Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. News

Google and Mozilla step up Internet privacy effort with new “do not track” options

Aemon Malone
By

Google and Mozilla are working to get their respective Web browsers to comply with the Federal Communications Commission’s (FCC) recommendation for a “do not track” feature to allow Internet users to opt-out of online ad tracking.

Dozens of online ad companies already have self-regulated opt-out programs — including the 15 largest ad companies. However, the current opt-out services are far from a fool proof way of guarding privacy on the Internet. For one, the opt-out settings are easily lost; when a brower’s stored cookies are cleared, the opt-out settings are also done away with, too.

Recommended Videos

Another challenge to the effectiveness of the self-regulated opt-out programs is that it is difficult to keep settings up-to-date as new online advertisers are always popping up, meaning users constantly have to monitor their opt-out settings to make sure they’re current.

Related

“A better ‘Do Not Track’ mechanism is a browser extension that means you can easily opt out of personalized advertising from all participating ad networks only once and store that setting permanently,” wrote Google product managers Sean Harvey and Rajas Moonka in a blog post.

Google is calling its do not track feature “Keep My Opt-Outs.” The plug-in permanently stops ad companies — those that are a part of a self-regulated program — from tracking users’ online activity. Google says that the plug-in’s source code is open source and will be offered to third-party developers. The company says it plans to bring the service to other browsers in the future. The extension is available now and can be downloaded here.

Mozilla is also jumping on the opt-out bandwagon. The open-source championing company has announced a feature for its Firefox browser that will notify online advertisers that a user doesn’t want to be tracked. The service will use a HTTP header to transmit users’ preference to advertisers and It will then be up to companies to comply.

“We believe the header-based approach has the potential to be better for the web in the long run because it is a clearer and more universal opt-out mechanism than cookies or blacklists,” Alex Fowler, Mozilla’s technology and privacy officer, said in a blog post.”The Do Not Track header builds on the work the advertising networks have done to date without the cookie-based systems they make available to people online.”

Mozilla hasn’t yet announced when the feature will be available.  But it’s possible that it will be included in the forthcoming Firefox 4.0 release, which is currently in a beta phase.

Editors' Recommendations

Topics
Aemon Malone
Aemon Malone
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Microsoft: Internet Explorer is more energy efficient than other browsers
google to stop supporting internet explorer 6 logo

Acording to a new Microsoft-sponsored study by the Fraunhofer Center for Sustainable Energy Systems, Internet Explorer consumes less wattage than Mozilla Firefox and Google Chrome. The study discovered some pretty miniscule changes between each browser when it came to situations like "Average, Top 10 Websites" and "Fishbowl Benchmarks." However, the introduction of Flash into the test showed a fairly substantial change between browser power consumption, with Internet Explorer consuming approximately 18.6 percent less wattage than Google Chrome.
These aren't massive differences, but Microsoft is making a point of just how much of a difference a small percentage can make by releasing statements regarding the findings. According to the company, the energy saved by using Internet Explorer is enough to power 10,000 traditional homes in the United States for approximately one year. Microsoft also stated that the reduction in carbon is comparable to growing 2.2 million trees for 10 years. It isn't clear exactly why browsers consume different energy amounts, but PCWorld explains that it may be due to the "number of CPU cycles consumed over time."

Another interesting finding in the study concerns HTML5-based websites. According to the numbers posted across all three browsers, HTML5 websites caused the browsers to consume considerably more power than the basic, top ten websites that were tested. We weren't given a list of what Fraunhofer says are the Web's top ten websites, or how it decided upon what websites should be placed there. 
“Testing of two HTML5 websites (one benchmark, one video) and one Flash video found that both appear to increase power draw significantly more than the top ten websites tested," the study said. "Most notably, the HTML5 benchmark test condition more than doubled the notebook power draw for all computers and browsers tested, while desktop power draw increased by approximately 50 percent.”
The company isn't prepared to point fingers at HTML5 as a potential power consumer and it doesn't yet have enough solid evidence to suggest that it is drawing more power all on its own. It has, however, sparked interest from Fraunhofer as a potential study subject, and the company stated that "more testing was needed" to provide a suitable answer.
Photo via Fraunhofer

Read more
Firefox to start blocking third-party cookies by default, inevitably pissing off advertisers
mozilla tests enhancements for firefox to make private browsing even more firefoxhd

In the eyes of advertisers, Firefox has waged a war against them by putting a certain feature on the yet-to-be-released Firefox 22 – a feature that will make those of you who've always been concerned about online privacy happy. We're talking about a Firefox 22 setting that blocks third party cookies by default. 
Mozilla's new cookie policy means that only sites you actually visit can track your behavior and browsing activities online. Third-party cookies – usually from advertisers –  will be blocked from the get go so that advertisers will no longer be able to track most users. The option to block third-party cookies on Firefox has existed for a long time, but it will only become a default setting in Firefox 22.
Firefox is far from being the first browser to boast the feature, though: Safari for computers and iOS has been blocking third-party cookies for users for over a decade. Chrome and Internet Explorer, on the other hand, allow all cookies to go through unless you manually tweak your settings.  
It's unclear when Firefox 22 will be released since the latest Firefox, version 19, was just released last week. According to CNET, though, the 22nd version might be out as early as April 5. The new feature should not interfere with your browsing, but you need to clear your browser's cookies first for it to take effect. 
(Image credit: Lindsey B/Flickr)

Read more
Google being probed by US, EU regulators over Safari privacy gaffe
google surveillance camera

The Wall Street Journal reports U.S. and European regulators have both launched investigations into Google's bypassing of Safari privacy protections in order to put "+1" buttons on targeted advertising sent to users. As part of the effort, Google also bypassed Safari's privacy settings and installed tracking cookies on users' browsers, enabling Google to track those users' online activity and pass that information on to its DoubleClick subsidiary, one of the largest online advertising networks.
Google has said that bypassing Safari's privacy settings was accidental, and that it stopped the practice and deleted the data associated with it as soon as it became aware of the situation last month. The privacy bypass applied to both mobile and desktop versions of Safari used in Apple's iOS and Mac OS X operating systems.
Google has pledged to cooperate with investigations, but emphasized it had no intention of bypassing Safari security, and has been removing the tracking cookies.
In the United States, Google now faces multiple investigations from state and federal authorities. A group of state attorney generals have launched their own investigation into the gaffe; in theory, each state could fine Google up to $5,000 per violation. Potentially more worrying to Google is an investigation from the Federal Trade Commission: earlier this year, Google reached a settlement with the FTC regarding privacy violations associated with the launch of its now-killed Google Buzz service. Part of Google's settlement agreement is that it would not misrepresent its privacy practices, implement a comprehensive privacy program, and submit to third-party audits of its privacy practices. If Google's actions with Safari cookies are found to have violated that settlement Google could be on the hook for up to $16,000 per violation, per day. Given the hundreds of millions of iOS and Safari-running devices currently on the market, fines and penalties could represent a significant financial burden to Google.
In Europe, the French Nationale de l'Informatique et des Libertés (CNIL) has added the Safari situation to its existing investigation of Google's recent privacy police changes. CNIL is still investigating those changes, but has published an analysis that concludes Google's new privacy policy violates European data protection laws. CNIL previously fined Google in France for privacy violations surround collecting usernames and password to Wi-Fi networks when collecting data for its Street View service.
Google maintains that it used existing Safari functionality to create a temporary connection between Safari browsers and Google servers to determine if a user was signed in to a Google account and had opted to receive personalized ads and other content. However, Google says when they used that known Safari functionality, the browser also wound up accepting Google advertising cookies.

Read more