Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. Legacy Archives

Spyware Vendor to Pay $1 Mln in Settlement

Add as a preferred source on Google

Computer software maker Secure Computer of White Plains, New York, which was accused of marketing its Spyware Cleaner product via deceptive spam and pop-up scans, has agreed to settle with the Washington State attorney general for $750,000 in legal fees, $2000 in damages, and $75,000 in reimbursements to Washington State customers who purchased Spyware Cleaner.

The company was accused of violating Washington State’s 2005 Computer Spyware Act by marketing its product via deceptive spam and pop-up advertisements. The ads would offer to perform free spyware scans on a user’s computer, but would always report a problem with the scanned computer and offer Spyware Cleaner as a solution.

Recommended Videos

According to the attorney general’s office, more than 1,100 Washington State residents purchased Spyware Cleaner since it was introduced in 2004; under the terms of the settlement, Secure Computer will contact each buyer and offer a $50 refund on the product.

The settlement does not include an admission of guilt or wrongdoing, but authorities are upbeat that the settlement sends an important message to online fraudsters. “This settlement with Secure Computer is a significant victory for the Attorney General’s Consumer Protection High-Tech Unit, Washington consumers and the online marketplace,” said Washington Attorney General Rob McKenna. “It sends a strong message to Internet businesses that they must promote their products ethically and legally. We won’t tolerate deceptive marketing such as ‘scareware’ that preys on consumers’ fears about spyware and online threats.”

Secure Computer killed Spyware Cleaner as soon as the lawsuits hit, and Secure Computer itself is now out of business; nonetheless, the settlement forbids it from using deceptive marketing techniques in the future, and to monitor the marketing efforts of its affiliates to make sure they comply with the settlement.

Secure Computer was sued by Microsoft at the same time Washington State filed its case; the Microsoft suit was reportedly settled in September, 2006.

Geoff Duncan
Former Contributor
Geoff Duncan writes, programs, edits, plays music, and delights in making software misbehave. He's probably the only member…
Passkeys were pushed as a safer future. Hackers have figured out ways to break those synced to Google
Google’s “uncopyable” passkeys may be easier to steal than promised
google-lawsuite-AI-Scams

Passkeys have been pushed as the safer successor to passwords. It promised protection from phishing, credential reuse, and password leaks. Google even claims that it cannot be copied or accidentally handed to someone else. But it might not be as secure as the company wants it to be.

Security researchers (Via BleepingComputer) have now found three ways malware can undermine those promises for passkeys synced through Google Password Manager. The techniques, collectively named Pass-ta-key, target Google Password Manager inside Chrome on Windows computers equipped with a Trusted Platform Module. Every attack requires malware to already be running on the victim’s computer.

Read more
Apple’s OpenAI lawsuit just tripped over an embarrassing wrong-recipient email
Apple came for OpenAI’s trade secrets, but OpenAI had email receipts
OpenAI

Apple and OpenAI’s legal battle has quickly moved beyond carefully worded court statements. OpenAI has just shared the email and message trails behind the dispute, and one exchange leaves Apple’s version of events looking questionable.

In a bluntly titled post, “Apple is getting this wrong,” OpenAI challenged Apple’s request for a preliminary injunction and accused the iPhone maker of building parts of its case around false or incomplete information. Apple wants a court to prevent OpenAI and two former Apple employees from accessing, acquiring, using, or disclosing its alleged confidential information.

Read more
Google Drive steps up its video collaboration game with timestamped comments
Google Drive's timestamped comments pin feedback to exact moments in videos.
Google Drive featured image.

Over the years, I’ve collaborated with many video editors and content creator friends of mine, often pointing out things like how the text isn’t visible around the two-minute mark or how the transition in the opening sequence feels a little off. 

However, most of the time, they would end up scrubbing through the whole clip trying to find what I meant, or they'd ask me to send a screenshot of the exact moment I was referring to. Considering I wasn’t charging anything to spot those issues, that extra effort always stung a little. Thankfully, Google’s latest Workspace update finally fixes that.

Read more