Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Emerging Tech
  3. Health & Fitness
  4. News

Scientists say they can tell how smart you are by analyzing MRI scans of your brain

Add as a preferred source on Google

Can brain scans detect human intellect? It sounds pretty far-out, but scientists from the University of Warwick think it could be possible.

More dynamic brains with more interactive regions correlate with higher IQs and creativity in their subjects, according to research by Warwick’s Professor Jianfeng Feng, who published a paper in the Oxford University journal Brain.

Recommended Videos

Feng analyzed resting-state MRI scans of thousands of people’s brains, which showed that brain regions associated intelligence – such as learning and development — are relatively variable. In other words, they change their neural connections more often than regions that are less associated with intelligence — such as control of visual, auditory, and sensory-motor functions.

By deciphering how brain regions interact with each other at various times, a team led by Feng hopes to unravel intelligence with data that may assist advancements in artificial intelligence and mental health.

Today’s AI systems are relatively inflexible compared the human brain, which many of the most prevalent systems — such as neural networks — are modeled off of. Through his research, Feng hopes to inform AI development by further connecting the qualities of variability and adaptability to intelligence.

Mental health issues such as schizophrenia, autism, and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) have also been correlated to altered states of variability in brain networks, according to Feng’s research. He and his team hope to provide the basis for future treatment and prevention of these diseases. The group has big ambitions and there’s still plenty of work to be done, but Feng credits much of his research to recent advancements in imaging technologies.

“Human intelligence is a widely and hotly debated topic and only recently have advanced brain imaging techniques, such as those used in our current study, given us the opportunity to gain sufficient insights to resolve this and inform developments in artificial intelligence, as well as help establish the basis for understanding and diagnosis of debilitating human mental disorders such as schizophrenia and depression,” Feng said in a Warwick news release.

Dyllan Furness
Former Contributor
Dyllan Furness is a freelance writer from Florida. He covers strange science and emerging tech for Digital Trends, focusing…
Yet another study says AI is bad for elections, and the rabbit hole gets worse
AI may be an election bomb waiting for someone to light the fuse
Voters cast their ballots on Election Day

Another election, another study has concluded that asking an AI chatbot for political guidance is a spectacularly bad idea. Research conducted during Hungary’s 2026 parliamentary election found that ChatGPT and Google Gemini offered not just inaccurate but also inconsistent and unreliable voting advice. The chatbots misclassified voter profiles, overlooked relevant parties, recommended parties absent from the ballot, and sometimes produced materially different answers when given the same information repeatedly.

AI keeps failing the voter test

Read more
Samsung’s humanoid robot ambitions are real, but factories come first
Samsung’s new robotics division has humanoids in its sights, although its immediate business is far more practical factory automation
Robot Touch Human Finger

Samsung wants a place in the humanoid race, but its new robotics push begins with machines built for factories rather than homes.

The CEO-led RX robotics division will initially focus on manufacturing robots. Samsung has separately identified humanoids as a priority, although it hasn’t announced a commercial model or explained where one fits into the division’s immediate plans.

Read more
The future of AI may depend on this one behind-the-scenes change
Running Claude on Android.

Whenever a new AI model arrives, it's easy to get caught up in the bells and whistles. We talk about how much smarter it is, how quickly it answers questions, or how realistic its images have become. But here's the thing: none of that matters much if the AI can't reliably work with the apps and services people use every day.

That's why an upcoming update to the Model Context Protocol (MCP) caught my attention. It isn't a new chatbot or a fancy AI model. In fact, most people will never even know it's happening. But it could quietly make the AI ecosystem a lot healthier. If you've never heard of MCP before, don't worry. Think of it as a shared language that lets AI assistants safely talk to apps like Gmail, Slack, calendars, databases, and countless other services. Instead of every company inventing its own way to make those connections, MCP gives everyone a common rulebook.

Read more