Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Emerging Tech
  3. News

Did SpaceX lose the classified Zuma payload during its latest launch?

Elon Musk's space company insists the loss of Zuma satellite was not its fault

Add as a preferred source on Google

SpaceX on Sunday, January 7, launched a rocket carrying a classified satellite code-named Zuma, built by Northrop Grumman for the United States government.

While the initial stages of the mission seemed to go plan, it now appears there was a serious problem with the deployment of the satellite, with multiple news reports suggesting it fell back to Earth after failing to separate from the spent upper stage of SpaceX’s Falcon 9 rocket. The first stage landed intact, as planned.

Recommended Videos

Although failing to clarify precisely what happened, SpaceX president Gwynne Shotwell insisted in a statement on Tuesday that SpaceX “did everything correctly” during the mysterious mission.

“After review of all data to date, Falcon 9 did everything correctly on Sunday night,” Shotwell said. “If we or others find otherwise based on further review, we will report it immediately. Due to the classified nature of the payload, no further comment is possible.”

A U.S. official confirmed to ABC News on Tuesday that the satellite failed to remain in orbit, while Bloomberg reported U.S. Strategic Command as saying it wasn’t tracking any new satellites, suggesting Zuma failed to properly deploy.

Mystery has always surrounded the mission, with no information ever offered about Zuma’s role prior to the launch, though the suggestion is it contained powerful surveillance technology.

SpaceX’s failure to confirm the mission as a success on Sunday left many wondering if everything had gone to plan, and on Monday the Wall Street Journal reported that House and Senate lawmakers had been informed of the “botched mission.”

If SpaceX did lose Zuma — a satellite estimated to be worth more than $1 billion — it would be a serious blow for the private space company. Headed by billionaire entrepreneur Elon Musk, SpaceX had been getting back on track with a string of successful launches and an increasingly busy mission schedule following a disaster in September 2016, when one of its rockets exploded on a Cape Canaveral launchpad during pre-mission preparations. Social networking giant Facebook lost its Amos-6 satellite in the explosion, which was set to play a role in the company’s internet-serving venture. SpaceX grounded its operations for several months while it worked out what went wrong, before resuming launches at the start of 2017.

Another disaster would tarnish its reputation as a reliable deliverer of satellites into orbit, and might prompt future clients to look to competing companies to take their equipment into space.

In response to inquiries about Sunday’s mission, Northrop Grumman would only say, “This is a classified mission. We cannot comment on classified missions.”

It’s still not entirely clear what precisely happened during last weekend’s mission, but SpaceX is insisting its own systems performed as expected.

[Updated to include SpaceX statement.]

Trevor Mogg
Contributing Editor
Not so many moons ago, Trevor moved from one tea-loving island nation that drives on the left (Britain) to another (Japan)…
Forget smartwatches; this smart bed could soon help keep you safe from being a fall risk
Who needs another wearable when your mattress could help spot fall risks?
Bed

Soon, a mattress protector may be more than a bed cover. Australian medtech company Sleeptite and researchers at RMIT University have received a US patent for FlexiSense, a smart bedding technology that tracks body position and posture to help caregivers identify when older residents may be at risk of falling.

The technology is being developed for Sleeptite’s in-bed monitoring system, REMi, and was recently on display at The MedTech Conference in Boston. A peer-reviewed study in Flexible and Printed Electronics says the sensors can also be made at scale without sacrificing performance or durability.

Read more
Anthropic’s sensitive internal data was exposed, and AI helped make it happen
Even the company behind Claude isn't immune to AI-powered security threats, as researchers discovered some worrying vulnerabilities.
Claude Anthropic Featured

AI companies spend enormous amounts of time convincing us their technology is safe and secure. But what happens when those same companies become targets of increasingly sophisticated AI-powered attacks? Anthropic, the company behind Claude, is now facing that question. According to a Washington Post report, cybersecurity startup Cathedral discovered vulnerabilities that let its researchers access sensitive information in Anthropic's internal systems.

The researchers used AI agents to identify potential entry points in less than 12 hours. Interestingly, they didn't need to crack Claude itself. Instead, they exploited weaknesses in third-party business applications that Anthropic uses for everyday operations. Anthropic's security testing program disclosed the findings, which allows outside researchers to identify and report vulnerabilities.

Read more
A new startup wants to fix the military’s working-dog shortage with cloning and gene editing
Promising pitch, plenty of unanswered questions about the dogs.
a new startup wants to fix the militarys working dog shortage with cloning and gene editing warhound featured image

Military working dogs charge into places the rest of us would flee. So, I understand why anyone would want to breed tougher, healthier dogs for the job.

Warhound, a new startup from Colossal Biosciences co-founder Ben Lamm and Anduril co-founder Palmer Luckey, has stepped out of stealth with $200 million to clone and gene-edit working dogs for American troops, police departments, and emergency services (via TechCrunch).

Read more