Skip to main content

Jeb Bush’s radically transparent email dump leaves private info radically exposed

Any cyber-security adviser worth their salt will tell you not to include personal information in an email – that’s just common sense. Sending someone a message with your home address, or your medical and employment information, is a quick and easy way to have your identity stolen, and a fast track to spending an afternoon canceling your credit cards. But what about when you’re emailing a government official? Say, for example, the governor of Florida, Jeb Bush.

In an effort to promote his upcoming book (which is probably an effort to promote an upcoming national campaign), Jeb Bush previewed the first chapter, featuring email correspondence between himself and any constituent who felt like reaching out to his personal address, Jeb@jebbush.com. The conversations that appear in the book are mostly unedited, and paint a picture of the governor as a communicative, helpful, and frank politician. The problem isn’t those conversations that appear in the book, it’s all of the remaining emails, which anyone is free to browse at their own leisure, sorted conveniently by date.

Recommended Videos

Digging through the archive of hundreds of thousands of message between Jeb and his constituents, you can find a shocking wealth of unredacted personal data. The most innocuous is probably the email address of anyone who reached out to him, and it gets worse from there. Phone numbers, home and work addresses, medical information for children, some named explicitly, as presented by their parents. Personal finance and tax issues sometimes make their way into messages, with some people even including their social security numbers.

As you scroll through Jeb’s responses, you’ll occasionally stumble across a disclaimer that reads something like this: “Please note: Florida has a very broad public records law. Most written communications to or from state officials regarding state business are public records available to the public and media upon request. Your e-mail communications may therefore be subject to public disclosure.”

It reads a lot like those email disclaimers people often include in their own signatures, warning recipients not to share the contents of an email. In reality, these statements have never been taken into consideration in any sort of legal proceeding — they’re pretty much useless, save for easing the nervousness of the sender. Bush’s disclaimer serves as a reminder of Florida’s Sunshine laws, which grant the public access to just about everything happening behind the scenes in government. Transparency has been an important part of Florida law since 1909, with the definition of “public” being considered carefully, and often. In fact, it’s the whole reason that there isn’t any legal recourse for citizens whose personal information has been shared — their correspondence with the governor is considered public record.

Jeb Bush is acutely familiar with Sunshine laws, as well as their importance to the press and citizens of Florida. Immediately after taking office he scheduled a brief meeting with the Democratic and Republican state congressional leaders, to which he didn’t invite any members of the press. They immediately insinuated he was hiding something, and in an email with a former gubernatorial employee, he responds “I wonder if this email is a matter of public record??????????????????” Ironically enough, the email found its way into the very first chapter of his book.

Bush team has been quick to respond to complaints by redacting information and removing messages entirely when needed. He also accepted the resignation of his chief technical officer, Ethan Czahor, who caused controversy a number of times in the last few years by tweeting racist and misogynist sentiments. Maybe most importantly of all, they pulled the download links for the sortable databases of the emails. But on the Internet, it’s a lot easier to let the cat out of the bag than it is to get it back in.

Brad Bourque
Brad Bourque is a native Portlander, devout nerd, and craft beer enthusiast. He studied creative writing at Willamette…
Google’s AI agent ‘Big Sleep’ just stopped a cyberattack before it started
Sundar Pichai

Google's AI agent, dubbed Big Sleep, has achieved a cybersecurity milestone by detecting and blocking an imminent exploit in the wild—marking the first time an AI has proactively foiled a cyber threat. Developed by Google DeepMind and Project Zero, Big Sleep identified a critical vulnerability in SQLite (CVE-2025-6965), an open-source database engine, that was on the verge of being exploited by malicious actors, allowing Google to patch it before damage occurred. “We believe this is the first time an AI agent has been used to directly foil efforts to exploit a vulnerability in the wild,” the company said.

Why it matters: As cyberattacks surge—costing businesses trillions annually—this breakthrough shifts defense from reactive patching to AI-driven prediction and prevention. It gives security teams a powerful new tool to stay ahead of hackers, potentially saving devices and data worldwide. CEO Sundar Pichai called it "a first for an AI agent—definitely not the last" according to Live Mint.

Read more
Google confirms merging Chrome OS and Android into one platform
Google Chrome app on s8 screen.

Why it matters: Google's push to blend Chrome OS and Android could supercharge affordable laptops like Chromebooks, making them more versatile for work and play. This move echoes Apple's seamless ecosystem across iPadOS and macOS, potentially shaking up the PC market where Windows dominates but innovation lags.

What's happening: In a bombshell interview, Google's Android ecosystem president Sameer Samat outright confirmed the company is "combining Chrome OS and Android into a single platform. This follows months of rumors and aligns with Android 16's new desktop-friendly features, like proper windowing and external display support. But then Samat later clarified on X that it's not a full-on merger killing Chrome OS; instead, it's about weaving Android's tech stack deeper into Chrome for better app compatibility and hardware efficiency.

Read more
WeTransfer backlash highlights need for smarter AI practices
A pair of hands using a keyboard on a laptop.

A recent update to WeTransfer’s terms of service caused consternation after some of its customers feared that it meant content from files uploaded to the popular file-sharing service would automatically be used to train AI models.

But the Netherlands-based company insisted on Tuesday that this is not the case, saying in a statement that it "does not sell user content to third parties,” and nor does it "use AI in connection with customer content.”

Read more