Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Emerging Tech
  3. News

Chinese scientists just achieved a 90 million degree Fahrenheit nuclear fusion test

Add as a preferred source on Google

The quest for sustainable nuclear fusion took a dramatic step forward this week as a team of scientists in China reportedly created plasma registering at a blistering 90 million degrees Fahrenheit — i.e. three times hotter than the core of the sun. While hotter temperatures have been achieved elsewhere (by the Large Hadron Collider, for instance), the most fascinating piece of the test is the fact the trial maintained the balmy warmth for roughly 102 seconds.

Taking place in Hefei, China’s Experimental Advanced Superconducting Tokamak (or, EAST), scientists conducted the experiment in a donut-shaped reactor that uses an extremely powerful magnetic field. While in use, this magnetic field restrains the plasma into the shape of a torus (or donut) to avoid it making contact with the reactor’s metallic sides. Because of this, the sides of the reactor never actually come in contact with the 90 million degree plasma — of which is desired to avoid anything catastrophic happening.

The donut-shaped reactor
The donut-shaped reactor Hefei Institute of Physical Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences

As mentioned above, the sheer fact China was able to sustain such a high temperature for over a minute and a half is an extremely encouraging step forward. However, EAST would need to continuously sustain an even hotter temperature (think 180 million degrees Fahrenheit) for extended periods of time to successfully create usable energy. What makes a successful trial like this especially appealing is that if a reaction was able to continuously sustain itself at high temperatures, it would essentially create an endless energy source as powerful as the sun. In a time when Earth’s natural resources continue to dwindle, the prospect of this achievement is utterly fascinating.

Recommended Videos

According to the Institute of Physical Science in Hefei, scientists worked “day and night” on perfecting the trial’s endurance. By reportedly controlling the precise alignments of each magnet and capturing the high-energy particles escaping torus-shaped plasma, the team was able to overcome many of the issues experienced during past tests. Despite the successes, the team says it actually intended to heat the plasma to roughly 100 million Kelvin (180 million degrees Fahrenheit) and wished to sustain it for 17 minutes. Afterwards, it admitted it might still take decades before a viable plant exists to execute such a test.

It should be noted the results of the test came from the institute itself — with no peer-reviewed paper detailing the exact process, no less — so it’s likely the experiment is met with some skepticism among the scientific community. Accredited reviews notwithstanding, the reported findings are no doubt an extremely promising step forward in the world of nuclear fusion and finding a potential remedy to Earth’s energy dilemma.

Rick Stella
Former Associate Editor, Outdoor
Rick became enamored with technology the moment his parents got him an original NES for Christmas in 1991. And as they say…
Meta goes toe-to-toe with the big boys as it launches Muse Wonder AI models
Illustration of Meta Muse Wonder AI model.

It's raining frontier AI models. Soon after Anthropic set alarm bells ringing with its Claude Fable model at the summit of AI peformance, OpenAI answered with GPT-6 Astra. Not one to be left behind, Google released Gemini 4 Argon. The race is now getting hotter as Meta enters the fray with two new AI models in the Muse series: Wonder and Wonder Full. Cheesy naming aside, these Meta AI models mean business, or at least that's what the benchmark figures suggest. More importantly, these AI models are already making their way to Muse users.

https://twitter.com/DigitalTrends/status/2109699549375988120

Read more
AI can’t tell if you’re gay or straight, but it thinks it knows what both look like
AI knows it shouldn't judge a face, but apparently, drawing one is a different story.
Emilia Clarke AI generated stock image. Gemini / Nano Banana is on the left

We've all been told not to judge a book by its cover, and you'd think AI would follow that rule, too. Ask an AI chatbot to guess someone's sexual orientation just by looking at their face, and it'll likely tell you that there's no reliable way to know. But what happens when you ask that same model to change someone's appearance to match a particular sexual orientation? Well, that's where things get uncomfortable.

A new study, accepted for presentation at the 2026 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, found that AI models from OpenAI and Google can be inconsistent when handling sensitive personal characteristics. They might refuse to make assumptions about someone based on their appearance, but when asked to generate those same assumptions visually, the results tell a very different story.

Read more
A clinical study with Google’s special chatbot shows a strong future for AI in healthcare
Google’s medical AI could give doctors a useful second set of eyes
Google Articulate Medical Intelligence Explorer chatbot

AI is a useful tool for handling many tasks in private as well as professional settings, but medical advice, especially diagnosis, is one area where I generally draw the line. General-purpose chatbots tend to sound confident and convincing while giving medical advice, even when they are wrong, as studies have previously found.

That being said, Google's new research points to a much more convincing use for AI in healthcare. Its Articulate Medical Intelligence Explorer chatbot, or AMIE for short, could help prepare both sides before the appointment even begins.

Read more