Skip to main content

Nokia amps up patent battle with Apple

Apple iPhone 4
Image used with permission by copyright holder

The patent feud between technology giants Apple and Nokia continues to escalate, with Nokia announcing today that it has filed new patent infringement claims against Apple in Germany, the Netherlands, and the United Kingdom. Further, Nokia is expanding the list of patents it claims Apple is infringing upon, adding another 13 patents to the previous 24 already cited in infringement claims filed in the United States and with the U.S. International Trade Commission.

“The Nokia inventions protected by these patents include several which enable compelling user experiences,” said Nokia’s VP for intellectual property Paul Melin, in a statement. “For example, using a wiping gesture on a touch screen to navigate content, or enabling access to constantly changing services with an on-device app store, both filed more than ten years before the launch of the iPhone.”

Recommended Videos

Nokia’s new UK filing covers four patents, while the case in the Netherlands covers two. Nokia has filed two infringement cases against Apple in Germany: on in Mannheim covering five patents, and another in Dusseldorf covering seven.

Apple has had no comment on the new suits.

Nokia filed its first infringement claims against Apple over a year ago in the United States. Since then the companies have engaged in a tit-for-tat game of one-upsmanship: Apple quickly countersued against Nokia’s initial claims; Nokia extended its suits to pull in more technology in the iPhone and iPad, and Apple extended its counter-litigation to the United Kingdom. Patent battles often take a notoriously long time to resolve, and its often in companies’ interest to continue raising the stakes in hopes an opponent will give in to a settlement rather than take a chance on a court battle. Nokia won an early round of proceedings—the U.S. International Trade Commission found that Apple hadn’t established Nokia was infringing on its patents strongly enough to justify an import injunction—but, sadly, the fight is still in its early stages.

The mobile world is involved in a rash of high-stakes litigation as companies jockey for favorable positions: Apple is also suing HTC in a fight that’s largely seeing as being about Google’s Android operating system (HTC countersued); Apple and Motorola are also suing (and countersuing) each other, and Microsoft and Motorola are also in a back and forth tussle. Sometimes things work out, however: last June, RIM and Motorola settled a patent dispute without going to court—although RIM wound up paying Motorola an undisclosed amount.

Geoff Duncan
Former Contributor
Geoff Duncan writes, programs, edits, plays music, and delights in making software misbehave. He's probably the only member…
iPad is the best secondary screen I’ve used with a MacBook
You can extend your MacBook's screen by using an iPad as a secondary monitor.

I spend an unhealthy amount of time lurking in communities where people share aesthetic desktop setups. One of my friends recently set the group chat on fire with a triple monitor setup that had two vertical screens and an ultrawide curved panel at the center. An impulse swipe later, I achieved a similar makeover for my desk at home.

Here’s the problem, though. My $600 workstation overhaul did bring me visual joy, but not much utility. For reporting assignments, I spend the majority of the year away from home, working from deserted cafes or unnaturally uncomfortable bunk beds. I do miss the convenience of large secondary screens. Interestingly, that yearning is addressed by a rather unconventional device —the humble iPad. 

Read more
I love Apple’s minimalist Mac design, and the iPhone 17 Air needs to follow it
Apple Mac Studio 2025 top down view showing desktop.

It’s no secret that Apple’s products are among the best designed devices in the tech industry. Just one peek at the MacBook Pro or the iPhone 16 Pro and you know that you’re looking at quality.

There’s a reason for that, and it’s got nothing to do with blind luck. No, Apple’s design philosophy has long been to strip away the unnecessary elements of a device until you’re left with only the essential components. There should be nothing extraneous, no needless fluff. Instead, the product should be the core expression of a concept, such as a phone or a computer. That has led to some of its best designs.

Read more
Here’s how Apple’s first foldable MacBook might win me over
The Zenbook Fold 17 open on a table.

Rumors have persisted for years now that Apple is working on a touchscreen MacBook, but I’ve never been truly convinced. For one thing, I don’t see how a touchscreen could improve my MacBook experience enough to justify the inevitable price rise. This is Apple we’re talking about, after all, and there’s just no way that a touchscreen MacBook will possibly come cheap.

As well as that, I’ve long agreed with Steve Jobs’ belief that adding a touchscreen to a regular MacBook is an ergonomic nightmare. Constantly reaching up to the display is a quick way to exhaust your arms, and paining its users isn’t really part of Apple’s playbook. The Mac operating system isn’t designed for touch either, and in any case, adding a touchscreen would result in all manner of greasy fingerprints on your monitor. It’s never seemed like a good idea to me.

Read more