Skip to main content

JVC HA-FX40 Review

JVC HA FX40 earphones
JVC HA-FX40
“The fit, comfort and security are excellent, especially for only $30 — and they still sound noticeably better than the dreadfully awful giveaway buds often included with your MP3 player or phone.”
Pros
  • Noticeably better sound than stock mobile-device earbuds
  • Plenty loud with any device due to high sensitivity
  • Good amount of bass
  • Angled ear tubes and rubber-fit stabilizers provide comfortable, secure fit
Cons
  • Somewhat bright, harsh-sounding upper mids and treble
  • Lower-than-average noise isolation
  • Awful, scissors-only blister packaging

Look around at some of the latest electronic gadgets out there and chances are good you’ll find a healthy chunk of them will have one buzzword in common: carbon. A quick search on Amazon turned up well over 100,000 items that mentioned carbon fiber in their descriptions, ranging from things like wristwatches and iPhone cases to men’s bracelets and… wedding ring bands?

It appears this trend hasn’t gone unnoticed by JVC either, which bills its HA-FX40 earphones as “The world’s first headphones to use new carbon nanotubes technology.” All marketing lingo and buzzwords aside, we were more interested to hear how these low-cost $30 earphones sounded compared to the throwaway ‘buds that come with iPods and their ilk. Read on for our findings.

Out of box

Having evaluated plenty of earphones lately, we’ve seen them come in all different kinds of packaging, some worse than others. Unfortunately, the JVC HA-FX40s came in the worst packaging of all: a small, hermetically-sealed, impossible-to-open-with-your-bare-hands blister pack.

JVC HA FX40 review headphones accessories earbud sizes cable clipOf course, we can understand why some manufacturers choose to go this route — it’s a compact, cost effective way of packaging their products and it helps deter in-store openings and possible theft. From a consumer’s point of view, however, blister packs like this are sheer misery: Getting to the goods inside is gonna take some work. This means there’s zero chance of enjoying these JVCs straight off the store’s rack unless you happen to have a pair scissors stashed in your car or on your person somewhere.

Once we did manage to open up the HA-FX40’s packaging, we found a total of four sets of eartips, including one pair of memory foam tips, a cord clip, and instructions printed on the internal card stock… which we nearly destroyed in the process of cutting apart the blister pack.

Features and design

True to their marketing, the HA-FX40s feature diaphragms made out of carbon nanotubes. It’s unclear whether or not the diaphragms are made exclusively from this material, as JVC’s website description doesn’t provide any further details, but the result is reportedly clearer and crisper sound. Other features include: dual-layer, aluminum-plated housings that are said to provide excellent noise isolation; angled eartips to better seat the eartubes within the ear canal; and rubber fitting stabilizers for better security.

JVC HA FX40 review headphones top in ear earphones
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Performance

We used these JVCs the way we figured most folks purchasing a $30 set of earphones would — straight from the headphone outputs of an iPhone 4, iPod shuffle, and Dell laptop. We also kept handy some stock iPod shuffle earbuds and a plethora of giveaway earbuds for comparison.

We then started listening to the HA-FX40s the way we figured most buyers would as well —straight out of the package with no break-in. We were immediately impressed with their prodigious output capabilities: The JVC HA-FX40s played noticeably louder than almost every other set of earphones we had on hand. Those craving an unhealthy amount of volume should have no trouble getting it from the JVC HA-FX40.

Starting from the bottom sonically, the JVCs had a nice, weighty bass overall, even if it wasn’t terribly deep. At times, they could sound just a little too ripe on bass-heavy music, such as on the tracks “Paper Tiger” and “Guess I’m Doing Fine,” from Beck’s seminal album Sea Change. Taken as a whole, though, we definitely preferred the HA-FX40’s more ample bass to the lean presentation from many of the giveaway earphones we had on hand.

The JVCs also had pretty decent lower midrange detail for such a low-priced set of earphones. While they had a tough time with things like developing a piano’s complex harmonics and transients, the HA-FX40s never seriously clipped instrumental timbres either. Again, the JVC earphones definitely provided more enjoyable sound than anything we’ve ever heard from stock iPod buds. We think this is fairly impressive, given their $30 price tag.

