Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. Legacy Archives

Intel, Asus Pair on Low-Cost Notebooks

Add as a preferred source on Google

Hand in hand with its Series 3 chipset announcements today at Taiwan’s Computex computer trade show, chipmaker Intel and motherboard manufacturer Asustek have announced plans to collaborate on a fully-fledged notebook PC aimed at education and developing markets, one of which would be priced below $200.

The new notebooks from Intel and Asustek would be full-fledged low-end notebooks with small screens and low-end processors, but “fully fledged” systems capable of running modern operating systems and mainstream software. Asustek’s Sunny Han told Reuters that the company hopes to begin shipping the machines in July or August and hopes to sell 200,000 systems during 2007.

Recommended Videos

The new systems from Intel and Asustek would compete directly with systems from the One Laptop Per Child (OLPC) initiative, which aims to begin mass production of education-centric low-end PCs shortly, at an initial cost around $180 per unit. While the OLPC systems feature a custom interface designed specifically for education purposes, are offered strictly to governments, and form ad-hoc wireless networks, the Intel/Asustek systems would be offered through traditional consumer channels and run standard software.

The new Intel/Asustek systems would also compete with Intel’s own ClassMate initiative, a low-cost education-centric PC for developing economies. Intel has shipped a little under 1,500 systems to governments in Asia and South America for testing.

The announcement highlights the market opportunity PC makers see in developing economies even as the price point for low-cost PCs continues to drop. If the products succeed, they may add fuel to the arguments nay-sayers have always had about education-centric projects like the OLPC initiative, some of whom have said market forces alone would be sufficient to offer low-cost computing and technology in developing markets.

Geoff Duncan
Former Contributor
Geoff Duncan writes, programs, edits, plays music, and delights in making software misbehave. He's probably the only member…
Moonshot tells Kimi AI to code away, but leave the hacking alone
Moonshot is clipping Kimi AI’s hacking wings before letting it loose
Moonshot AI

Chinese AI startup Moonshot AI is deliberately limiting the hacking capabilities of its latest artificial intelligence model, highlighting a growing dilemma for the industry: how do companies make AI more powerful without making cyberattacks easier to carry out?

The company introduced Kimi K3.1 Pro on October 24, describing it as a highly capable, open-weight model with around 3 trillion parameters. Unlike conventional AI services that operate entirely through a provider's servers, open-weight models allow developers to download the underlying model files, run them on their own systems, and modify how they work.

Read more
Google changes its Workspace privacy promise on ads, and opting out limits Personal Intelligence
Smarter AI answers, with a side order of ads.
AI mode in Google Search

There’s no such thing as a free recommendation. Google’s latest policy tweak is a clear reminder. Google has long promised that your Gmail, Drive, and Google Photos content never helps it personalize ads. 

However, since October 16, 2026, its privacy policy adds a catch. The promise lapses if you let other ad-showing Google services use that content. That means using Personal Intelligence, an opt-in tool that lets Google’s AI search read your connected apps, does exactly that (via Google).

Read more
OpenAI is locking its most advanced AI models offline after a string of security scares
OpenAI’s fake internet is a safety fix and an admission.
openai-anthropic-logo-on-screen

Part of me is relieved that an AI lab is hitting the brakes. The other part wishes it hadn’t taken real incidents to get there.

OpenAI said Friday that its most advanced models will now train without live internet access. Instead, they’ll practice on a cached, simulated copy of the web.

Read more