Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Emerging Tech
  3. News

Analog DNA computers can perform math inside a test tube

Add as a preferred source on Google

The discovery of DNA was one of the most important scientific events of the twentieth century, revealing the instructions which make up every single living thing on Earth. However, more recently researchers have been tapping into DNA with the dream of building tiny nanoscale computers.

With that goal in mind, a team of Duke University researchers have demonstrated the creation of synthetic strands of DNA that, mixed together in the right concentrations in a test tube, can create analog circuits able to add, subtract, and multiply as they form and break bonds.

Recommended Videos

“Most prior methods for computing at the molecular scale generally were restricted to logical computations involving Boolean values: 1 for yes and 0 for no,” Professor John Reif, whose computer science lab carried out the work, told Digital Trends. “[This] work allows for arithmetic computations on analog values that can range over real numbers like 0.832. The analog values — these include the inputs, intermediate values, and outputs of the molecular computations — are specified by the concentrations of certain DNA strands.”

Previous researchers have used digital DNA-based circuits to carry out tasks like playing tic-tac-toe, or even calculating the square root of numbers. However, Duke University’s analog device doesn’t require any dedicated circuitry to convert computations into zeroes and ones — but instead directly measures the concentration of specific DNA molecules.

In other words, it’s exciting stuff, with some unique possibilities. For one thing, DNA circuits can be considerably smaller than those created with silicon. Unlike electronic circuits, they also work perfectly well in wet environments: something which opens up the possibility of computers existing inside a person’s bloodstream or even individual cells.

But there are still challenges that need to be solved to reach that point. Professor Reif said that the two main bottlenecks right now relate to speed and scale. “The experiments required an hour or so to perform the computations,” he said. “The scale is [also] restricted so far to relatively small arithmetic circuits.”

So you probably won’t be sweeping your MacBook to one side in favor of some DNA and a test tube just yet. But then again, it was only a relatively short time ago when people were saying that personal computers would never be capable of more than the most basic of tasks.

Roll on with the DNA computers!

Luke Dormehl
I'm a UK-based tech writer covering Cool Tech at Digital Trends. I've also written for Fast Company, Wired, the Guardian…
Yet another study says AI is bad for elections, and the rabbit hole gets worse
AI may be an election bomb waiting for someone to light the fuse
Voters cast their ballots on Election Day

Another election, another study has concluded that asking an AI chatbot for political guidance is a spectacularly bad idea. Research conducted during Hungary’s 2026 parliamentary election found that ChatGPT and Google Gemini offered not just inaccurate but also inconsistent and unreliable voting advice. The chatbots misclassified voter profiles, overlooked relevant parties, recommended parties absent from the ballot, and sometimes produced materially different answers when given the same information repeatedly.

AI keeps failing the voter test

Read more
Samsung’s humanoid robot ambitions are real, but factories come first
Samsung’s new robotics division has humanoids in its sights, although its immediate business is far more practical factory automation
Robot Touch Human Finger

Samsung wants a place in the humanoid race, but its new robotics push begins with machines built for factories rather than homes.

The CEO-led RX robotics division will initially focus on manufacturing robots. Samsung has separately identified humanoids as a priority, although it hasn’t announced a commercial model or explained where one fits into the division’s immediate plans.

Read more
The future of AI may depend on this one behind-the-scenes change
Running Claude on Android.

Whenever a new AI model arrives, it's easy to get caught up in the bells and whistles. We talk about how much smarter it is, how quickly it answers questions, or how realistic its images have become. But here's the thing: none of that matters much if the AI can't reliably work with the apps and services people use every day.

That's why an upcoming update to the Model Context Protocol (MCP) caught my attention. It isn't a new chatbot or a fancy AI model. In fact, most people will never even know it's happening. But it could quietly make the AI ecosystem a lot healthier. If you've never heard of MCP before, don't worry. Think of it as a shared language that lets AI assistants safely talk to apps like Gmail, Slack, calendars, databases, and countless other services. Instead of every company inventing its own way to make those connections, MCP gives everyone a common rulebook.

Read more