Do humans make computers smarter?

germany self driving car tests mercedes autonomous
As machine learning makes computers smarter than us in some important ways, does adding a human to the mix make the overall system smarter? Does human plus machine always beat the machine by itself?

The question is easy when we think about using computers to do, say, long division. Would it really help to have a human hovering over the machine reminding it to carry the one? The issue is becoming less clear, and more important, as autonomous cars start to roam our streets.

Siri, you can drive my car

Many wary citizens assume that for safety’s sake an autonomous car ought to have a steering wheel and brakes that a human can use to override the car’s computer in an emergency. They assume – correctly for now – that humans are better drivers: so far, autonomous cars have more accidents, mainly minor and caused by human-driven cars, but I’m willing to bet that the accident rate for cars without human overrides will be significantly lower than for cars with them, as the percentage of driverless cars increases, and as they get smarter.

Does human plus machine always beat the machine by itself?

After all, autonomous cars have a 360-degree view of their surroundings, while humans are lucky to have half that. Autonomous cars react at the speed of light. Human react at the speed of neuro-chemicals, contradictory impulses, and second thoughts. Humans often make decisions that preserve their own lives above all others, while autonomous cars, especially once they’re networked, can make decisions to minimize the sum total of bad consequences. (Maybe. Mercedes has announced that its autonomous cars will save passengers over pedestrians).

In short, why would we think that cars would be safer if we put a self-interested, fear-driven, lethargic, poorly informed animal in charge?

A game of Go

But take a case where reaction time doesn’t matter, and where machines have access to the same information as humans. For example, imagine a computer playing a game of Go against a human. Surely adding a highly-skilled player to the computer’s side — or, put anthropocentrically, providing a computer to assist a highly-skilled human — would only make the computer better.

Actually not. AlphaGo, Google’s system that beat the third-ranked human player, makes its moves based on its analysis of 30 million moves in 160,000 games, processed through multiple levels of artificial neural networks that implement a type of machine learning called deep learning.

AlphaGo’s analysis assigns weights to potential moves and calculates the one most likely to lead to victory. The network of weighted moves is so large and complex that a human being simply could not comprehend the data and their relations, or predict their outcome.

Alpha (Photo: Google)

The process is far more complex than this, of course, and includes algorithms to winnow searches and to learn from successful projected behaviors. Another caveat: Recent news from MIT suggests we may be getting better at enabling neural nets to explain themselves.

Still, imagine that we gave AlphaGo a highly-ranked human partner and had that team play against an unassisted human. AlphaGo comes up with a move. Its human partner thinks it’s crazy. AlphaGo literally cannot explain why it disagrees, for the explanation is that vast network of weighted possibilities that surpasses the capacity of the human brain.

But maybe good old human intuition is better than the cold analysis of a machine. Maybe we should let the human’s judgment override the machine’s calculations.

Maybe, but nah. In the situation we’ve described, the machine wants to make one move, and the human wants to make another. Whose move is better? For any particular move, we can’t know, but we could set up some trials of AlphaGo playing with and without a human partner. We could then see which configuration wins more games.

The proof is in the results

But we don’t even need to do that to get our answer. When a human partner disagrees with AlphaGo’s recommendation, the human is in effect playing against AlphaGo: Each is coming up with its own moves. So far, evidence suggests that when humans do that, they usually lose to the computer.

Maybe we should let the human’s judgment override the machine’s calculations.

Now, of course there are situations where humans plus machines are likely to do better than machines on their own, at least for the foreseeable future. A machine might get good at recommending which greeting card to send to a coworker, but the human will still need to make the judgment about whether the recommended card is too snarky, too informal, or overly saccharine. Likewise, we may like getting recommendations from Amazon about the next book to read, but we are going to continue to want to be given a selection, rather than having Amazon automatically purchase for us the book it predicts we’ll like most.

We are also a big cultural leap away from letting computers arrange our marriages, even though they may well be better at it than we are, since our 40 to 50 percent divorce rate is evidence that we suck at it.

