Skip to main content

Court fines Apple a whopping $625 million over FaceTime and VPN patent infringement

apple encryption court order news logo
There are few corporate entities less scrupulous than so-called patent trolls. They’re companies that don’t manufacture or sell the intellectual property they own, but nonetheless happily extract licensing fees and settlements from companies they identify as guilty of infringing on said property. In this morally dubious category of firms, Nevada-based VirnetX is unquestionably one of the most prolific: It won a $200 million verdict against Microsoft in 2010, and turned its attention to Apple that same year. Now the decision against Apple is out, and the news isn’t at all good for the iPhone maker.

“Cases like this simply reinforce the desperate need for patent reform.”

Jurors in an East Texas federal court awarded VirnetX a massive $625 million over patents related to Apple’s virtual private network (VPN) and FaceTime features. The penalties amounted to almost a $100 million more than VirnetX was seeking.

The fine actually represents a consolidation of two separate settlements. A jury in 2012 ordered Apple to pay $355 million after ruling that the company violated several of VirnetX’s secure VPN network patents, but the decision was overturned on appeal. This week, the court reinstated the original fine and assessed additional damages of $290 million over intellectual property violations in FaceTime.

At issue are several patents, at least one of which which dates back to 1998. They describe “secure communications” over the Internet, vague technology that VirnetX argues Apple improperly imitated in its implementation of VPN, FaceTime, and iMessage encryption. “The jury saw what we have been saying all along: Apple has been infringing on VirnetX’s patented technology for years,” the legal firm that represents VirnetX said in a statement.

Apple, unsurprisingly, disagreed. “We are surprised and disappointed by the outcome and we’re going to appeal,” said a company spokesperson, who added that all of the patents which VirnetX cited in its original case have since been invalidated by the United States Patent Office. “Our employees independently designed this technology over many years,” the company said. “Cases like this simply reinforce the desperate need for patent reform.”

The Cupertino company may have a point. According to research firm United Patents, holding companies like VirnetX filed 66.9 percent of patent lawsuits in the United States in 2015 alone, and the Eastern District of Texas handled a disproportionate number of those cases — 44 percent (and over 400 alone last November). Why the preference for Texas? Consumer advocacy group the Electronic Frontier Foundation maintains that the Eastern District erects arbitrary judicial barriers to defendants in patent trials. While companies as large and profitable as Apple can afford a legal team capable of combating such out-of-state cases, smaller firms often opt to settle with patent abusers.

There’s hope on the horizon — a petition currently before the Federal Circuit aims to reduce the number of cases in the Eastern District’s jurisdiction — but until bogus patent enforcement becomes significantly more challenging or expensive, patent holding firms will no doubt continue to litigate. VirnetX, for one, is actively pursuing cases against Cisco, Siemens, Avaya, and others.

Editors' Recommendations

Kyle Wiggers
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Kyle Wiggers is a writer, Web designer, and podcaster with an acute interest in all things tech. When not reviewing gadgets…
Here comes yet another patent infringement lawsuit against Apple over FaceTime
mac webcam hacking vulnerability facetime

Apple's FaceTime must have some sort of gigantic bulls-eye on its back because companies have come out of the woodwork to sue the Cupertino company over its voice-over-IP (VoIP) service's alleged patent infringement. Unfortunately for Apple, its legal woes continue with a new lawsuit filed in federal district court in California.

According to the complaint, Straight Path Group, a subsidiary belonging to leasing firm Straight Path Communications, accuses Apple of violating five of its patents: U.S. Patent Nos. 6,009,469, 6,108,704, 6,131,121, 6,701,365, and 7,149,208. Each of the five patents have claims dating back to September 25, 1995, and were owned and used by the NetSpeak Corporation in its WebPhone product. Interestingly, the patents have been re-examined and validated by the Patent Trial and Appeals Board (PTAB).

Read more
Apple’s legal woes continue as Caltech sues for alleged Wi-Fi patent infringement
apple caltech patent infringement iphone se 005

If you thought Apple's legal troubles ended with a patent troll's recent victory over the Cupertino, California-based company, then you might want to cover your eyes. Apple is back in court for another patent infringement case, as reported by MacRumors.

The California Institute of Technology (Caltech) filed a lawsuit against Apple on May 26, with the university accusing the company of patent infringement. More specifically, Apple knowingly violated four of Caltech's patents, which are reportedly vital to the 802.11n and 802.11ac Wi-Fi standards, in all of its major products from 2012 onward.

Read more
Patent troll VirnetX demands shutdown of Apple’s FaceTime and iMessage
how to save text messages

Patent troll VirnetX just doesn't know when to quit. The company just won a $626 million court battle over FaceTime and iMessage, but is now asking a federal judge to order that both of those services be shut down, according to a report from Law360.

VirnetX made the request on Wednesday, also asking the judge to increase the damages by another $190 million -- Apple, for its part, is asking for a retrial, saying that VirnetX's lawyers misrepresented evidence, and that the evidence presented at trial did not support any claims of infringement. Apple also said that it should not have to pay royalties to VirnetX.

Read more