Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Emerging Tech
  3. Entertainment
  4. News

Stanford team proves Cambridge and Colbert wrong: Spider-Man can definitely climb walls

Add as a preferred source on Google

As comic-book publishers plot world domination, the plausibility of some of the industry’s most famous characters has come up for debate. Researchers at the University of Cambridge announced last week that Spider-Man’s wall-scaling capabilities were bogus, based on their scholarly calculations. But a Stanford team struck back, resurfacing their own Gecko Glove invention to prove that even if the tech isn’t perfect, Spider-Man’s superpowers are definitely possible.

The Cambridge team had claimed that sticky pads in Spider-Man’s hands and feet would not scale up in adequate proportion to support an average human’s weight and build. According to Cambridge, a gecko would be the largest physically possible version of a wall-climbing creature.

Recommended Videos

“If a human, for example, wanted to walk up a wall the way a gecko does, we’d need impractically large sticky feet — our shoes would need to be a European size 145 or a U.S. size 114,” said Walter Federle, senior author of the paper and a member of Cambridge’s Department of Zoology.

Stanford researcher Elliot Hawkes set out to demonstrate a very different proof of Spider-Man’s sticky fingers with Gecko Gloves. While they won’t give anyone Spider-Man’s smooth moves, Gecko Gloves do demonstrate that scaling a wall is a plausible feat.

Stanford engineers to Colbert: Spider-Man is plausible

“Use a device like this and a human can climb a glass wall,” explained Elliot Hawkes, a mechanical engineering graduate student at Stanford. The design of the Gecko Glove spreads pressure across the wall-facing surface in order to support the weight of a human being, or a spider-bitten teenaged superhero. When Gecko Gloves were first introduced in 2014, the Stanford team included 24 adhesive tiles on each glove pad. The sticky tiles are layered with nanofibers that allow the gloves to release their adhesive hold when pulled away at the perfect angle. Depressive springs on the back of each tile allow for even distribution of pressure so that the gloves can support way more than a gecko’s weight.

“It’s a lot of fun, but also a little weird, because it doesn’t feel like you should be gripping glass,” Hawkes said in a press release touting the invention. “You keep expecting to slip off, and when you don’t, it surprises you. It’s pretty exhilarating.”

These nanofibers and the theory behind the Gecko Gloves have also featured in Stanford projects like the StickyBot, a wall-climbing lizard robot. But when Stephen Colbert ran a segment on The Late Show explaining how “Science Has Ruined Spider-Man,” Hawkes couldn’t let it stand. That’s when Stanford set out to make a rebuttal video, demonstrating the power of Gecko Gloves and teaching everyone a lesson worthy of Peter Parker himself: With great power comes great responsibility. And don’t ever doubt Spider-Man.

Chloe Olewitz
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Chloe is a writer from New York with a passion for technology, travel, and playing devil's advocate. You can find out more…
Researchers hid a prompt injection inside a PNG, and AI fell for it
Hacker

AI coding assistants like Claude are becoming every developer's favorite coworker. They can review code, explain confusing functions, and even write entire features with a single prompt. But new research suggests that this growing trust could also become their biggest weakness.

A team of security researchers (professor Sudipta Chattopadhyay and researcher Murali Ediga) has demonstrated an unusual attack that doesn't target the AI model directly. Instead, it targets what the AI doesn't pay enough attention to during code reviews. Rather than hiding malicious instructions in lines of code, the researchers tucked them inside an image file. Since many AI review tools treat images as decorative assets rather than as something worth inspecting, the pull request can appear perfectly harmless and sail through the review.

Read more
AI has already fallen into the wrong hands and they’re using it to make bombs
Logo, Text

Artificial intelligence has quickly become the go-to tool for everything from writing emails and summarizing meetings to helping students study or developers debug code. But the same technology that saves people time can also be misused, and a new report suggests that terrorist organizations are finding ways to do exactly that.

According to a research paper shared with The New York Times ahead of its publication, researchers found evidence that members of Boko Haram have been using popular AI chatbots to support both day-to-day activities and combat-related tasks. Interviews with 27 former members conducted in Nigeria over the past two years suggest that tools such as ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Grok, Meta AI, and DeepSeek were used to gather technical information, troubleshoot weapons, and even assist with planning attacks.

Read more
Claude Code can now browse the web without opening Chrome
The desktop app now includes an in-app browser that can read websites, click links, and interact with web apps.
Claude Code Featured

Developers spend a surprising amount of time bouncing between their code editor, browser tabs, API documentation, GitHub issues, and design files. Anthropic thinks Claude Code should simply do all of that without constantly asking users to switch windows. The company has announced a new in-app browser for Claude Code on desktop, allowing its AI coding assistant to open websites, read documentation, inspect designs, and interact with web pages directly from within the application.

A browser built into Claude Code

Read more