Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. Legacy Archives

Supreme Court Upholds Virginia Antispam Law as Unconstitutional

Add as a preferred source on Google
Supreme Court Upholds Virginia Antispam Law as Unconstitutional
Image used with permission by copyright holder

The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday announced it was refusing to consider re-instating a tough Virginia antispam law, effectively leaving stand a lower court’s decision that the law was overly broad and restricted speech protected under the First Amendment. The decision ends the long legal road of the 2003 law, which made it a felony to send anonymously more than 10,000 unsolicited bulk email messages in a 24-hour period. The law was also used to sentence notorious AOL spammer Jeremy James to nine years in a federal prison back in 2005—Jaynes was the first felony conviction for spamming in the United States.

The Supreme Court did not give a reason for declining to hear the case, but apparently it is comfortable with the Virginia Supreme Court’s 2008 ruling that the law violated First Amendment protections. Virginia attorney general Bill Mims has pledged to draft new antispam legislation to help protect his states’ citizens against online scammers and floods of spam messages.

Recommended Videos

Jaynes is said to have pulled in more than $24 million by sending over 10 million spam messages a day; the decision to leave the lower court ruling untouched means Jaynes’ nine-year sentence gets thrown away, although he is currently serving a 42-month sentence in prison on an unrelated fraud conviction.

Geoff Duncan
Former Contributor
Geoff Duncan writes, programs, edits, plays music, and delights in making software misbehave. He's probably the only member…
OpenAI is investigating more incidents of AI agents going rogue days after hack
OpenAI logo on Microsoft surface

It appears that the "AI agents going rogue" tale has more to it than what AI giants have revealed publicly so far. Merely days after OpenAI announced that its AI agents went rogue and hacked Hugging Face, Anthropic dropped a similar bombshell. Soon, it was discovered that not just one, but multiple services were compromised. Well, it seems there are even more layers to it.

Reuters reports that OpenAI has found more incidents of AI agents escaping their software containment environment during research. Citing sources with knowledge of the incident, the outlet notes that the AI agents didn't go beyond OpenAI's software environment and affect any external service.

Read more
AI is finding Apple security flaws faster than Apple can sort through them
Apple has limited how many bug reports researchers can keep open as AI tools produce both genuine Mac vulnerabilities and a flood of questionable submissions
Lighting, Architecture, Building

Apple has capped the number of security reports researchers can keep open at once after AI bug hunting put its review process under pressure, according to the Financial Times.

Some submissions describe hallucinated or purely theoretical risks. Others uncover vulnerabilities serious enough to require patches. Bynario told the FT that it found more than 50 possible macOS flaws in three weeks, including a privilege-escalation chain that could give an attacker full control of a Mac.

Read more
Anthropic is paying $1.5 billion over pirated books, but it can still legally cut up purchased ones
The settlement addressed unauthorized ebook downloads, not the destructive scanning of lawfully bought physical copies, a distinction now alarming booksellers
Book, Publication, Indoors

A federal judge has approved Anthropic’s $1.5 billion settlement over nearly half a million pirated books. The same litigation also protected a more physical method of feeding its AI systems. Anthropic bought print books, removed their bindings, scanned every page and destroyed the originals.

The legal divide came down to acquisition. The settlement covers books downloaded from LibGen and PiLiMi, while the court treated Anthropic’s one-for-one conversion of purchased books into private digital files as fair use. Training AI models on lawfully acquired material was also considered transformative.

Read more