Skip to main content

Digital Trends may earn a commission when you buy through links on our site. Why trust us?

Intel’s Arc Alchemist laptops will cost a small fortune

Although there was some initial confusion regarding the launch of Intel’s Arc Alchemist GPUs at the start of April, it seems, at long last, laptops equipped with Team Blue’s latest boards will become available in the U.S. soon.

There is a caveat, though. The prices attached to these systems, which come with an entry-level Arc GPU, are raising some eyebrows.

An Intel Arc Alchemist laptop with the Arc logo displayed.
Intel

As reported by Tom’s Hardware, the first notebooks and ultrabooks that feature the A370M graphics card have been listed on Best Buy. An Asus model will cost you $1,400, while an HP laptop will require a small fortune at $2,000.

Recommended Videos

The former, Asus’ Zenbook Flip 2-in-1 device ultrabook, is powered by an Intel Core i7-12700H 12-core CPU, as well as 16GB of LPDDR5 memory. The 15.6-inch OLED touch-screen laptop also provides a 1TB SSD, while its default operating system is Windows 11 Home.

Meanwhile, HP’s Spectre is an Intel Evo-based device that sports a 12th-gen Intel Core i7-1260P processor, joined by 16GB of DDR4 RAM. Alongside the Arc Alchemist A370M graphics card (4GB GDDR6), the $2,000 machine offers a 1TB PCIe NVMe M.2 SSD as well.

Other specifications include a 16-inch diagonal, UHD+ OLED screen with multi-touch capabilities, in addition to a 360-degree hinge that allows you to use Spectre in four positions, one of which is a tablet mode (a stylus comes with the laptop). Asus also implemented a 360-degree hinge for its Zenbook.

Tom’s Hardware points out an important distinction: The aforementioned costs aren’t necessarily uncommon for thin and light Evo laptops, with 2-in-1 devices naturally commanding higher price tags due to their versatility.

Arc Alchemist’s strong competition

However, gaming laptops outfitted with the more powerful Nvidia RTX 3060 or RTX 3070 graphics cards can be purchased for similar prices. Case in point: The Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 has both an RTX 3060 mobile GPU and a Ryzen 9 5900HS processor. It’s even lighter than the Asus Zenbook and HP Spectre. The price? $1,561.

Comparatively, the first Arc laptop that was officially released in South Korea at the start of the month — an Arc A350M Samsung Galaxy Book2 Pro — launched with a $2,130 price tag.

This system was previously listed for $1,349 on a U.S. online retailer before it was taken down, albeit after customers already paid for the system (but were delivered Intel’s Iris XE GPU as opposed to an Arc Alchemist board instead).

Furthermore, Tom’s Hardware also emphasizes the fact that these $1,400 and $2,000 Arc-based systems are, at the end of the day, being powered by the entry-level A370M board. AMD put this specific GPU to the test when it compared its performance with its own entry-level RX 6500M, which found that the latter is 27% to 114% faster than the former.

Therefore, the A370M is a significantly less powerful board than mid-range versions from AMD and Nvidia such as the RX 6600M and RTX 3060.

The lacklustre technical specifications associated with the A370M GPU, coupled with extremely high prices, could prove to be a stumbling block for Intel’s plan to gain a foothold in the GPU industry.

Ultimately, it seems Intel will be pinning its hopes on the Arc Alchemist desktop series, with the company reportedly preparing seven models for that range — although you may have to wait a while before they hit store shelves.

Zak Islam
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Zak Islam was a freelance writer at Digital Trends covering the latest news in the technology world, particularly the…
AMD’s next-gen laptop GPU may rival Nvidia’s RTX 5090
Two Zephyrus G16 laptops sitting next to each other.

AMD hasn't had much of a presence lately in any of the best gaming laptops -- at least not in the graphics department. However, according to a new leak from Golden Pig Upgrade Pack on Bilibili, AMD isn't giving up on its laptop GPUs, and is in fact readying four discrete graphics cards made for laptops. The top configuration may actually rival one of Nvidia's next-gen top GPUs, but that doesn't mean it'll be equally as good.

The leaker shared a slide detailing the four laptop GPUs that AMD is said to be planning to release in its upcoming RDNA 4 lineup. Although it doesn't reveal the actual names of the graphics cards, it does show the chip names, as well as power consumption ranges and memory configurations.

Read more
Intel’s Battlemage might beat Nvidia and AMD to the punch
Intel Arc A770 GPU installed in a test bench.

Out of all the GPU news we've been getting in the last few weeks, information about Intel Arc Battlemage has been pretty scarce, Now, it appears that Intel might still surprise us. According to a new leak, Intel's next-gen desktop GPUs might join the ranks of the best graphics cards as early as next month. Launching in December would certainly give Intel an unexpected edge over AMD and Nvidia, and it's an edge that it could really use right now.

As always with these types of leaks, we're working with a vague message and reading into it to try and figure out what's going on. In this instance, the gossip comes from Golden Pig Upgrade Pack on Weibo, a user with a pretty good reputation.

Read more
Intel’s next laptop chips may have a secret weapon
Intel Core Ultra Series 2 Lunar Lake chipset.

An upcoming Intel graphics solution, namely the Intel Arc 140T, has recently been spotted on GFXBench. The most interesting bit is that it offers a noticeable performance advantage over the Xe2-based Arc 140V iGPU that recently made its appearance on Intel’s latest Lunar Lake mobile CPUs.

A post by X (formerly Twitter) user Michael (@miktdt) compares GFXbench scores of the Arc 140T with two Arc 140V SKUs—one with 16GB memory and the other with 8GB. The 8GB Arc 140V reached 6,613 frames with an average of 106.7 framers per second (fps), while the 16GB version achieved 6,839 frames at 110.3 fps. However, the Intel Arc 140T, equipped with 16GB of memory, excelled with 11,056 frames at an average of 178.3 fps, surpassing the 16GB Arc 140V by 62%, despite both GPUs sharing eight Xe cores.

Read more