Skip to main content

Twitter Says No To Third-party Ads

Image used with permission by copyright holder

Popular micro-blogging and social networking service Twitter has been looking at ways to earn real money from its widely-adopted platform, including selling real-time feeds of Twitter’s traffic to search engines and working on a “Promoted Tweets” system that will put paid-for tweets in Twitter search results. But now Twitter is also drawing a line in the sand: it’s barring third-party advertisements on the site in a move to “preserve the integrity and relevance” of timelines.

“Aside from Promoted Tweets, we will not allow any third party to inject paid tweets into a timeline on any service that leverages the Twitter API,” wrote Twitter’s COO Dick Costolo, in a blog post. “We are updating our Terms of Service to articulate clearly what we mean by this statement, and we encourage you to read the updated API Terms of Service to be released shortly.”

Costolo says that Twitter isn’t trying to control what people tweet via the service, and that the company believes there are ways to sell ads and built applications on top of Twitter’s service—such as Twitter clients that sell real-time ads around Twitter feeds. However, the Terms of Service for developers specifically prohibit placing advertisements in the Twitter timeline. Services that don’t generate revenue or that make money in ways other than advertising will apparently not be impacted by the change.

Although it’s tempting to say that Twitter’s new policy on third-party ads is all about drawing attention to its own (so far very limited) Promoted Tweets service, the reality is probably a little more complex. Twitter’s strength is its simplicity—it’s just a sequence of 140-character updates from a selected group of users or accounts someone might care about. Compared to a full blown Web site, that’s an incredibly fragile set of content that could easily be disrupted and reduced to irrelevance if it were contaminated with advertising. Twitter may actually be looking out for its users…and its own long-term health.

Editors' Recommendations

Geoff Duncan
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Geoff Duncan writes, programs, edits, plays music, and delights in making software misbehave. He's probably the only member…
Why is Twitter called X now? Here’s everything you need to know
A digital image of Elon Musk in front of a stylized background with the Twitter logo repeating.

Twitter is now called X, and it's causing some commotion. Since launching 17 years ago (nearly to the date at the time of writing), Twitter has been adorned with a blue bird. Now, it's a rather cryptic X brought on by the new owner of the social media platform, Elon Musk. Even though elements of the old Twitter remain, the iOS and Android apps have switched over to the new name, including the transition from "tweets" to "posts."

How did we get here? We've rounded up the order of events that took place leading to Twitter's massive rebrand to X, as well as how that relates to Elon Musk's entrepreneurial history and the legal troubles that could stem from the new name.
Why is Twitter called X now?

Read more
Hackers are using AI to create vicious malware, says FBI
A hacker typing on an Apple MacBook laptop while holding a phone. Both devices show code on their screens.

The FBI has warned that hackers are running wild with generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools like ChatGPT, quickly creating malicious code and launching cybercrime sprees that would have taken far more effort in the past.

The FBI detailed its concerns on a call with journalists and explained that AI chatbots have fuelled all kinds of illicit activity, from scammers and fraudsters perfecting their techniques to terrorists consulting the tools on how to launch more damaging chemical attacks.

Read more
Google is creating ‘internet surveillance DRM,’ critics say
Google Drive in Chrome on a MacBook.

Google is working on a system to fight fraud and make the internet “more private and safe,” but it’s just come in for some blistering criticism from software engineers behind the Vivaldi web browser. According to them, it’s a “dangerous” idea that could lead to greater surveillance of ordinary people.

The subject of this kerfuffle is Google’s Web Environment Integrity project, or WEI. Its purpose, Google says, is to stymy bad actors by providing a piece of code on a website that can be checked with a trusted attestor (such as Google) to ensure the visitor is who they say they are. That could prevent cheating in games, for example, or ensure that ads are being properly served to readers.

Read more