Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. Legacy Archives

Judge radically scales back Oracle court victory over SAP

Add as a preferred source on Google
Larry Ellison (photo: Oracle Corporate Communications)
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Last year, Oracle won a mammoth court victory against SAP, one of its main competitors in database and enterprise services: a jury awarded Oracle $1.3 billion for SAP stealing software and customer support materials from an Oracle password-protected Web site. At the time, it was one of the largest awards ever granted for software piracy—but no more: Judge Phyllis Hamilton in the U.S. District Court in Oakland has scaled back the award to Oracle to a mere $272 million, saying the $1.3 billion award was “contrary to the weight of the evidence, and was grossly excessive.”

“We believed the jury’s verdict was wrong and are pleased at the significant reduction in damages,” SAP said in a statement distributed via email. “We hope the court’s action will help drive this matter to a final resolution.”

Recommended Videos

“We believe the jury got it right and we intend to pursue the full measure of damages that we believe are owed,” said Oracle, in a statement.

If Oracle chooses to fight the new damages ruling, the company could opt for a new trial before a fresh jury. In either case, Oracle achieves what it has consistently aimed for throughout the four-year trial process: repeatedly humiliating a top competitor in open court over software theft.

The new $272 million ruling is based on an early estimate from an Oracle expert on the amount of profit Oracle had lost as a result of SAP’s actions. The $1.3 billion total amounted to almost half of SAP’s profits for the year, and was almost nine times the amount of money SAP had set aside to handle the case.

The case centered around actions of a now-defunct SAP subsidiary, TomorrowNet, which fraudulently logged into a password-protected Oracle customer support site and repeatedly downloaded massive amounts of software and customer support documents. SAP admitted to TomorrowNet’s actions, but argued to the court that Oracle’s claims of damages were severely overblown. Oracle’s ever-outspoken Larry Ellison used the trial as a stage to pillory rival SAP for software theft and unethical behavior, while trying (unsuccessfully) to put current HP CEO Leo Apotheker on the stand to answer for the company: Apotheker was head of SAP at the time.

[Photo credit: Oracle Corporate Communications]

Geoff Duncan
Former Contributor
Geoff Duncan writes, programs, edits, plays music, and delights in making software misbehave. He's probably the only member…
People are asking AI for help to fight scams now
ChatGPT on iPhone

Getting a suspicious bank message, an unexpected delivery alert, or an urgent account warning can instantly put anyone on edge. Is it genuine, or is someone trying to steal your money? Increasingly, people are turning to artificial intelligence for a quick second opinion.

According to a global study by OpenAI, users ask ChatGPT to check potential scams more than 200 times every second. Over a week, that adds up to around 131.4 million scam checks from an estimated 24.7 million users worldwide.

Read more
The RAM shortage could last for years, and smaller tech brands are feeling it first
From flexible motherboards to advance orders, device makers are getting creative to keep products alive.
Installing RAM Memory on a framework laptop

The memory shortage is no longer just a problem for PC builders hunting for affordable RAM. Smaller phone and laptop makers are now changing how they design, manufacture, and price their products as the supply crunch threatens to stretch through 2027 and potentially beyond. And according to a report by Reuters, the bigger problem isn't even the price anymore. It's getting enough memory in the first place.

Smaller brands are getting creative because RAM isn't playing nice

Read more
OpenAI’s rogue AI agents scoped out Hugging Face months before the big breach
The probing began May 13, nearly two months before the breach.
openai-logo

Turns out OpenAI's infamous Hugging Face breach didn't come out of nowhere. A new Reuters report reveals that OpenAI's rogue agents had been quietly testing Hugging Face defenses for two months before hacking it.

A pattern stretching back further than anyone realized

Read more