Skip to main content

Nvidia is asking the Biden administration to lower the price of GPUs

Nvidia and other computing companies are calling on the Biden administration to lower the cost of graphics cards. In several comments sent to the office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR), the companies called for an exclusion from the tariffs that could increase graphics card prices by as much as 25%.

In October, the USTR opened comments on the extension of exclusions that came as part of the Trump administration’s tariffs on goods imported from China. In 2020, the Trump administration extended tariffs to semiconductors and printed circuit boards (in this case, graphics cards), fueling the flames of an ongoing trade war with China. These tariffs, at least in part, have been cited as a source of the ongoing GPU shortage.

NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang on stage.
Nvidia

Graphics cards were given an exclusion on the tariffs, but it expired at the end of 2020. “We support reinstating the exclusion,” a lawyer representing Nvidia said in its comment. “Efforts to create new capacity in countries that presently do not manufacture such products (such as the U.S. and Vietnam) were unsuccessful and were severely hampered by the fallout from COVID-19.”

HP joined Nvidia with a comment of its own, saying that “HP strongly supports reinstatement of the exclusion.” Graphics card maker Zotac joined in as well, citing how difficult it is to “source for a right manufacturer to produce products in the United States and/or in third countries beside China.”

Tariffs are a tax on goods imported from another country, but the country exporting those goods isn’t responsible for paying. The importer — someone in the U.S., in this case — is on the hook for the extra cost, which is usually passed down to consumers. Tariffs are meant to deisincentivize purchasing imported products by making them more expensive than domestic products.

That’s the problem, though: The U.S. doesn’t produce any graphics cards. As Nvidia, Zotac, and HP all point out, the supply chain for graphics cards is almost entirely focused in China and Taiwan. In the case of graphics cards, the tariff doesn’t punish China or Chinese manufacturing. It just makes graphics cards more expensive without a domestic alternative.

It will be several years before the U.S. sees a domestically produced graphics card, if at all. Intel, the current champion of domestic semiconductor manufacturing, is still outsourcing its upcoming Arc Alchemist graphics cards to Taiwan-based chipmaker TSMC. AMD and Nvidia also partner with TSMC for manufacturing, as does Apple.

There’s a good chance that the USTR will extend an exclusion to graphics cards, which should drive down prices. The USTR says that exclusions will be doled out to products based on availability in the U.S., domestic capacity for production, and changes in the supply chain since September 2018. Graphics cards hit all three requirements.

Editors' Recommendations

Jacob Roach
Senior Staff Writer, Computing
Jacob Roach is a writer covering computing and gaming at Digital Trends. After realizing Crysis wouldn't run on a laptop, he…
Starfield bet on FSR, and now Nvidia players are paying the price
An astronaut explores a planet's surface in Starfield.

Starfield is a great change of pace for PC releases in 2023. The game is very stable, relatively bug free, and it's optimized to run on a wide range of hardware. That doesn't mean the game isn't demanding. It is very demanding, and it's clear Starfield leans on AMD's FidelityFX Super Resolution 2 (FSR 2) to push frame rates higher.

As I was gathering my best settings for Starfield on PC, it became clear that the game is designed around having FSR 2 turned on. That's not inherently a problem. For a game as demanding and visually impressive as Starfield, though, leaning too heavily on a singular feature can make some players, especially those on less powerful hardware, choose between performance and image quality. And in the case of Starfield, that's not a decision they should need to make.
The reality of the situation
AMD is Starfield’s Exclusive PC Partner

Read more
Where in the world are all of AMD’s next-gen laptop GPUs?
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2023 front view showing display and keyboard deck.

I honestly forgot AMD released next-gen RDNA 3 laptop graphics cards, and I wouldn't be surprised if you did too. At the beginning of this year, the company announced a slate of next-gen graphics cards for laptops, promising they'd be out by February. The laptops -- and trust me, there are only a few -- came and went, the seasons changed, and nothing. We've had no more AMD laptops since.

I won't pretend AMD has a strong hand in the best gaming laptops. It's a place Nvidia has dominated and will likely continue to do so for generations to come, but the offerings for mobile AMD GPUs are in very short order this year. And that's especially disappointing considering the performance AMD originally claimed when it announced its RDNA 3 laptop graphics cards.

Read more
AMD isn’t just copying Nvidia’s homework with FSR 3
Frank Azor presenting AMD's FSR 3 at Gamescom.

After nearly a year of waiting, AMD has finally shared more details on its upcoming FidelityFX Super Resolution 3 (FSR 3). If you've seen the original announcement you know what to expect -- it's AMD's FSR upscaling combined with something called Fluid Motion Frames to multiply frame rates. The big news? It works with any GPU.

Well, not technically any GPU. AMD says its Fluid Motion Frames works on anything from the original RDNA generation (RX 5000) and newer, but that includes GPUs from Nvidia and Intel. It's a much different approach than Nvidia's Deep Learning Super Sampling 3 (DLSS 3). The DLSS Frame Generation feature not only requires an Nvidia RTX GPU, but specifically one from the most recent generation like the RTX 4070.

Read more