After 16 years, OpenOffice contemplates retirement

By Jaina Grey Published February 2, 2022

Looks like OpenOffice might be near the end of the road, according to an email thread started yesterday by the project’s vice president Dennis Hamilton.

The email thread, titled “What would OpenOffice retirement involve?” comes after years of developer attrition. Open source developers have been abandoning OpenOffice in favor of the more popular LibreOffice for a couple years now and it shows. OpenOffice hasn’t been updated since October 2015, and project leaders are getting worried about what that might mean for user security.

Recommended Videos

Ars Technica reports OpenOffice issued a security advisory earlier this year, detailing a potential vulnerability in OpenOffice which has no apparent fix – besides switching to LibreOffice or Microsoft Office.

“Needing to disclose security vulnerabilities for which there is no mitigation in an update has become a serious issue,” Hamilton wrote.

.

Hamilton’s security concerns were followed by a lengthy discussion of what would need to happen for OpenOffice to shut down for good – where to archive the code, and how to box things up before shutting off the lights.

Despite the popularity of LibreOffice, OpenOffice still enjoys considerable support among open source developers, and they’re not happy about all this talk about retirement.

For instance, developers Phillip Rhodes and Roberto Galoppini referred to the email thread as a mistake. They worry that even a discussion of retirement could become a self-fulfilling prophecy, a fear Hamilton echoed in his initial email.

“I cannot prediction [sic] how this will all work out. It is remiss of me not to point out that retirement of the project is a serious possibility,” Hamilton continued.

OpenOffice has suffered ever since the release of the more-frequently updated LibreOffice, which has become the default office suit available in a number of Linux distributions. Originally started as an offshoot of OpenOffice, LibreOffice doesn’t enjoy the name recognition, but by comparison it saw 14 updates in 2015, when OpenOffice only saw one.

Open source projects often live or die by their popularity among independent developers willing to work on the projects, and in that regard it certainly seems like OpenOffice could be on its way out.

Optimistic developers who still support OpenOffice claim that a discussion of retirement isn’t productive, claiming instead that they should be focused on attracting new users and new developers.

Either way, it looks like the OpenOffice team has a tough choice ahead of them.

Former Digital Trends Contributor

Jaina Grey is a Seattle-based journalist with over a decade of experience covering technology, coffee, gaming, and AI. Her…

Topics

Computing

DigUp lets users find Mac files by describing them, not remembering their names

Can't remember where that screenshot, PDF or recording went? Just describe it and let AI do the digging.

DigUp App in Use screenshot

There's a particular kind of frustration that comes with knowing a file exists somewhere on a computer but having absolutely no idea what it's called. Was that screenshot saved as IMG_4837? Which PDF contained that clause? And where did that podcast recording mention the thing worth remembering? DigUp wants to end the filename guessing game, letting Mac users search for files by describing what they remember instead. The free, open-source app uses Google's EmbeddingGemma 2 to search across photos, documents, PDFs, audio recordings and videos, all without sending personal files to the cloud.

DigUp turns everyday descriptions into file searches

Computing

A new AI detector looks beyond words to check whether the ideas came from AI

This could help journals distinguish AI-written research from human work polished with AI.

ai-writing-book

Most AI detectors look for telltale signs of AI-generated text by examining word and sentence patterns. A new tool called IdeaLens takes a different route to solving this problem. It spots AI-generated research by looking at the ideas behind it instead of the wording itself (via TechXplore).

Researchers from the University of Maryland, Google DeepMind, and Simon Fraser University built IdeaLens to check whether a document's core arguments came from a human or a machine, regardless of who wrote the final draft.

Computing

Anthropic warns of imminent self-replicating AI that might even work off an oven or TV

Self-replicating AI could be merely months away, and tests show it can run on the devices sitting at your home.

Illustration of dangerous AI.

Over the past few weeks, nearly every AI lab has released frontier AI models. Earlier today, Google started rolling out Gemini 4, Argon, hot on the heels of Meta announcing its Muse Wonder frontier AI models to compete against the best from OpenAI and Anthropic's Claude. This relentless pace of AI model release comes at a time when the same AI labs are calling for development slowdown and increased regulation, following a series of concerning incidents where these AI models went rogue and broke into private, as well as government-owned, websites.

Now, Anthropic has dropped a chilling set of predictions about the capabilities of these AI models after running a series of tests. The company claims that small AI models could be merely a few months away from self-replicating and turning into a dangerous swarm. More importantly, they won't require a massive data center or an uber-powerful computer to do so. On the contrary, the lab claims that these self-replicating AI swarms will need something with as little computing power as an average Internet-connected device, like a smart oven or an Android TV box.