The report highlights the use of convolutional neural networks (CNN) as opposed to recurrent neural networks (RNN), which translate sentences one word at a time in a linear order. The new architecture, however, can take words further down in the sentence into consideration during the translation process, which helps make the translation far more accurate. This actually marks the first time a CNN has managed to outperform an RNN in language translation, and Facebook now hopes to expand it to to cover more languages.

“Language translation is important to Facebook’s mission of making the world more open and connected, enabling everyone to consume posts or videos in their preferred language — all at the highest possible accuracy and speed,” said the company in a blog post.

Convolutional Neural Networks aren’t a totally new technology, but they haven’t really been applied to translation before. As a result of the new tech, Facebook can compute different aspects of a sentence at the same time, and as a result it can train its systems using a lot less computational power — which in turn results in faster translation. The system is also open source, meaning translation should get better across the web — not just in Facebook’s offerings.

Christian de Looper
Christian de Looper is a long-time freelance writer who has covered every facet of the consumer tech and electric vehicle…
T-Mobile’s parent company is making an AI Phone with Perplexity
Peplexity on Lock Screen of AI phone.

The year 2025 has seen nearly every smartphone brand tout the virtues of artificial intelligence. But with the exception of Google and its Gemini assistant on Pixel phones, we haven’t seen AI companies making an aggressive hardware push in the segment. That’s about to change.

T-Mobile’s parent company has announced plans for an “AI Phone” that is being developed in partnership with Perplexity. The AI company, which counts Nvidia and Jeff Bezos among its investors, will offer its eponymous AI tool for the phone.

Read more
xAI’s Grok-3 is free for a short time. I tried it, and I’m impressed
Grok-3 access option in the X mobile app.

xAI launched its Grok-3 AI chatbot merely a few days ago, but locked it behind a paywall worth $40 per month. Now, the company is offering free access to it, but only for a limited time. xAI chief, Elon Musk, says the free access will only be available for a “short time,” so it’s anyone’s guess how long that window is going to be.

For now, the only two features available to play around are Think and DeepSearch. Think is the feature that adds reasoning capabilities to Grok-3  interactions, in the same view as DeepThink on DeepSeek, Google’s Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking Experimental, and OpenAI’s o-series models.

Read more
Google puts military use of AI back on the table
First step of Gemini processing a PDF in Files by Google app.

On February 4, Google updated its “AI principles,” a document detailing how the company would and wouldn’t use artificial intelligence in its products and services. The old version was split into two sections: “Objectives for AI applications” and “AI applications we will not pursue,” and it explicitly promised not to develop AI weapons or surveillance tools.

The update was first noticed by The Washington Post, and the most glaring difference is the complete disappearance of any “AI applications we will not pursue” section. In fact, the language of the document now focuses solely on “what Google will do,” with no promises at all about “what Google won’t do.”

Read more