Skip to main content

Sony Master Series A9G vs Sony A8G: What’s the difference?

We can’t fault the Sony Master Series A9G. It’s the finest 4K TV we’ve had the pleasure of reviewing. However, it’s not all that different from the cheaper, (slightly) lower-end Sony A8G. But what are these differences — and most importantly, are they worth the additional $1,000-$1,300 Sony is asking for the flagship Sony A9G? Let’s find out.

Soundbar? No chance

First up, design. There isn’t a whole lot of difference between the Sony A9G and the Sony A8G in this regard. The latest model comes with a sleeker, slimmer stand that leaves almost no space between the bottom of the television and the surface it is resting on. The bezel surrounding the screen is also a bit thinner and the rear doesn’t protrude quite as much.

All in all, the space reductions are minor details that we wouldn’t even have mentioned if we weren’t in the business of painting as clear and accurate a picture as possible — with the stand being the biggest visual difference. Of course, this is something that’s bound to be controversial as the new design leaves virtually no space for a soundbar to rest beneath the screen when stand-mounted.

Notice how the Sony A9G almost sits flat on the surface? Riley Young/Digital Trends

Also worth mentioning is the addition of an eARC HDMI slot on the Sony Master Series A9G (not to be confused with HDMI 2.1, which neither the A9G or A8G support). We have a full explainer detailing what eARC is and why it’s useful, so we won’t run into it now. In a nutshell, it’s HDMI ARC with the addition of original, full-resolution audio transmission through HDMI.

Kick, punch, thud

Plus, Sony has (marginally) improved its trademark Acoustic Surface tech on the Sony Master Series A9G. For those unaware, this eliminates bulky speakers on the front of the television by sending waves through the screen itself — creating a unique effect of voices and sound effects seemingly coming from their respective locations on the screen (left, right, or center).

The difference with the Sony Master Series A9G is that Acoustic Surface is twice as powerful — on paper, at least. Sony says that three of the four channels have been bumped up from 10W up to 20W. Although, this doesn’t translate to a much better viewing experience. The two televisions sound near-identical, save for the fact the A9G has a little bit more kick to it.

Not a (built-in) speaker in sight. Riley Young/Digital Trends

Let’s face it, though: If you’re splashing out north of $1,000 for a television, you’re going to be hooking it up to at least a soundbar, if not an entire surround sound setup — so the rumble Acoustic Surface makes will go unnoticed. Better yet, the Sony Master Series A9G can be used as a center channel speaker, via a terminal on the rear, whereas the Sony A8G cannot.

Let’s get real deep

The Sony Master Series A9G and Sony Master Series A8G feature the same 4K Ultra HD OLED screen. However, the A9G is equipped with Sony’s leading Sony X1 Ultimate picture processor, versus the Sony X1 Extreme on the more affordable A8G. The main advantage here is that the top-of-the-line version is better at object-based processing, which results in better depth.

Thin. Super thin. Riley Young/Digital Trends

For Dolby Vision fans, the premier Sony A9G is armed with Dolby Vision Day and Dolby Vision Night picture modes. It has Netflix Calibrated Mode, too. By comparison, the Sony A8G is lacking all three of these picture presets. It does share IMAX Enhanced with the A9G, though. But this isn’t a big deal — play around with the picture settings yourself and you can create a more personal effect.

Elegant, but not necessary

Finally, the Sony A9G comes bundled with a slightly more elegant remote control, which functions in the exact same way as the one bundled with the A8G, and souped-up hardware that delivers a smoother Android TV experience. Having said that, while a bit sluggish at times, Android TV is just as functional on the A8G — so don’t consider this reason alone to upgrade.

So, which do you need?

The bottom line is there just isn’t enough of a difference between the Sony Master Series A9G and the Sony A8G to warrant the $1,000 to $1,300 price hike, depending on the screen size you opt for. Sure, if money is no object and you’re insistent on having the best of the best, opt for the Sony A9G. For everyone else, the Sony A8G is definitely the way to go.

Editors' Recommendations

Josh Levenson
Having spent half a decade writing about the latest AV, mobile and social news for some of the world’s largest…
Toshiba brings 120Hz to Fire TVs with new flagship M550-Series
Toshiba M-Series 4K Fire TV.

Toshiba has announced the first smart TV based on Amazon's Fire TV software that has a native 120Hz LCD panel. The M550KU-Series LED 4K UHD Smart TV with Fire TV starts at $800 for the 55-inch model. Other sizes include the $1,000 65-inch and $1,200 75-inch models. All three sizes will be available in December on Amazon.com, as well as Best Buy (online and in stores), starting with the 55-inch model on December 6.

The M-Series is the latest model to bring a set of upscale specifications to Fire TV-enabled smart TVs. It joins the recently announced Fire TV Omni, which was designed by Amazon itself, as well as the Insignia F50, a Fire TV with a quantum dot display.

Read more
TCL’s 8K 6-Series mini-LED TVs are shockingly affordable
A TCL 8K 6-Series TV showing THX's Certified Game Mode.

TCL has been teasing us for months, making us wait to hear how much the company will charge for its 8K resolution 6-Series mini-LED QLED TVs. Now we know, and boy, was it worth the wait. The 75-inch model is just $3,000, while the smaller, 65-inch version rings in at $2,200. They both go on sale today with limited availability at major retailers.

To put those prices in perspective, LG and Samsung -- the only other companies that have mini-LED-based 8K TVs in 2021 -- charge $3,500 for their most affordable 65-inch models and $4,800 for their 75-inch models.

Read more
4K vs. 1080p vs. 720p TV: What’s the difference?
Sony Z8H TV

Buying a new TV can be a fun-filled adventure -- but also an agonizing nightmare. In stores and online, you're bombarded with terms like HDR, OLED, QLED, 4K Ultra HD and Full HD. But what do they mean? Well, the latter two are resolutions, and they're used to indicate the number of pixels on a screen. As far as TV lingo goes, the more pixels there are, the better the picture quality. To understand why, though, we have to look at each resolution a bit more closely. Only then can you start considering what screen size is best and finally start taking a look at our list of the best 4K TVs to find the television of your dreams.
Pixels
Pixels are the building blocks for every display you've ever seen. They're tiny little dots that, together, make up the picture you see on a screen. You can only see these pixels if you're fairly close to the screen, of course. From a proper viewing distance, thousands of them blend to make the image on your screen.

Resolutions
720p
A 720p resolution television has 1,280 columns and 720 rows of pixels, hence "720p." Multiply the two numbers for a total of 921,600 pixels. This is the minimum TV resolution that can be called "high definition," or HDTV.
1080p
Often, 1080p is referred to as "Full HD." In a 1080p television, there are 1,920 columns multiplied by 1,080 rows for a total of 2,073,600 pixels -- more than twice as many pixels as you'll find in a 720p TV screen. For a while now, 1080p has been the industry standard for high-definition displays, and most content (that is, television broadcasts, shows, and movies) is produced and distributed in 1080p.
4K Ultra HD
The next level of HD is 4K -- often called "Ultra HD" or UHD. Technically, the name is a bit of a misnomer because there are 3,840 columns and 2,160 rows of pixels that make up a 4K TV screen, which is why you'll occasionally see this resolution referred to as 2160p. That's a total of 8,294,400 pixels, which is four times as many pixels as a Full HD 1080p display and nine times as many pixels as a 720p display. This is considered a high pixel density.

Read more