Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. News

Researchers have built a tool that can identify the AI used to make a fake video

Every AI video generator leaves behind subtle, distinct patterns, and this new tool learned to read them.

Add as a preferred source on Google
fake-ai-video
Ron Lach / Pexels

AI-generated videos have gotten so realistic that spotting a fake is difficult enough on its own. Figuring out which AI model actually created it is even harder. That’s exactly why researchers at UC Riverside built a tool that can do both. It’s called SAGA, and it can trace a fake video back to the specific AI model that generated it.

The project was led by UC Riverside doctoral researcher Rohit Kundu and electrical and computer engineering professor Amit K. Roy-Chowdhury, in collaboration with researchers from YouTube and Google DeepMind.

How does SAGA figure out where a fake video came from?

SAGA (Source Attribution of Generative AI Videos) looks for subtle visual patterns left behind unintentionally by AI video generators. The tool compares these patterns to fingerprints and distinct traces that differ from one AI system to another.

Recommended Videos

Unlike still images, videos carry motion and timing information, meaning visual elements shift from frame to frame. Different AI generators produce their own subtle quirks in those shifts. SAGA studies both individual frames and how visuals evolve across an entire sequence, using a technique called Temporal Attention Signatures to build a distinct profile for each AI system based on patterns averaged across many of its videos.

The team tested SAGA against 19 different AI video generators, covering both text-to-video and image-to-video systems. It can confirm whether a video is real or fake, identify whether it originated from text or an image, and even point to the specific development team behind it.

How can this tool help?

As AI-generated videos become more realistic, simply labeling content as fake is no longer enough. Knowing its source could help investigators trace misinformation campaigns, assist regulators with transparency rules, and give technology companies better insight into how fake content spreads online.

The researchers acknowledge that identifying AI-generated content will remain a constant race between creators and detectors. Still, they believe tools like SAGA can make it much harder for malicious actors to hide the origins of fake videos as generative AI continues to evolve.

Manisha Priyadarshini
Manisha Priyadarshini is a tech and entertainment writer with over nine years of editorial experience.
Gemini Notebook’s latest update makes it a better study companion
Google is adding voice conversations, lecture recording, interactive quizzes, and short video overviews to its AI-powered notebook.
Gemini Notebook update for students

Google is giving Gemini Notebook, formerly NotebookLM, a major upgrade for students, adding new features designed to help them understand difficult concepts, capture lectures, and turn study materials into interactive learning tools. The update lands alongside a free year of Google's paid AI plan for eligible college students.

Gemini Notebook can now talk you through your notes

Read more
LG 39GX950B review: An ultrawide OLED that gets remarkably close to having it all
LG’s 39-inch 5K2K OLED combines high-end picture quality with seriously fast gaming
Electronics, Screen, Computer Hardware

see at bestbuy

Quick Verdict

Read more
Should we feel bad about deleting an AI? One expert says it’s time to find out
If AI can learn, remember, and make increasingly complex decisions, one expert thinks we should be more careful about how we say goodbye.
an on off toggle

Turning off an AI might sound as simple as hitting a switch, but according to futurist and University of Technology Sydney professor Rocky Scopelliti, that mindset needs to change fast. As first reported by TechXplore, Scopelliti's new book, The Conscious Code, Scopelliti argues that as AI systems get better at reflecting on their own choices, deleting them without a second thought could actually cause harm.

He's not asking us to hand robots legal rights. Instead, he wants us to accept what he calls a duty of good stewardship, basically treating AI responsibly because we're the ones holding the power, not because the AI is demanding it. As he puts it, our design choices can quietly cause damage by wiping out an AI's "learned moral dispositions" without warning.

Read more