Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Emerging Tech
  3. News

Scientists witness evolution in progress, create new species in a test tube

Add as a preferred source on Google

It’s not every day that you get to see evolution happen before your eyes. Scratch that, until very recently, it wasn’t any day, since the process of speciation — in which one species splits into two distinct ones — takes place far too slowly to directly observe.

That’s now changed thanks to a groundbreaking piece of research in which scientists were able to observe speciation taking place in a laboratory setting, with one virus splitting into two new species over the course of a single month.

Recommended Videos

“Historically, this inability to directly observe the process [of speciation] has led some individuals to doubt the role of evolution in creating the many species that live today,” Justin Meyer, an assistant professor of biology at University of California, San Diego, told Digital Trends. “Not being able to show speciation in action is often a reason creationists cite for why Darwin’s theory is wrong and evolution does not occur. With this study, we have punched a major hole in their argument. Even more importantly, we have provided a novel experimental system where speciation can be observed in action and directly studied.”

The system Professor Meyer and his colleagues have created will be used to test many longstanding theories and move the study of speciation forward.

lamb-and-ompf
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Meyer said that he first became interested in speciation when he enrolled on a course about it as an undergrad in 2002, taught by the evolutionary biologist Professor Richard Harrison.

“During the class we learned about a lot of data that supported sympatric speciation, however, there were always doubts and no way to convince the skeptics that sympatric speciation was possible,” he continued. “I became interested in this problem because it seemed to address a fundamental question about evolution. Is speciation an intrinsic property of life, or does it require an external factor like geography to catalyze the separation?”

Meyer was fascinated by the issue of whether or not it is possible to directly observe speciation.

“I didn’t come to the solution until many years later when I developed this bacteriophage lambda system,” he said. “Lambda rapidly evolved in laboratory conditions, so I could watch its evolution in action. Lambda particles interbreed or recombine their DNA with one another, so I could test the effects of recombination on its speciation. With this system in hand, we ran the experiment and sure enough, we witnessed speciation in allopatry, and even more importantly, in sympatry.”

What this means, Meyer said, is that under the right circumstances, populations will naturally split into two new species without any external driver — making it a natural automatic property of their biology.

Meyer has every reason to be happy, although he noted that it is somewhat bittersweet since Professor Harrison, the man who inspired him, passed away earlier this year at the age of 70.

“I would have never pursued this project if he hadn’t been such a fabulous teacher,” he told us. “I am very sad that he wasn’t alive to see this work published, although I did have a chance to share preliminary results a few years ago. It’s amazing the impact good teachers can have on one’s life.” Now that’s a sentiment everyone can agree with.

For more on the work carried out by Meyer and colleagues at UC San Diego and Michigan State University, check out their paper published in Science, titled “Ecological speciation of bacteriophage lambda in allopatry and sympatry.”

Luke Dormehl
I'm a UK-based tech writer covering Cool Tech at Digital Trends. I've also written for Fast Company, Wired, the Guardian…
Anthropic’s sensitive internal data was exposed, and AI helped make it happen
Even the company behind Claude isn't immune to AI-powered security threats, as researchers discovered some worrying vulnerabilities.
Claude Anthropic Featured

AI companies spend enormous amounts of time convincing us their technology is safe and secure. But what happens when those same companies become targets of increasingly sophisticated AI-powered attacks? Anthropic, the company behind Claude, is now facing that question. According to a Washington Post report, cybersecurity startup Cathedral discovered vulnerabilities that let its researchers access sensitive information in Anthropic's internal systems.

The researchers used AI agents to identify potential entry points in less than 12 hours. Interestingly, they didn't need to crack Claude itself. Instead, they exploited weaknesses in third-party business applications that Anthropic uses for everyday operations. Anthropic's security testing program disclosed the findings, which allows outside researchers to identify and report vulnerabilities.

Read more
A new startup wants to fix the military’s working-dog shortage with cloning and gene editing
Promising pitch, plenty of unanswered questions about the dogs.
a new startup wants to fix the militarys working dog shortage with cloning and gene editing warhound featured image

Military working dogs charge into places the rest of us would flee. So, I understand why anyone would want to breed tougher, healthier dogs for the job.

Warhound, a new startup from Colossal Biosciences co-founder Ben Lamm and Anduril co-founder Palmer Luckey, has stepped out of stealth with $200 million to clone and gene-edit working dogs for American troops, police departments, and emergency services (via TechCrunch).

Read more
AI can describe a picture, but it still struggles to understand blind users
A University of Maryland study finds that Be My AI often buries useful answers in lengthy descriptions, leaving blind users to work harder to get the information they need.
Blind Man using walking stick

AI can describe a picture, identify objects, and answer questions about what a camera sees. But when a blind user needs a quick answer, getting an entire spoken essay about the scene isn't exactly helpful. Researchers at the University of Maryland (UMD) have found that AI-powered visual assistance can leave blind users doing too much work to get the information they actually need.

The study, titled Say It My Way: Exploring Control in Conversational Visual Question Answering with Blind Users, examined how people interact with Be My AI, an AI-powered feature of the Be My Eyes app. The researchers found that users often received lengthy descriptions that didn't adequately address their immediate goals, forcing them to ask follow-up questions or find ways to steer the AI towards a more useful answer.

Read more