Skip to main content

House votes to restore net neutrality rules, but effort faces long odds

Save the Internet protest stock photo
Christian Wiediger/Unsplash

A step was taken toward the restoration of net neutrality regulations when the U.S. House of Representatives voted to approve the Save the Internet Act this week.

According to The Verge, the Save the Internet Act was approved on April 10, with 232 votes in favor of the measure and 190 votes against it. Also known as HR 1644, the Save the Internet Act is a bill intended “to restore the open internet order of the Federal Communications Commission [FCC].”

While the Save the Internet Act seemingly now has a chance to restore net neutrality, that chance still looks relatively slim. There is still significant opposition to the bill, which is unlikely to pass the Senate. It would need 60 votes to do so and, according to The Verge, the bill hasn’t been able to get those votes. In addition,  the White House issued a statement saying that President Donald Trump would veto the bill if it were presented to him.

Essentially, if the Save the Internet Act does become law, the measure would reinstate the net neutrality protections that were established in 2015 by the Obama administration’s Open Internet Order,which was repealed  in 2017. The Open Internet Order was intended to preserve net neutrality, which is the concept that consumers are given equal internet access and/or speed by their internet service providers (ISPs) and that their access won’t be slowed down or blocked by their ISPs if they choose to access certain kinds of online content or online services from their provider’s competitors.

Under the Save the Internet Act, net neutrality protections such as the prohibition of internet service providers blocking or throttling their customers’ internet access would be restored. The act would also, as the The Verge notes, establish the FCC as “the main authority to enforce those rules” and give the commission the authority to penalize ISPs who violate the net neutrality rules. The restoration of the FCC’s authority would be in large part due to classifying the ISPs as “common carriers” under Title II of the Communications Act. Title II common carriers are generally more closely monitored when it comes to violating regulations.

Editors' Recommendations

Anita George
Anita has been a technology reporter since 2013 and currently writes for the Computing section at Digital Trends. She began…
FCC puts a date on net neutrality’s tombstone ahead of Senate vote
ajit pai

Net neutrality finally has an official expiration date. Announced Thursday morning, May 10, the Obama-era regulations that ensured an open internet are now set to end on June 11, 2018. This will mark the first date that internet service providers in the United States will be legally allowed to obstruct or alter internet traffic according to their whims, but the fight's not over yet.

"The agency failed to listen to the American public and gave short shrift to their deeply held belief that internet openness should remain the law of the land," FCC commissioner Jessica Rosenworcel told Reuters. "The FCC is on the wrong side of history, the wrong side of the law, and the wrong side of the American people."

Read more
U.S. Senate forces a vote that could restore net neutrality
Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer Net neutrality

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., speaks during the Senate Democrats' news conference to officially file petition to force a vote on net neutrality on Wednesday, May 9, 2018. Bill Clark/Getty Images

Using its powers as outlined in the Congressional Review Act, a group of Democratic senators has submitted a "discharge petition" which could set the stage for the restoration of net neutrality in the U.S. There are still quite a few hurdles standing in the way, however.

Read more
FCC’s net neutrality rules officially end, but 18 ISPs promise to stay honest
FCC's historic decision on Net neutrality

The Federal Register showed that the Federal Communication Commission's (FCC) net neutrality rules would come to an end on April 23, and now, that has come to pass. The killing blow entered the register on Thursday, February 22, stating that the FCC returns to the "light-touch regulatory scheme" that kept America's public-accessed internet in check since the 1990s. As promised, this ruling went into effect on Monday, April 23. That means internet service providers (ISPs) no longer fall under the government-regulated "utility" umbrella. 
"The Commission restores the classification of broadband internet access service as a lightly regulated information service and reinstates the private mobile service classification of mobile broadband internet access service." 
The demise of the FCC's net neutrality rules doesn't necessarily mean ISPs will go wild and start charging outrageous fees and throttle connections on a whim. They didn't do that prior to the creation of the net neutrality rules, and likely won't resort to evil plotting once the rules expire this spring. But the FCC does have a few leashes set in place to keep internet subscribers from quivering in their boots. 
Called the Restoring Internet Freedom Order, the regulation forces ISPs like Comcast to publicly provide their commercial terms of service. They must also keep the public informed about their network management practices and their performance characteristics. The FCC believes this level of transparency will protect the "openness" of the internet versus imposing rules that are "costly" rather than beneficial. 
Yet there is still an uncertainty about what happens next. The big fear is that, with the net neutrality rules now eliminated, ISPs will start regulating internet traffic based on content and price. For instance, an ISP could provide its own video streaming service at full speed, but force Netflix to cough up extra cash if it wants customers to experience identical streaming speeds. That rise in cost would trickle down to subscribers. 
This wasn't a problem prior to the net neutrality rules, but streaming services are now more abundant, hence the fear that the services we use every day -- especially for cord cutters -- could end up costing more money now to access the same services they loved when net neutrality rules kept ISPs in check. 
Hopefully, the FCC's transparency push will help customers understand the pros and cons of what an ISP could offer. Right now, just getting the prices of the several different internet tiers provided via Charter's Spectrum service feels like pulling teeth. It's little details like price hiding that has internet surfers up in arms about any lack of regulation. 
Many ISPs such as Comcast, Charter, and 16 other companies have already pledged not to block or throttle internet connections outside the piracy envelope. In the case that throttling and/or blocking does occur, they will be required to report the root cause. ISPs must also answer to the Federal Trade Commission, and the Department of Justice. 
Though the net neutrality rules have become defunct, customers likely won't see the aftermath for a few months. Yet with government agencies keeping a watchful eye, ISPs may stay on their best behavior.
Updated on April 24: The FCC's net neutrality rules are officially no more. 

Read more