Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. Legacy Archives

ICANN, VeriSign Limit .com Price Hikes

Add as a preferred source on Google

The Internet Corporation of Assigned Numbers and Names (ICANN), the closest thing the Internet has to a governing body, and giant registration and service provider VeriSign have posted a revised edition of their settlement agreement which, in addition to resolving their dispute over VeriSign’s Site Finder service, would limit price increases which can be imposed by VeriSign on .com domain registrations and renewals.

ICANN and VeriSign reached an tentative settlement back in October 2005, mostly concerning mutual lawsuits over VeriSign’s Site Finder service, which changed the way VeriSign resolved requests for non-existent domains in the .com and .net top-level domains. The new agreement incorporates new terms in response to feedback from the Internet community, and limits the amount of money VeriSign can charge for renewals and new registrations in the .com top-level domain.

Recommended Videos

Under the revised settlement, VeriSign would be permitted to raise the fee it charges to domain name resellers for new registrations in the .com top-level domain by as much as 7 percent a year over the next six years. However, in two of those years, VeriSign would only be permitted to raise the fee in response to a security threat or as a result of new costs stemming from an ICANN mandate. Absent those causes, the fee may only be increased by 7 percent in four of the next six years.

To understand the money involved, consider that VeriSign’s fee is currently $6 per .com domain per year. Domain resellers can charge whatever they like, usually rolling that $6 into their fee. There are currently more than 40 million .com domain names registered; assuming that number remains flat, a 7 percent fee hike would net VeriSign an extra $16.8 million in registration fees in the first year alone. If VeriSign implements 7 percent increases in four of the next six years (as it would be permitted under the settlement agreement), VeriSign would pull in an $180 million over six years. If security issues or ICANN mandates require fee hikes in each of the six years, VeriSign could collect over $1.87 billion in domain fees for .com

Geoff Duncan
Former Contributor
Geoff Duncan writes, programs, edits, plays music, and delights in making software misbehave. He's probably the only member…
Deepfake bosses are crashing video calls, and researchers are trying to expose them
Seeing your boss on video no longer proves they are real
Researchers at Fraunhofer SIT are fighting against deepfake meeting video calls

Entering into a meeting with your boss and several familiar coworkers inside a video conference is the next area vulnerable to cybercrimes, and it's all because of deepfake technology. Researchers at the Fraunhofer Institute for Secure Information Technology SIT are working on a real-time warning system designed to identify attempted fraud during corporate video conferences.

The report states that criminals are increasingly targeting video meetings for identity theft and financial scams, taking advantage of the trust people place in familiar faces and voices. The intention is to flag suspicious activity while the meeting is still taking place. This gives an employee a chance to stop before following an expensive instruction from an AI-generated executive.

Read more
Apple will finally stop making iPhone-to-Windows copy-paste such a chore
Your iPhone may finally copy and paste with a Windows PC like it should
Apple Universal Clipboard feature

Copying something on an iPhone and pasting it onto a Windows PC should be one of the least remarkable features imaginable. While this simple process seems effortless between an iPhone and Mac, Windows users are still left waiting.

Now, Microsoft is formally asking Apple to provide interoperable clipboard access through the company’s European Union interoperability process. The request, submitted on March 25, argues that iOS restrictions prevent third-party platforms from creating an experience comparable to Apple’s Universal Clipboard. Apple has now reached Phase III and committed to developing a solution.

Read more
Chrome wants more extension reviews, but good ratings won’t keep malware out
Google is testing built-in extension review prompts, but good ratings can still hide malware
malicious-google-chrome-extensions-on-web-store

Google is preparing to add extension review links directly inside Chrome, putting feedback closer to the menus people already use to manage their add-ons.

A Chromium change, first spotted by Windows Report, points to review options in the Extensions menu, the chrome://extensions management page, and extension context menus. Only eligible Chrome Web Store extensions in good standing would qualify, and the feature is still under development.

Read more