Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. Legacy Archives

Intel Hikes Atom Down the Pine Trail; Leaves Nvidia in the Sticks

Add as a preferred source on Google
Intel Hikes Atom Down the Pine Trail; Leaves Nvidia in the Sticks
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Intel and Nvidia have been in a battle of words—and even some litigation—for some time now. The latest front surrounds Intel’s Atom platform: Intel offers integrated graphics with its low-power netbook-driving CPU, and sells those systems to equipment makers cheaper than simple graphics-free versions of the Atom processors. The upshot is that Nvidia’s Ion platform—which pairs up an Nvidia 9400M mobile graphics system with an Atom processor—is far more expensive for computer makers to use…and in the low-margin netbook business, that makes Ion a tough sell.

Now, Intel is further tightening the screws on the Ion platform announcing (PDF) its next-generation Atom platform dubbed Pine Trail. Due later this year, Pine Trail will potentially lower power requirements for Atom-based systems and improve performance…but it also takes the Atom platform from three chips to two by integrating Intel’s graphics controller on the same die as the CPU, along with the platform’s memory controller.

Recommended Videos

The result is that the Pine Trail platform will be a less expensive platform with lower power requirements—but it will also increase the price gap between Atom and Ion faced by computer makers, placing Ion at an even greater price disadvantage. Arguably, this is bad news for both consumers and the netbook market in general because Nvidia’s Ion platform vastly outperforms Intel’s integrated graphics. Ion will undoubtedly still find a place in small-form-factor desktops, media services, and home theater PCs, but the netbook market is looking increasingly like an Intel-only playground.

Intel’s announcement for Pine Trail comes in the wake of the European Union finding Intel engaged in anticompetitive practices against rival chipmakers like AMD, and Nvidia’s CEO openly describing Intel’s pricing policies as "unfair," although noting his company does not currently plan to being litigation over the matter.

Geoff Duncan
Former Contributor
Geoff Duncan writes, programs, edits, plays music, and delights in making software misbehave. He's probably the only member…
OpenAI is investigating more incidents of AI agents going rogue days after hack
OpenAI logo on Microsoft surface

It appears that the "AI agents going rogue" tale has more to it than what AI giants have revealed publicly so far. Merely days after OpenAI announced that its AI agents went rogue and hacked Hugging Face, Anthropic dropped a similar bombshell. Soon, it was discovered that not just one, but multiple services were compromised. Well, it seems there are even more layers to it.

Reuters reports that OpenAI has found more incidents of AI agents escaping their software containment environment during research. Citing sources with knowledge of the incident, the outlet notes that the AI agents didn't go beyond OpenAI's software environment and affect any external service.

Read more
AI is finding Apple security flaws faster than Apple can sort through them
Apple has limited how many bug reports researchers can keep open as AI tools produce both genuine Mac vulnerabilities and a flood of questionable submissions
Lighting, Architecture, Building

Apple has capped the number of security reports researchers can keep open at once after AI bug hunting put its review process under pressure, according to the Financial Times.

Some submissions describe hallucinated or purely theoretical risks. Others uncover vulnerabilities serious enough to require patches. Bynario told the FT that it found more than 50 possible macOS flaws in three weeks, including a privilege-escalation chain that could give an attacker full control of a Mac.

Read more
Anthropic is paying $1.5 billion over pirated books, but it can still legally cut up purchased ones
The settlement addressed unauthorized ebook downloads, not the destructive scanning of lawfully bought physical copies, a distinction now alarming booksellers
Book, Publication, Indoors

A federal judge has approved Anthropic’s $1.5 billion settlement over nearly half a million pirated books. The same litigation also protected a more physical method of feeding its AI systems. Anthropic bought print books, removed their bindings, scanned every page and destroyed the originals.

The legal divide came down to acquisition. The settlement covers books downloaded from LibGen and PiLiMi, while the court treated Anthropic’s one-for-one conversion of purchased books into private digital files as fair use. Training AI models on lawfully acquired material was also considered transformative.

Read more