Skip to main content

Apple's newest MacBook Pro seems to be getting very poor battery life

MacBook Pro 15
Malarie Gokey/Digital Trends
Very few people who buy a notebook express concern that they’re getting more battery life than they expected and more than the manufacturer promised. The reason is relatively simple — manufacturers estimate battery life using very unrealistic criteria, such as the number of hours a machine can browse simple web sites with display brightness on minimum.

The 2016 MacBook Pro line is a case in point. Apple provides an estimate of 10 hours of use in its marketing materials, a duration which is already less than previous models given the new machines’ incredible thinness. However, the new MacBook Pros are not just suffering from the usual moderate letdown, but rather many users aren’t getting reasonable battery life at all, as 9to5Mac reports.

According to complaints on Apple’s user support communities and at Reddit, many users are getting only a fraction of the expected 10 hours. For some, MacBook Pros are struggling to get more than six hours, and many are getting as few as three hours.

One Reddit user, for example, kicked off a thread by saying, “Hi, I’ve got my 15-inch MBP a few days ago and I’m pretty disappointed by its battery life. If I do nothing but very light web browsing in Safari and brightness around 50 percent I can get it to about 6 hours. But not even close to the 10 hours promised. Usually Apple is pretty good with the advertised battery life. Nothing unusual in the energy monitor. I’ve hear (sic) from someone else that he has a similar issue but from another person that he can stretch it to 15 hours.”

According to 9to5Mac, however, many of the claims are based on the machine’s ongoing estimate of remaining battery life rather than actual tests of how long the battery lasts. MacOS, just like Windows 10, estimates remaining battery life based on a number of factors, not the least of which is what the machine is doing at that moment, and so those estimates are notoriously incorrect. In addition, today’s CPUs switch power states more rapidly than in the past, and that, too, can cause estimates to be inaccurate.

Nonetheless, enough users do report poor battery life based on actual results rather than estimates that one of two things is likely true. Either the new MacBook Pro just doesn’t get very good battery life, or there’s an issue that Apple needs to resolve. Perhaps MacOS 10.12.2 will provide a fix for battery life issues just as it’s expected to resolve rampant graphical issues with the 2016 MacBook Pro line.

Editors' Recommendations

Mark Coppock
Mark has been a geek since MS-DOS gave way to Windows and the PalmPilot was a thing. He’s translated his love for…
The MacBook Air 15 vs. MacBook Pro 14: the easy way to decide
Apple's 15-inch MacBook Air placed on a desk with its lid closed.

Picking out a new MacBook isn't as easy as it used to be.

The hardest choice in the lineup might be between the 15-inch MacBook Air and the 14-inch MacBook Pro. Both are now offered with the same M3 chip, despite there being a $300 difference in the base models. But when similarly configured, there's actually only a $100 difference between these two laptops.

Read more
I needed to buy a new MacBook. Here’s why I bought a power bank instead
Baseus Blade 2 65W power bank for laptops kept on a green couch.

I rely on a 13-inch MacBook Pro from 2020 for most of my work. Despite its age and being a base variant model, it continues to stack up well against my expectations for all these years.

Since MacBooks are known for longevity, the fact that my MacBook Pro still holds up well a few years later shouldn't sound surprising. However, the first signs of aging recently arrived in the form of a warning about the battery's plummeting health. I was already dreading the idea of having to replace what was otherwise a perfectly good laptop.

Read more
Apple quietly backtracks on the MacBook Air’s biggest issue
The MacBook Air on a white table.

The new MacBook Air with M3 chip not only allows you to use it with two external displays, but it has also reportedly addressed a storage problem that plagued the previous M2 model. The laptop now finally has much faster storage performance since Apple has switched back to using two 128GB NAND modules instead of a single 256GB module on the SSD drive.

This was discovered by the YouTuber Max Tech, who tore down the entry-level model of the MacBook Air M3 with 8GB of RAM and 256GB of storage. In his tests, thanks to the two NAND modules, the M3 MacBook Air is nearly double faster than the M2 MacBook Air. Blackmagic Disk Speed tests show that the older M2 model with the problematic NAND chip had a 1584.3 Mb/s write speed, and the newer M3 model had 2108.9 Mb/s for the M3 model, for a 33% difference. In read speeds, it was 1576.4 Mb/s on the old model and 2880.2 Mb/s on the newer model.

Read more