Skip to main content

Facial-recognition algorithm will tell you if you look more like Clinton or Trump

how to follow election results online 2016 presidential trump clinton debate watch
It’s no secret that Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump were two of the most popular Halloween costumes this year.

But how much do you resemble either of the presidential candidates for the 2016 election cycle, without the use of fake tan or pantsuits? Ntechlab, the company behind one of the world’s most accurate facial recognition systems, want to give you a way of finding out.

FaceElections 2016 is a project designed to give everyone the opportunity to compare their face to the faces of the two main presidential candidates in America,” Ntechlab co-founder Alexander Kabakov told Digital Trends. “We’ve got maybe the best algorithm in the world for facial recognition, and we thought it would be interesting to voters to be able to see the degree of similarity they share, expressed as a number.”

Ntechlab’s FindFace system made waves last year when its beat one developed by Google for University of Washington’s Megaface Championship 2015. At the event, FindFace achieved an impressive 73 percent accuracy with a database of 1 million pictures. When that number dropped to 10,000 images, the system’s accuracy rose to 95 percent.

Since then, it has used its expertise to create a facial recognition-based dating app which has racked up more than 1 million users — although the idea of doing a new project based on this year’s presidential race proved too tempting to ignore.

FaceElection 2016 is a free website, which lets users upload an image of themselves and the website assigns a similarity score to both Clinton and Trump.

screen-shot-2016-10-31-at-20-21-37

Does it work? Given that there is no objective measure to be had on whether we really are facially 54 percent Donald Trump, it is tough to determine for certain. Uploading pictures of ourselves never resulted in looking more Hillary than Donald, although the numbers did change depending on the image we uploaded. On the other hand, images of Trump and Clinton throughout their lives were successfully recognized as the person in question.

One interesting detail is that Kabakov said that the neural network used for measuring similarity was tweaked to avoid weighting gender too heavily. “We developed a gender-tolerant algorithm so that your own gender and that of the candidate is not taken too much into consideration,” he said. “If you’re a woman, it won’t automatically say you’re similar to Hillary Clinton, while men won’t automatically be taken as looking similar to Donald Trump. Gender is one of the points of similarity, but it’s not the main one. We have many others, such as the type of face, the sizes of eyes and more.”

So do voters tend to vote for candidates who look like them, like the old saying about dogs resembling their owners (or vice versa)? “We haven’t researched that, but it’s definitely an interesting question,” Kabakov laughed.

Maybe we will find out as people share the results on social media.

Editors' Recommendations

Luke Dormehl
I'm a UK-based tech writer covering Cool Tech at Digital Trends. I've also written for Fast Company, Wired, the Guardian…
Facebook wants you to get political by endorsing a presidential candidate
social election night 2016 presidential trump clinton debate feat

Facebook has already had an impact on voter registration this election season, and now it wants to know who you’ll be voting for come polling day.

The world’s biggest social network is launching an "Endorsements" feature that allows you to share your support for a U.S. political candidate with your friends, or publicly with everyone.

Read more
If your stomach voted this November, would it vote for Donald Trump or Hillary Clinton?
doordash presidential election menu hillary clinton

It's getting harder and harder for some Americans to stomach the notion of November's election. But just maybe, as the national issues at stake seem to take a backseat to the candidates' personal histories, voters can find a new North Star by which to guide their decisions in just a few weeks -- their stomachs. Because if either or both candidates make you nauseous, maybe the best way to consider them is by considering their favorite foods.
At least, that appears to be the approach taken by food delivery company DoorDash, which crunched delivery data from millions of orders on the alleged food favorites of Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton to determine who would win if we voted with our stomachs.
By sourcing the foods and meals that each candidate has called his or her respective favorite, DoorDash created a "political menu" that pits not man against woman, but burger against meatloaf.
At breakfast, you'll have to choose between Trump's bacon and eggs or Clinton's well-done scrambled eggs. For lunch, would you rather partake in Clinton's soy burger, or Trump's family favorite meatloaf? To end your day, you can either have a well-done steak a la Trump, or a cod biryani from Clinton. 
As for snacks, choose between Clinton's hummus or Trump's deep-fried mac and cheese. And for the most important meal, dessert, would you opt for Trump's cherry vanilla ice cream, or Clinton's chocolate ice cream sandwich? According to DoorDash, "the state by state data shows that political allegiances are blurred when we put our bellies in charge." Because really, there's no greater unifier than the dinner table, right?
If voters were to listen only to their hunger pangs, Trump would win the blue regions of Washington, D.C., Southern California, New York City, Minneapolis, Denver, and Boston. He'd also take historically red regions San Antonio, Indianapolis, and Atlanta. As for Clinton, she'd actually have a bit more luck with Republican areas, taking Phoenix, Nashville, Houston, Dallas, and Charlotte, North Carolina. She'd also win over more Democratic areas like Seattle, Northern California, Columbus, and Chicago.
“Everyone has their favorite foods and flavors, even presidential candidates,” said Christopher Payne, COO at DoorDash. “While our country still may be divided on many issues, we think everyone would agree that there’s no better way to end a day then relaxing at home with your favorite meal.”
So keep these in mind as you watch tonight's debate over your own favorite meal (or snack) -- and don't worry. Even if you're eating cherry vanilla ice cream or a chocolate ice cream sandwich tonight, it doesn't mean you have to cast a vote in that direction come November.

Read more
Watch Hillary Clinton regret going on talk show with Zach Galifianakis
hillary clinton between two ferns zach galifianakis

The U.S. presidential campaign continues to dominate the headlines as we get closer to November's Election Day, and both of the major parties' candidates have been showing up in some interesting places as they make the media rounds. Case in point: Democratic Party candidate Hillary Clinton's recent appearance on Funny or Die's faux talk show Between Two Ferns.

Surprisingly, it takes Clinton a little over two minutes of being badgered by the show's host, comedian and actor Zach Galifianakis, to announce that she "really regrets doing this."

Read more