Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Emerging Tech
  3. News

Elon Musk fires back at British diver who was critical of his submarine

Add as a preferred source on Google

While Elon Musk’s offer of a submarine to help rescue 12 boys and their soccer coach from a Thailand cave made for interesting news, not everyone is thrilled with Musk. During an interview with CNN, Vern Unsworth, a British diver who played a major role in the rescue, grew exasperated when asked his thoughts on Musk’s submarine.  Calling the device a “PR stunt,” Unsworth said that the sub’s design would have made it impossible to navigate the tight corridors of the cave.

The famously prickly billionaire did not take kindly to Unsworth’s assertion that his submarine was a simple PR stunt. In a Twitter thread, Musk attacked Unsworth and called him a “pedo guy.” As of right now, Unsworth has not responded to Musk’s most recent comments. However, many people on Twitter felt that Musk crossed a line by accusing Unsworth of being a pedophile. At least one user went so far as to suggest Unsworth file a defamation lawsuit against Musk.

Recommended Videos

https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1018496446415306752

https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1018497953051258880

https://twitter.com/MaxKennerly/status/1018520207739015171

Prior to the rescue, Musk said engineers from his companies were heading to Thailand “to see if we can be helpful” to the rescue operations. In order to assist with the operation, Musk brought in engineers from Tesla, SpaceX, and the Boring Company. On July 8, Musk shared images of a submarine his team had come up with to help rescue the trapped children. Musk shared photos and videos of a miniature submarine that could potentially help transport the boys from the cave to safety.

Simulating maneuvering through a narrow passage pic.twitter.com/2z01Ut3vxJ

— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) July 9, 2018

“According to divers who have made the journey, this is capable of maneuvering through all passages,” Musk said on Twitter at the time. “Hopefully useful. If not, perhaps it will be in a future situation,” the entrepreneur wrote.

pic.twitter.com/D1umiFDr1t

— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) July 8, 2018

The soccer team, comprised of 12 young boys, along with their coach, were reported missing in late June. They were exploring the Tham Luang cave complex in northern Thailand, which is known to flood during the rainy months of the summer. They were ultimately found by rescuers 10 days after originally becoming trapped in the cave and the last members of the team were extracted on July 10.

Updated on July 14: Updated with diver Vern Unsworth’s thoughts on the rescue sub.

Lulu Chang
Fascinated by the effects of technology on human interaction, Lulu believes that if her parents can use your new app…
Pangram, the gold standard for AI text checks, releases Image 1.0 tool to sniff fake pics and videos
It can identify AI-generated pictures with an astounding 99.96% accuracy on its own evaluation set.
AI image detector tool pangram

Pangram, one of the most widely used and trusted AI text detectors out there, is finally releasing its multimedia detection tools to the masses. Pangram Image 1.0, which was previously available as a research preview, is now widely available on the web, through the company’s API, and via its eponymous Chrome extension.

The company claims its image detector can identify AI-generated pictures with an astounding 99.96% accuracy on its own evaluation set. Pangram also notes that it has improved the model’s accuracy over the past few months, especially against edited images, low-resolution pictures, and pictures made by the most advanced AI models out there. As far as the competition goes, TruthScan achieves an accuracy of 96.33%, followed by AI or Not at 91.38% and Sightengine at 88.33%.

Read more
Scammers are using AI to fake missing pet photos, and what happens next is horrifying
Criminals are using AI-generated pet photos to convince desperate owners their missing animals have been found, before demanding money and making disturbing threats.
Brown and white cat meowing in Inzoi.

Losing a pet can be heartbreaking, and anyone who's experienced it knows how quickly you'd drop everything if someone called to say they'd found your missing dog or cat. Unfortunately, scammers have learned to exploit that desperation, and AI is making their tricks even more convincing.

A disturbing new scam is targeting pet owners across the UK, with criminals using AI-generated images to pretend they've found missing animals. They then demand money for their return, sometimes going as far as threatening to kill the pets if the owners refuse to pay. According to a BBC report, several pet owners have already experienced these attacks, with scammers using convincing photographs, emotional stories, and increasingly aggressive messages to pressure them into paying.

Read more
AI can turn your Instagram posts into scam that know a little too much about you
Your public social media posts could be helping scammers create emails that feel personal, and existing AI safeguards aren't doing enough to stop them.
Electronics, Mobile Phone, Phone

We've all received those suspicious emails claiming we've won something, missed a delivery, or need to urgently update our bank details. Most are easy enough to ignore, especially when they're full of strange wording or have absolutely nothing to do with us. But what happens when a scam email actually knows what you've been up to lately? That's where things get a little worrying.

Researchers at the University of Texas at Arlington have found that AI can use information people share publicly on social media to create phishing emails that feel personal. And we're not just talking about knowing your name or where you work. These emails can reference things you've recently done, places you've visited, or even something you've been looking forward to. The researchers showed how widely available AI models could gather these details and turn them into targeted messages, potentially letting scammers reach large numbers of people without spending hours researching each person individually.

Read more