In AI we trust

As we get used to the ability of deep learning to come to conclusions more reliable than the ones our human brains come up with, the fields we preserve for sovereign human judgment will narrow. After all, the computer may well know more about our coworker than we do, and thus will correctly steer us away from the card with the adorable cats because one of our coworker’s cats just died, or because, well, the neural network may not be able to tell us why. And if we find we always enjoy Amazon’s top recommendations, we might find it reasonable to stop looking at its second choices, much less at its explanation of its choices for us.

After all, we don’t ask our calculators to show us their work.

The views expressed here are solely those of the author and do not reflect the beliefs of Digital Trends.

Smart Home

With Personal Food Computers, nerd farmers are finding the best way to grow

MIT research scientist Caleb Harper wants to grow basil designed to prevent heart disease. It involves a personal food computer, climate manipulation, and open sourcing food. One day, your doctor could prescribe you a diet of food grown…

Have a spooky dance party at an abandoned mansion with Fortnite's new challenges

The Fortnite season 7, week 2 challenges have arrived in Battle Royale. From searching for chests to dancing off at an abandoned mansion, here's how to do them and the rewards you get for completing them.

Bosch’s CES-bound shuttle concept takes us on a trip to a not-too-distant future

Bosch envisions a future in which driverless shuttles occupy their own market segment. The German firm won't build the shuttles, but it wants to provide everything else, ranging from the drive system to the apps used to hail them.
Product Review

AKG's signature studio sound goes straight to your head with these stunning cans

With gorgeous looks and great sound, AKG’s N700NC are a formidable entry into the wireless noise-canceling headphone race. We put them to the test to see if they can beat out the absolute best in the business.

The most common Xbox One X problems, and how to fix them

The Xbox One X is a brilliant console, but it's not without its issues, ranging from simple annoyances to severe hardware problems. Here are common Xbox One X problems and how to fix them.
Smart Home

How Alexa and Google Home can lend a hand over the holidays

Voice assistants are great helpers in the kitchen, so Alexa and Google Home are extra useful for holidays. Here are some ways your smart speakers can keep you in the holiday spirit.
Emerging Tech

Time for test-tube turkey? Everything you need to know about lab-grown meat

Lab-grown meat is big business. A handful of enterprising startups have raised and invested hundreds of millions of dollars into nascent technology, banking on breakthroughs in biotech to revolutionize the food industry.
Health & Fitness

Dread the gym? This smart mirror delivers your fitness fix at home

Mirror, launched back in September, is part mirror and part LCD display with on-demand workouts built into it. We visited Mirror's HQ in NYC to test it out and to see if it's really worth cancelling that gym membership for.

To capture nature’s insanity, this storm chaser built his own 16K camera rig

Sure, 16K cinema cameras don't yet exist -- but that doesn't mean you can't make your own. Storm chaser and producer Martin Lisius recently captured a 16K time-lapse film that showcases the powerful beauty of supercell storms.

The best Black Friday tech deals from across the web, all in one place

Amazon, Walmart, and Best Buy are offering the best online Black Friday deals, and we've worked hard gathering all of those sweet savings into one convenient location. Get them before their gone!
Emerging Tech

Electric bikes and scooters are here to save the world! But here’s the thing …

E-bike and e-scooter usage has increased in popularity, but also troublesome. Providing these two-wheeled alternative transports while keeping users safe, is what smart cities are grappling with.

How bike tech lets Red Bull Rampage riders flirt with death, and survive

Red Bull Rampage is the craziest mountain bike event in the world, pushing riders to their limits. Fortunately they are armed with some of the best bike technology around, allowing them survive this wild and dangerous competition.

7 insane roads that will push self-driving cars to their very limits

Self-driving cars are getting better all the time, but we won't ever be convinced of their readiness for prime time till we see them comfortably handle some of the world's craziest roads. Here are our picks.

Where Toronto sees smart sidewalks, residents see ‘1984.’ So what now?

Google-parent Alphabet is partnering with Toronto to develop a new, smart neighborhood, but some are concerned about privacy and the company’s motives. Could residents derail the project?