Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Emerging Tech
  3. News

Crawling robot is helping reveal locomotion secrets from 360 million years ago

Add as a preferred source on Google

A team of physicists, biologists, and roboticists from the Georgia Institute of Technology, Clemson University, and Carnegie Mellon University are using robots to explore how the first animals crawled on land 360 million years ago — by creating a robot modeled on the African mudskipper fish, which is able to propel itself in both water and land.

The work is not only helping us understand more about the way that the first creatures to crawl out of the water moved, but also to learn valuable lessons that could make future robots more efficient at moving on surfaces such as sand and mud, which are typically tough to negotiate.

“I call the work that I do robo-physics,” Professor Dan Goldman, who worked on the project, told Digital Trends. “This isn’t a robot that’s designed to go out into natural complicated environments. It’s designed as a model of a biological life form we’re trying to understand — in this case an extinct organism. Using it we can discover incredible things we never knew about the movement of animals millions of years ago.”

Recommended Videos

So far the robot has helped researchers formulate theories, including the idea that early land-crawlers may have used their powerful tails more than previously thought — mainly as a means to propel themselves forward up steep slopes.

The so-called “MuddyBot” robot combined information from fossil records with 3D-printed elements and a mathematical physics-based model to help recreate the movement of prehistoric creatures.

“Building a robot is a great way of understanding the animal we’re studying,” Goldman continues. “You’re talking about an extinct creature interacting with environments like mud and sand banks, which present a challenge from a physics perspective. Mathematical modelling, along with building a physical robot, lets us isolate particular elements we think are important in the mechanical intelligence of the locomotor — and then figure out what it is about those elements that are important or unimportant for tasks.”

While MuddyBot remains a research project right now, the fact that the work is sponsored by the National Science Foundation, the Army Research Office, and the Army Research Laboratory suggests that the findings could one day be applied to real-world scenarios.

Doing so will help robots become even more versatile than they already are.

Luke Dormehl
I'm a UK-based tech writer covering Cool Tech at Digital Trends. I've also written for Fast Company, Wired, the Guardian…
Yet another study says AI is bad for elections, and the rabbit hole gets worse
AI may be an election bomb waiting for someone to light the fuse
Voters cast their ballots on Election Day

Another election, another study has concluded that asking an AI chatbot for political guidance is a spectacularly bad idea. Research conducted during Hungary’s 2026 parliamentary election found that ChatGPT and Google Gemini offered not just inaccurate but also inconsistent and unreliable voting advice. The chatbots misclassified voter profiles, overlooked relevant parties, recommended parties absent from the ballot, and sometimes produced materially different answers when given the same information repeatedly.

AI keeps failing the voter test

Read more
Samsung’s humanoid robot ambitions are real, but factories come first
Samsung’s new robotics division has humanoids in its sights, although its immediate business is far more practical factory automation
Robot Touch Human Finger

Samsung wants a place in the humanoid race, but its new robotics push begins with machines built for factories rather than homes.

The CEO-led RX robotics division will initially focus on manufacturing robots. Samsung has separately identified humanoids as a priority, although it hasn’t announced a commercial model or explained where one fits into the division’s immediate plans.

Read more
The future of AI may depend on this one behind-the-scenes change
Running Claude on Android.

Whenever a new AI model arrives, it's easy to get caught up in the bells and whistles. We talk about how much smarter it is, how quickly it answers questions, or how realistic its images have become. But here's the thing: none of that matters much if the AI can't reliably work with the apps and services people use every day.

That's why an upcoming update to the Model Context Protocol (MCP) caught my attention. It isn't a new chatbot or a fancy AI model. In fact, most people will never even know it's happening. But it could quietly make the AI ecosystem a lot healthier. If you've never heard of MCP before, don't worry. Think of it as a shared language that lets AI assistants safely talk to apps like Gmail, Slack, calendars, databases, and countless other services. Instead of every company inventing its own way to make those connections, MCP gives everyone a common rulebook.

Read more