Skip to main content

Even a Best Picture Oscar doesn’t make Apple TV+ like HBO

There are a million takes on the 94th Academy Awards. The vast majority at this point likely are about Will Smith and Chris Rock, which is a shame on so many levels. It overshadowed the win of Summer of Soul and Questlove’s moving speech. It darkened the light sparked by Ariana DeBose’s moving opening speech for her West Side Story win. (It did not, however, take the shine off of Yuh-Jung Youn, or the kindness of Lady Gaga.)

But it did take away, at least a little, from CODA‘s win for Best Picture, which actually is what we’re here to talk about. CODA was a great movie, a different movie, and a seminal moment for Apple TV+. It’s the service’s first Oscar for Best Picture, the first Best Picture win for any streaming service.

Oscars Week 2022 badge on an image of the CODA team accepting an Oscar.
Neilson Barnard/Getty Images

And so it is tempting to say something like: “With the win, Apple has, in the span of a couple quick years, achieved the stature of non-Hollywood houses like HBO.”

That’s true. But it doesn’t change the fact that Apple TV+ is not — nor will it ever be — HBO.

It’s rumored that Apple spent more than $10 million to market CODA, which is an acronym for “Children of Deaf Adults,” for the Academy Awards. That’s not uncommon, actually. There’s an entire industry devoted to Oscar lobbying publicly and privately for a film to win an award. Everyone does it, even if they don’t have anywhere near the amount of cash that Apple has laying around.

What makes HBO different is history and legacy. It’s not fair to say that Apple has bought its way into the Academy Awards. (Though it’s not entirely incorrect, either.) A good movie is still a good movie. A good series is still a good series. And Apple TV+ has an inordinate number of both given its mere two years in existence. That’s due in part to the folks running the show, but also due to dollars a year thanks to its hardware business, which gave the service a built-in subscriber base thank to all the free trials that saw a great deal of extension after the first year. There are a lot of iPhones and iPad and Macs out there, plus all the other platforms on which Apple TV+ is available.

Apple TV+ and HBO Max app icons on Apple TV.
Phil Nickinson/Digital Trends

That’s the obvious part. But you also have to consider lineage. HBO was born nearly 50 years ago. Long before the personal computer, never mind the internet, cellular networks and smartphones. HBO is a premium channel that from the outset required two subscriptions — first to a cable company, which itself was just really gaining traction in the 1980s in much of America, and then to HBO itself.

Apple TV+, like Netflix and Amazon Prime Video, were built on the foundations paved by HBO decades ago.

You got what you paid for back then, which was movies and series and sports and comedy, without advertising — all in a time that didn’t have a dozen different movie channels living alongside traditional broadcast channels, which maybe showed a half-dozen flicks a week, at best. And HBO wasn’t bound by the same puritanical standards as broadcast or even cable TV back then. Hell, you didn’t even have to have a subscription to HBO to get a glimpse of the utopia that was R-rated movies, or scandalous series like Real Sex. Who among us over 40 years old hasn’t wasted a few hours squinting at scrambled video, in hopes of seeing a single unblurred body part, if only for a second.

And all of that is before you remember that HBO is where you found the best stand-up comedy back in the 1980s and ’90s, long before Netflix or Amazon. It was where you watched Wimbledon, of all things. (The first thing broadcast on HBO, interestingly enough, was an NHL game.) It’s where you watched things that simply weren’t available anywhere else.

An image of the cast and crew working on the set of CODA.

So, yes, it truly is amazing that Apple TV+ managed a Best Picture Oscar on top of all the other accolades. (And, by the way, being a “streamer” isn’t one of them. Apple TV+ encodes and decodes video the same way as everyone else. It’s just a matter of where it’s available. And in 2022, you’re either available everywhere, or nowhere.) This isn’t a knock of Apple TV+ at all. I pay for it. I’ve enjoyed a surprising number of shows and movies, from Ted Lasso on. (Severance is excellent.)

But Apple TV+ was built on the ground that HBO paved for so many decades before it. Same goes for Netflix and Amazon and any others in the new generation. It’s just that the field has been leveled, so to speak. HBO breached the barrier to entry all those years ago, and those barriers simply don’t exist today, at least not in the same ways.

And those of us on the other side of the screen get to benefit from it.

Editors' Recommendations

Phil Nickinson
Section Editor, Audio/Video
Phil spent the 2000s making newspapers with the Pensacola (Fla.) News Journal, the 2010s with Android Central and then the…
Oscar-winning director Alfonso Cuaron inks exclusive deal with Apple TV+
alfonso cuaron reportedly talks direct harry potter spinoff fantastic beasts

Another day, another big name locked down for Apple TV+. Filmmaker Alfonso Cuarón, who directed hits like Gravity, Children of Men, and Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban, has agreed to develop new television shows exclusively for Apple's upcoming streaming service, which launches this November.

Under the terms of the deal, Cuarón will develop series for Apple through his production company Esperanto Filmoj. Cuarón's producing partner Gabriela Rodriguez is expected to oversee day-to-day operations, and Apple will retain exclusive rights to all television shows that Cuarón develops while under contract. Some of these programs will be made in conjunction with Anonymous Content, with which Cuarón has a non-exclusive deal, although he's looking to work with other collaborators as well.

Read more
HBO arrives on Apple’s new TV app, letting fans watch Game of Thrones offline

HBO is the latest addition to Apple's new TV app, and it comes with a couple of handy extra features, including a weeklong free trial and support for offline viewing.

HBO has joined the Apple TV Channels program, 9to5Mac reports, and costs $15, the same price that you'd pay for an HBO Now subscription or HBO access through services like Sling TV or Hulu.

Read more
Not 65? Dish’s senior deal may still save you $165 [Sponsored]
Man watching NFL on Dish.

Your first gray hairs and wrinkles likely started way before 65, and with Dish so can your senior discounts. Dish is a satellite-based TV service that serves all parts of the country, even places where traditional cable and internet providers might not have the infrastructure for. And, if you're a mere 55, you can get access to Dish's "55 and Older Deal". It's a deal that provides free content of your choosing at the beginning of every month, perfect for those days of extra relaxing that you've earned with time. This deal represents a $165 value, yours free if you sign up with Dish via the button below. Keep reading for more details and why you should get Dish.

Why you should get Dish at 55+
In general, Dish is very convenient for the quiet lifestyle. If you're migrating to lower cost parts of the country to plan for a cheaper, more fulfilling retirement, you might find that infrastructure for services you're used to isn't quite the same. Dish changes that quite a bit, due to their satellite-based service that works everywhere equally. All you need is a roof and the ability to point at the sky. Plus, Dish has some perks that you wouldn't normally realize. With Dish, for example, you can catch every NFL game — even those out-of-market ones that other services miss — and with your extra time, you might be able to actually catch them. If you're hosting Christmas with the grandkids, Dish Christmas movies will be an entertainment lifesaver.

Read more