While the HA-FX40s do have a clear and crisp sound as promised, they also have one glaring sonic bunion as a result: An upper midrange and treble that’s just too bright and etched sounding. Even after 20 hours of break-in, both male sibilants and female vocals sounded consistently emphasized, giving anything with higher frequency information an unnatural and distracting harshness and overall edginess. Cymbals were just too sizzly; horns too brassy; and piano too tinkly. Still, this wasn’t a huge deal given the HA-FX40’s price, and overall they offered far better sound than the low-cost competition.

Functionally, we really appreciated the JVC’s excellent fit. Even after extended listening sessions spanning more than two hours, the HA-FX40’s eartubes always remained firmly seated without any undue pressure or any chance of falling out. We were also able to corral various testers to try out the different size ear tips, and each reported experiencing the same comfortable, highly secure fit.

Even though JVC mentions that the HA-FX40s should provide excellent noise isolation, we actually found them to be somewhat below average in this regard. The JVCs did eliminate a little bit of noise, but we could still clearly hear conversations and TV sound. Buyers looking for more robust noise isolation should probably look elsewhere.

Conclusion

Despite their somewhat bright and harsh treble, the JVC HA-FX40s do have a lot going for them. The fit, comfort and security are excellent, especially for only $30 — and they still sound noticeably better than the dreadfully awful giveaway buds often included with your MP3 player or phone. If you’re looking for a step up from your stock earbuds without breaking the bank, and don’t mind a lot of extra sizzle in your sound, give the JVC HA-FX40s listen.

Highs

  • Noticeably better sound than stock mobile-device earbuds
  • Plenty loud with any device due to high sensitivity
  • Good amount of bass
  • Angled ear tubes and rubber-fit stabilizers provide comfortable, secure fit

Lows

  • Somewhat bright, harsh-sounding upper mids and treble
  • Lower-than-average noise isolation
  • Awful, scissors-only blister packaging
Oliver Amnuayphol
Oliver Amnuayphol is a Hi-Fi, home theater and sound geek who did time as an audio guru, blogger, A/V sales associate, and…
A $20 Chromecast with Google TV is perfect for this one reason
Chromecast with Google TV.

Normally, I would never recommend that someone buy a streaming device that tops out at 1080p resolution. Even if you somehow don't have a 4K TV already — I'm not judging, there are plenty of good reasons — you might well have one in the future. And at that point, it's better to not have to buy new hardware until absolutely necessary. Just go ahead and spend the extra $30 now for a 4K version.

But it's hard to say no to a $20 Chromecast with Google TV HD.

Read more
Tidal vs. Spotify: Which music streaming service has the features you need?
Tidal app for iOS on an iPhone 14 showing now playing screen with Max quality track.

Spotify is the world's leading music streaming service, with over 236 million active paid subscribers and a vast library of artists, albums, podcasts, and audiobooks. It is available on almost every desktop and mobile device. However, if you are a fan of hi-res audio, Tidal may be a better option as it emphasizes hi-res content and offers a vast collection of music and video content.

To determine which platform is better, we compared Spotify and Tidal based on price, sound quality, and supported devices.
Price
Spotify has two tiers of service for individual users. The free, ad-supported tier gives access to the entire library of Spotify content, but has restrictions on how you can interact with it and also has ads. The full-featured Premium plan costs $11 per month, which is standard for the industry now. Spotify also offers plans for two individuals for $15 per month, called Spotify Premium Duo, and a six-person family plan (with parental controls) for $17 per month. There's also a student plan at just $6 per month.

Read more
What is Qobuz? Music, features, and pricing explained
An iPhone 15 Pro showing Qobuz app.

Are you a music lover who craves the highest-quality sound possible, but can't quite afford the hefty price tag that comes with a top-of-the-line audio setup like turntables, integrated amplifiers, and hi-fi speakers? Fear not, my friend, for there is a solution -- Qobuz, the ultra-high-quality music streaming platform that will have you listening and singing to the tunes of your favorite artists in no time.

While some audiophiles may argue that physical media is the only way to achieve true sound quality, the convenience and affordability of Qobuz is hard be beat. So sit back, relax, and let us guide you through everything you need to know about this music streaming service. Just be sure to keep it on the down-low from your vinyl-collecting pals -- we wouldn't want to start a music war.
What is Qobuz?
Qobuz is a music-streaming platform with access to over 100 million songs, all of which are available in the hi-res FLAC (Free Lossless Audio Codec) format. As far as quality goes, it’s tough to beat the kind of clarity, dynamic range, and definition you’ll hear on a Qobuz track, with the catalog being available from CD-quality (16-bit at 44.1kHz) up to 24-bit at 192kHz. 

Read more