Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Emerging Tech
  3. News

Animal-A.I. Olympics will test bots against the latest animal intelligence tests

Add as a preferred source on Google

A few months back, we wrote about the Animal-A.I. Olympics, a then in-development competition which aimed to test top artificial intelligence agents by putting them through cognition tests designed for animals. This was intended to be open to anyone who wanted to create an A.I. they thought would be able to pass a battery of tests, all meant to measure some aspect of bot intelligence. Jump forward to the present day, and the contest has officially launched — with its creators releasing Version 1.0 of the test environment, and announcing the official rules for entrants, increased prize money, and other crucial information.

“For prizes, we now have $32,000 equivalent value, with $20,000 total in cash and travel reimbursement for the top three entries and the most biologically plausible entry,” Matthew Crosby, a postdoctoral A.I. researcher working on the project, told Digital Trends. “We are also giving out $10,000 worth of AWS credits half-way through — $500 to each of the top 20 entries — that can be used during the second half of the competition.”

Recommended Videos

As far as tests go, the team has bumped the number up from the originally planned 100 to a massive 300, split across 10 categories. All tests are either pass or fail, meaning a maximum score of 300 for the contest. These categories are arranged in order of increasing difficulty, starting with simple food retrieval in empty environments and ending with problems which require more complex causal reasoning to solve. However, participants won’t know what the tests involve — meaning they’ll have to create as general purpose an A.I. as possible.

Submissions open on July 8 and the contest itself will run through November 2019. During that time, participants can enter multiple times, which gives plenty of opportunity for improving personal scores. The final results will be presented at the NeurIPS 2019 conference in December.

“Given the wide variety of tasks, every interesting idea has the potential to win at least some prize,” Crosby continued. “We encourage everyone to just download the environment and play around with it to see what they can come up with. We also encourage them to submit their entry even in the early stages so that they can see how well it’s doing on the tasks. Given the variety of tasks, even a simple agent might solve some tasks that others are struggling at.”

Any further advice? “Try to make an agent that behaves like an animal,” Crosby said. “It should always want to get the most food it can. It should be keen to explore its environment when food is not readily available, and [be] able to make intelligent decisions when faced with multiple possibilities.”

And, just like that, your July Fourth holiday got filled up with homework!

Luke Dormehl
I'm a UK-based tech writer covering Cool Tech at Digital Trends. I've also written for Fast Company, Wired, the Guardian…
AI can’t tell if you’re gay or straight, but it thinks it knows what both look like
AI knows it shouldn't judge a face, but apparently, drawing one is a different story.
Emilia Clarke AI generated stock image. Gemini / Nano Banana is on the left

We've all been told not to judge a book by its cover, and you'd think AI would follow that rule, too. Ask an AI chatbot to guess someone's sexual orientation just by looking at their face, and it'll likely tell you that there's no reliable way to know. But what happens when you ask that same model to change someone's appearance to match a particular sexual orientation? Well, that's where things get uncomfortable.

A new study, accepted for presentation at the 2026 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, found that AI models from OpenAI and Google can be inconsistent when handling sensitive personal characteristics. They might refuse to make assumptions about someone based on their appearance, but when asked to generate those same assumptions visually, the results tell a very different story.

Read more
A clinical study with Google’s special chatbot shows a strong future for AI in healthcare
Google’s medical AI could give doctors a useful second set of eyes
Google Articulate Medical Intelligence Explorer chatbot

AI is a useful tool for handling many tasks in private as well as professional settings, but medical advice, especially diagnosis, is one area where I generally draw the line. General-purpose chatbots tend to sound confident and convincing while giving medical advice, even when they are wrong, as studies have previously found.

That being said, Google's new research points to a much more convincing use for AI in healthcare. Its Articulate Medical Intelligence Explorer chatbot, or AMIE for short, could help prepare both sides before the appointment even begins.

Read more
Relaxation music had one job in this pain study, and favorite songs did it better
Patients who chose their music reported less pain after an IV insertion
Book, Publication, Indoors

Patients’ favorite songs helped ease pain after an IV insertion in a new study, while music specifically chosen for relaxation didn’t show a significant benefit. The soothing soundtrack could apparently use a second opinion.

Researchers at University Hospital Zürich studied 204 patients receiving an IV cannula before an MRI scan. Those listening to their chosen music reported less pain 30 seconds and two minutes after insertion. Across the full sample, the clearest relief came after the needle went in.

Read more